Consensus Guidelines for Intermittent Auscultation in United States Community Birth Settings.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Silke Akerson, Sarah Bradbury, Rosanna Davis, Wendy Gordon, Amy Romano, Holly Scholles
{"title":"Consensus Guidelines for Intermittent Auscultation in United States Community Birth Settings.","authors":"Silke Akerson, Sarah Bradbury, Rosanna Davis, Wendy Gordon, Amy Romano, Holly Scholles","doi":"10.1111/birt.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intermittent auscultation is the gold standard for fetal assessment in uncomplicated pregnancies and labors and is used universally in the community birth setting. Great variation exists in intermittent auscultation practices and language used by community birth midwives across the country. Current standards, as defined by midwifery schools, state midwifery licensing boards, and individual midwifery practices, differ significantly and sometimes contradict each other. Community birth midwives, nurses and birth assistants, midwifery educators and those working in community birth quality improvement have been in need of common language and guidance on best practices in intermittent auscultation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Develop and disseminate consensus standards for intermittent auscultation in the community birth setting in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Creation of guidelines through a 21-month consensus process with a workgroup of educators, leaders, quality improvement experts, and practicing midwives by identifying practices supported by evidence or clinical experience, evaluating current evidence and guidelines, eliciting feedback from education, midwifery, nursing, and birth center organizations, and incorporating revisions to create the final document.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consensus was reached on various elements of intermittent auscultation and guidelines were created. These guidelines address readiness, assessment, interpretation, and documentation of fetal heart tones, clinical decision making, and areas for future research. These guidelines provide a minimum standard for performance and documentation of intermittent auscultation in community birth midwifery practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.70002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intermittent auscultation is the gold standard for fetal assessment in uncomplicated pregnancies and labors and is used universally in the community birth setting. Great variation exists in intermittent auscultation practices and language used by community birth midwives across the country. Current standards, as defined by midwifery schools, state midwifery licensing boards, and individual midwifery practices, differ significantly and sometimes contradict each other. Community birth midwives, nurses and birth assistants, midwifery educators and those working in community birth quality improvement have been in need of common language and guidance on best practices in intermittent auscultation.

Objective: Develop and disseminate consensus standards for intermittent auscultation in the community birth setting in the United States.

Methodology: Creation of guidelines through a 21-month consensus process with a workgroup of educators, leaders, quality improvement experts, and practicing midwives by identifying practices supported by evidence or clinical experience, evaluating current evidence and guidelines, eliciting feedback from education, midwifery, nursing, and birth center organizations, and incorporating revisions to create the final document.

Results: Consensus was reached on various elements of intermittent auscultation and guidelines were created. These guidelines address readiness, assessment, interpretation, and documentation of fetal heart tones, clinical decision making, and areas for future research. These guidelines provide a minimum standard for performance and documentation of intermittent auscultation in community birth midwifery practice.

美国社区分娩环境间歇听诊的共识指南。
背景:间歇听诊是评估无并发症妊娠和分娩胎儿的金标准,在社区分娩环境中被普遍使用。全国各地社区助产士在间歇听诊实践和语言使用方面存在很大差异。目前的标准,由助产学校、州助产许可委员会和个人助产实践定义,差异很大,有时甚至相互矛盾。社区助产士、护士和助产助理、助产教育工作者和从事社区分娩质量改善工作的人员需要关于间歇性听诊最佳做法的共同语言和指导。目的:在美国社区分娩环境中制定和传播间歇性听诊的共识标准。方法:由教育工作者、领导、质量改进专家和执业助产士组成的工作组通过21个月的共识过程,确定有证据或临床经验支持的实践,评估当前的证据和指南,从教育、助产、护理和生育中心组织中获取反馈,并纳入修订以创建最终文件,从而制定指南。结果:对间歇听诊的各种要素达成了共识,并制定了指南。这些指南涉及准备,评估,解释和文件胎心音,临床决策,并为未来的研究领域。这些指南为社区助产实践中间歇性听诊的表现和记录提供了最低标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care is a multidisciplinary, refereed journal devoted to issues and practices in the care of childbearing women, infants, and families. It is written by and for professionals in maternal and neonatal health, nurses, midwives, physicians, public health workers, doulas, social scientists, childbirth educators, lactation counselors, epidemiologists, and other health caregivers and policymakers in perinatal care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信