Patients' Views on Paying to Participate in Clinical Trials.

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Nyiramugisha Niyibizi, Tekiah McClary, Margie Dixon, April Liao, Candace D Speight, Ayannah Lang, Neal W Dickert, Rebecca D Pentz
{"title":"Patients' Views on Paying to Participate in Clinical Trials.","authors":"Nyiramugisha Niyibizi, Tekiah McClary, Margie Dixon, April Liao, Candace D Speight, Ayannah Lang, Neal W Dickert, Rebecca D Pentz","doi":"10.1080/23294515.2025.2526325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical trials of medical therapies are critical for the advancement of care and are expensive. Sometimes, the costs of study drugs are not covered by insurance or the sponsor, and trial participants bear the costs. Participant costs in trials have been ethically controversial; review boards must decide whether to approve these trials and how to address costs. Because little is known about how participants view these costs, we evaluated patients' perspectives about being asked to pay for drugs in a clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed 33 patients recruited from oncology and cardiology clinics. Interviews included two hypothetical scenarios of trials involving costs: (1) a randomized trial of two current medications with moderate but different out-of-pocket costs; and (2) a trial involving a more expensive investigational drug. Patients were asked to share reactions, concerns, preferences about being approached, and what should happen if removed from the trial due to safety concerns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients expressed a variety of concerns and expectations associated with being asked to bear trial costs, as well as suggestions to reduce costs to research participants. Concerns included the study drug expense, fairness of asking research participants to bear study costs, and that disadvantaged individuals could be excluded. Despite sharing these concerns, patients prioritized autonomy in allowing patients to decide whether to participate, felt that \"pay-to-participate\" trials should be allowed to occur, and thought potential benefits from trial interventions, along with personal financial situation, would drive participation decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite mixed reactions about being asked to pay for study drugs, the majority of patients felt that people should not be prevented from having the option to participate and thus that these trials should not be prohibited. Continued understanding of patient views of research participation and the costs involved can guide how review boards and researchers address these trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":38118,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12233191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2025.2526325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical trials of medical therapies are critical for the advancement of care and are expensive. Sometimes, the costs of study drugs are not covered by insurance or the sponsor, and trial participants bear the costs. Participant costs in trials have been ethically controversial; review boards must decide whether to approve these trials and how to address costs. Because little is known about how participants view these costs, we evaluated patients' perspectives about being asked to pay for drugs in a clinical trial.

Methods: We interviewed 33 patients recruited from oncology and cardiology clinics. Interviews included two hypothetical scenarios of trials involving costs: (1) a randomized trial of two current medications with moderate but different out-of-pocket costs; and (2) a trial involving a more expensive investigational drug. Patients were asked to share reactions, concerns, preferences about being approached, and what should happen if removed from the trial due to safety concerns.

Results: Patients expressed a variety of concerns and expectations associated with being asked to bear trial costs, as well as suggestions to reduce costs to research participants. Concerns included the study drug expense, fairness of asking research participants to bear study costs, and that disadvantaged individuals could be excluded. Despite sharing these concerns, patients prioritized autonomy in allowing patients to decide whether to participate, felt that "pay-to-participate" trials should be allowed to occur, and thought potential benefits from trial interventions, along with personal financial situation, would drive participation decisions.

Conclusions: Despite mixed reactions about being asked to pay for study drugs, the majority of patients felt that people should not be prevented from having the option to participate and thus that these trials should not be prohibited. Continued understanding of patient views of research participation and the costs involved can guide how review boards and researchers address these trials.

患者对付费参加临床试验的看法。
背景:医学治疗的临床试验对提高护理水平至关重要,而且费用昂贵。有时,研究药物的费用不包括在保险公司或赞助商的范围内,由试验参与者承担费用。参与试验的成本在伦理上一直存在争议;审查委员会必须决定是否批准这些试验以及如何解决成本问题。由于对参与者如何看待这些成本知之甚少,我们评估了患者在临床试验中被要求支付药物费用的观点。方法:我们从肿瘤科和心脏病科门诊招募了33例患者。访谈包括两种涉及成本的试验假设情景:(1)随机试验两种现有药物,其自费费用适中但不同;(2)涉及更昂贵的研究药物的试验。患者被要求分享对被接近的反应、担忧、偏好,以及如果出于安全考虑而退出试验将会发生什么。结果:患者对被要求承担试验费用表达了各种担忧和期望,并向研究参与者提出了降低成本的建议。人们的担忧包括研究药物费用、要求研究参与者承担研究费用的公平性,以及弱势群体可能被排除在外。尽管存在这些担忧,但患者优先考虑让患者自主决定是否参与,认为应该允许进行“付费参与”试验,并认为试验干预的潜在利益以及个人财务状况将推动参与决策。结论:尽管对要求支付研究药物的反应不一,但大多数患者认为不应该阻止人们有参与的选择,因此不应该禁止这些试验。继续了解患者对参与研究的看法和所涉及的费用可以指导审查委员会和研究人员如何处理这些试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJOB Empirical Bioethics
AJOB Empirical Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信