Identifying Asthma-Related Symptoms From Electronic Health Records Using a Hybrid Natural Language Processing Approach Within a Large Integrated Health Care System: Retrospective Study.

IF 2
JMIR AI Pub Date : 2025-05-02 DOI:10.2196/69132
Fagen Xie, Robert S Zeiger, Mary Marycania Saparudin, Sahar Al-Salman, Eric Puttock, William Crawford, Michael Schatz, Stanley Xu, William M Vollmer, Wansu Chen
{"title":"Identifying Asthma-Related Symptoms From Electronic Health Records Using a Hybrid Natural Language Processing Approach Within a Large Integrated Health Care System: Retrospective Study.","authors":"Fagen Xie, Robert S Zeiger, Mary Marycania Saparudin, Sahar Al-Salman, Eric Puttock, William Crawford, Michael Schatz, Stanley Xu, William M Vollmer, Wansu Chen","doi":"10.2196/69132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asthma-related symptoms are significant predictors of asthma exacerbation. Most of these symptoms are documented in clinical notes in a free-text format, and effective methods for capturing asthma-related symptoms from unstructured data are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to develop a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm for identifying symptoms associated with asthma from clinical notes within a large integrated health care system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed unstructured clinical notes within 2 years before a visit with asthma diagnosis in 2013-2018 and 2021-2022 to identify 4 common asthma-related symptoms. Related terms and phrases were initially compiled from publicly available resources and then refined through clinician input and chart review. A rule-based NLP algorithm was iteratively developed and refined via multiple rounds of chart review followed by adjudication. Subsequently, transformer-based deep learning algorithms were trained using the same manually annotated datasets. A hybrid NLP algorithm was then generated by combining rule-based and transformer-based algorithms. The hybrid NLP algorithm was finally applied to the implementation notes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11,374,552 eligible clinical notes with 128,211,793 sentences were analyzed. After applying the hybrid algorithm to implementation notes, at least 1 asthma-related symptom was identified in 1,663,450 out of 127,763,086 (1.3%) sentences and 858,350 out of 11,364,952 (7.55%) notes, respectively. Cough was the most frequently identified at both the sentence (1,363,713/127,763,086, 1.07%) and note (660,685/11,364,952, 5.81%) levels, while chest tightness was the least frequent at both the sentence (141,733/127,763,086, 0.11%) and note (64,251/11,364,952, 0.57%) levels. The frequency of multiple symptoms ranged from 0.03% (36,057/127,763,086) to 0.38% (484,050/127,763,086) at the sentence level and 0.10% (10,954/11,364,952) to 1.85% (209,805/11,364,952) at the note level. Validation against 1600 manually annotated clinical notes yielded a positive predictive value ranging from 96.53% (wheezing) to 97.42% (chest tightness) at the sentence level and 96.76% (wheezing) to 97.42% (chest tightness) at the note level. Sensitivity ranged from 93.9% (dyspnea) to 95.95% (cough) at the sentence level and 96% (chest tightness) to 99.07% (cough) at the note level. All 4 symptoms had F1-scores greater than 0.95 at both the sentence and note levels, regardless of NLP algorithms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The developed NLP algorithms could effectively capture asthma-related symptoms from unstructured clinical notes. These algorithms could be used to facilitate early asthma detection and predict exacerbation risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":73551,"journal":{"name":"JMIR AI","volume":"4 ","pages":"e69132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231518/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/69132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Asthma-related symptoms are significant predictors of asthma exacerbation. Most of these symptoms are documented in clinical notes in a free-text format, and effective methods for capturing asthma-related symptoms from unstructured data are lacking.

Objective: The study aims to develop a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm for identifying symptoms associated with asthma from clinical notes within a large integrated health care system.

Methods: We analyzed unstructured clinical notes within 2 years before a visit with asthma diagnosis in 2013-2018 and 2021-2022 to identify 4 common asthma-related symptoms. Related terms and phrases were initially compiled from publicly available resources and then refined through clinician input and chart review. A rule-based NLP algorithm was iteratively developed and refined via multiple rounds of chart review followed by adjudication. Subsequently, transformer-based deep learning algorithms were trained using the same manually annotated datasets. A hybrid NLP algorithm was then generated by combining rule-based and transformer-based algorithms. The hybrid NLP algorithm was finally applied to the implementation notes.

Results: A total of 11,374,552 eligible clinical notes with 128,211,793 sentences were analyzed. After applying the hybrid algorithm to implementation notes, at least 1 asthma-related symptom was identified in 1,663,450 out of 127,763,086 (1.3%) sentences and 858,350 out of 11,364,952 (7.55%) notes, respectively. Cough was the most frequently identified at both the sentence (1,363,713/127,763,086, 1.07%) and note (660,685/11,364,952, 5.81%) levels, while chest tightness was the least frequent at both the sentence (141,733/127,763,086, 0.11%) and note (64,251/11,364,952, 0.57%) levels. The frequency of multiple symptoms ranged from 0.03% (36,057/127,763,086) to 0.38% (484,050/127,763,086) at the sentence level and 0.10% (10,954/11,364,952) to 1.85% (209,805/11,364,952) at the note level. Validation against 1600 manually annotated clinical notes yielded a positive predictive value ranging from 96.53% (wheezing) to 97.42% (chest tightness) at the sentence level and 96.76% (wheezing) to 97.42% (chest tightness) at the note level. Sensitivity ranged from 93.9% (dyspnea) to 95.95% (cough) at the sentence level and 96% (chest tightness) to 99.07% (cough) at the note level. All 4 symptoms had F1-scores greater than 0.95 at both the sentence and note levels, regardless of NLP algorithms.

Conclusions: The developed NLP algorithms could effectively capture asthma-related symptoms from unstructured clinical notes. These algorithms could be used to facilitate early asthma detection and predict exacerbation risk.

Abstract Image

在大型综合医疗保健系统中使用混合自然语言处理方法从电子健康记录中识别哮喘相关症状:回顾性研究。
背景:哮喘相关症状是哮喘加重的重要预测因素。这些症状大多以自由文本格式记录在临床记录中,缺乏从非结构化数据中捕获哮喘相关症状的有效方法。目的:本研究旨在开发一种自然语言处理(NLP)算法,用于从大型综合医疗保健系统的临床记录中识别与哮喘相关的症状。方法:分析2013-2018年和2021-2022年就诊前2年的非结构化临床记录,以确定4种常见的哮喘相关症状。相关的术语和短语最初是从公共资源中编译的,然后通过临床医生的输入和图表审查进行完善。基于规则的NLP算法通过多轮图表审查和裁决迭代开发和完善。随后,使用相同的手动注释数据集训练基于转换器的深度学习算法。然后,将基于规则的算法和基于变换的算法相结合,生成了一种混合NLP算法。最后将混合NLP算法应用到实现笔记中。结果:共分析符合条件的临床笔记11,374,552份,句子128,211,793句。将混合算法应用于实施笔记后,在127,763,086个句子中,有1,663,450个(1.3%)和11,364,952个(7.55%)笔记中,分别识别出至少1种哮喘相关症状。咳嗽在句子(1,363,713/127,763,086,1.07%)和音符(660,685/11,364,952,5.81%)水平上都是最常见的,而胸闷在句子(141,733/127,763,086,0.11%)和音符(64,251/11,364,952,0.57%)水平上是最不常见的。多种症状出现的频率在句子层面为0.03%(36,057/127,763,086)至0.38%(484,050/127,763,086),在注释层面为0.10%(10,954/11,364,952)至1.85%(209,805/11,364,952)。对1600份人工标注的临床笔记进行验证,在句子水平上获得了96.53%(喘息)到97.42%(胸闷)的阳性预测值,在注释水平上获得了96.76%(喘息)到97.42%(胸闷)的阳性预测值。句子级别的敏感度为93.9%(呼吸困难)至95.95%(咳嗽),音符级别的敏感度为96%(胸闷)至99.07%(咳嗽)。无论采用何种NLP算法,所有4种症状在句子和笔记水平上的f1得分均大于0.95。结论:开发的NLP算法可以有效地从非结构化的临床记录中捕获哮喘相关症状。这些算法可用于促进早期哮喘检测和预测恶化风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信