Dimensions of participation as predictors of satisfaction with roles and abilities after traumatic brain injury.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Amanda M Wisinger, Shannon B Juengst, Angelle M Sander, Robiann R Broomfield, Leia Vos, Michael W Williams, Mark Sherer
{"title":"Dimensions of participation as predictors of satisfaction with roles and abilities after traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Amanda M Wisinger, Shannon B Juengst, Angelle M Sander, Robiann R Broomfield, Leia Vos, Michael W Williams, Mark Sherer","doi":"10.1037/rep0000627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the relationship of participation dimensions with satisfaction with social roles and activities after traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Research method/design: </strong>Secondary analysis of baseline data from 127 participants enrolled in the MoodTracker intervention trial (https://ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04410770). Participants (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 35.24) were predominately male (64.6%) and non-Hispanic White (70.1%). Primary measures were the TBI Quality of Life scales for Satisfaction With Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities, Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities, Independence, Stigma, and Self-Esteem and the Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools-Objective Out and About, Social Relations, and Productivity subscales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We performed a hierarchical regression to determine the unique association of different participation dimensions to Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities. The Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools-Objective scores, representing the frequency of participation in activities, explained 18% of the variance (<i>R</i>² change = .177, <i>p</i> < .001) in Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities. Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities and Independence, representing a person's perceived participation ability, explained 40% of the variance (<i>R</i>² change = .397, <i>p</i> < .001) when added to the model. Stigma and Self-Esteem uniquely explained 8% of the variance (<i>R</i>² change = .079, <i>p</i> < .001) when added to the model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/implications: </strong>A person's self-perceived ability to participate and be independent makes a greater contribution to satisfaction with social participation than the frequency of participation. Enhanced understanding of the interplay of subjective and objective factors in influencing participation satisfaction after TBI may result in more effective interventions to support meaningful participation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000627","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/objective: This study aimed to determine the relationship of participation dimensions with satisfaction with social roles and activities after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Research method/design: Secondary analysis of baseline data from 127 participants enrolled in the MoodTracker intervention trial (https://ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04410770). Participants (Mage = 35.24) were predominately male (64.6%) and non-Hispanic White (70.1%). Primary measures were the TBI Quality of Life scales for Satisfaction With Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities, Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities, Independence, Stigma, and Self-Esteem and the Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools-Objective Out and About, Social Relations, and Productivity subscales.

Results: We performed a hierarchical regression to determine the unique association of different participation dimensions to Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities. The Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools-Objective scores, representing the frequency of participation in activities, explained 18% of the variance (R² change = .177, p < .001) in Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities. Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities and Independence, representing a person's perceived participation ability, explained 40% of the variance (R² change = .397, p < .001) when added to the model. Stigma and Self-Esteem uniquely explained 8% of the variance (R² change = .079, p < .001) when added to the model.

Conclusion/implications: A person's self-perceived ability to participate and be independent makes a greater contribution to satisfaction with social participation than the frequency of participation. Enhanced understanding of the interplay of subjective and objective factors in influencing participation satisfaction after TBI may result in more effective interventions to support meaningful participation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

参与的维度作为创伤性脑损伤后角色和能力满意度的预测因子。
目的:探讨创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者参与维度与社会角色和活动满意度的关系。研究方法/设计:对参加MoodTracker干预试验(https://ClinicalTrials.gov识别码NCT04410770)的127名参与者的基线数据进行二次分析。参与者(年龄= 35.24)主要是男性(64.6%)和非西班牙裔白人(70.1%)。主要测量是TBI生活质量量表,包括参与社会角色和活动的能力满意度,参与社会角色和活动的能力,独立性,污名和自尊,以及使用重组工具的参与评估-目标外出,社会关系和生产力子量表。结果:我们进行了层次回归,以确定不同参与维度对社会角色和活动满意度的独特关联。使用重组工具的参与评估-客观分数,代表参与活动的频率,解释了18%的方差(R²变化= .177,p < .001)对社会角色和活动的满意度。参与社会角色和活动的能力和独立性,代表一个人感知的参与能力,解释了40%的方差(R²变化= .397,p < .001),当加入模型时。当加入模型时,耻辱和自尊唯一地解释了8%的方差(R²变化= 0.079,p < 0.001)。结论/启示:一个人自我感知的参与和独立能力比参与频率对社会参与满意度的贡献更大。加深对影响创伤后参与满意度的主观和客观因素的相互作用的理解,可能会导致更有效的干预措施,以支持有意义的参与。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Psychology is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles in furtherance of the mission of Division 22 (Rehabilitation Psychology) of the American Psychological Association and to advance the science and practice of rehabilitation psychology. Rehabilitation psychologists consider the entire network of biological, psychological, social, environmental, and political factors that affect the functioning of persons with disabilities or chronic illness. Given the breadth of rehabilitation psychology, the journal"s scope is broadly defined.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信