Health systems and quality of life: The situation of South Africans with spinal cord injury.

IF 1 Q4 REHABILITATION
South African Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2025-06-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajp.v81i1.2133
Eugene Nizeyimana, Anthea Rhoda, Joyce Mothabeng, Francois Theron, Conran Joseph
{"title":"Health systems and quality of life: The situation of South Africans with spinal cord injury.","authors":"Eugene Nizeyimana, Anthea Rhoda, Joyce Mothabeng, Francois Theron, Conran Joseph","doi":"10.4102/sajp.v81i1.2133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal cord injury (SCI) significantly impacts quality of life (QoL) through physical disabilities and reduced social participation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compared health system indicators, social factors and self-reported QoL between individuals with SCI accessing public versus private healthcare in South Africa.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional survey using the International Spinal Cord Injury (InSCI) community survey questionnaire was conducted with 200 SCI individuals (156 public, 44 private sector) from Cape Town and Pretoria. Chi-square tests and correlation analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant disparities were observed between cohorts. Public sector participants reported higher rates of disability pension receipt (82.1% vs 54.5%) and greater challenges accessing various services. Overall, self-reported QoL was 56%, with the private cohort reporting significantly higher satisfaction (64% vs 52%). Private sector participants also reported higher satisfaction with living conditions and personal relationships. Access to disability pension and healthcare negatively correlated with QoL, while access to public spaces, medication, transport and nursing care positively correlated with QoL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reveals significant disparities in health system performance, social factors and QoL between SCI individuals accessing public versus private healthcare in South Africa.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Findings highlight the need to address systemic inequities in healthcare access and social support for individuals with SCI to improve QoL across sectors.</p>","PeriodicalId":44180,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"81 1","pages":"2133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12224068/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v81i1.2133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) significantly impacts quality of life (QoL) through physical disabilities and reduced social participation.

Objectives: This study compared health system indicators, social factors and self-reported QoL between individuals with SCI accessing public versus private healthcare in South Africa.

Method: A cross-sectional survey using the International Spinal Cord Injury (InSCI) community survey questionnaire was conducted with 200 SCI individuals (156 public, 44 private sector) from Cape Town and Pretoria. Chi-square tests and correlation analyses were performed.

Results: Significant disparities were observed between cohorts. Public sector participants reported higher rates of disability pension receipt (82.1% vs 54.5%) and greater challenges accessing various services. Overall, self-reported QoL was 56%, with the private cohort reporting significantly higher satisfaction (64% vs 52%). Private sector participants also reported higher satisfaction with living conditions and personal relationships. Access to disability pension and healthcare negatively correlated with QoL, while access to public spaces, medication, transport and nursing care positively correlated with QoL.

Conclusion: This study reveals significant disparities in health system performance, social factors and QoL between SCI individuals accessing public versus private healthcare in South Africa.

Clinical implications: Findings highlight the need to address systemic inequities in healthcare access and social support for individuals with SCI to improve QoL across sectors.

卫生系统和生活质量:南非脊髓损伤患者的情况。
背景:脊髓损伤(SCI)通过身体残疾和社会参与减少显著影响生活质量(QoL)。目的:本研究比较了南非接受公立和私立医疗保健的脊髓损伤患者的卫生系统指标、社会因素和自我报告的生活质量。方法:采用国际脊髓损伤(InSCI)社区调查问卷对来自开普敦和比勒陀利亚的200名脊髓损伤患者(156名公共部门,44名私营部门)进行横断面调查。进行卡方检验和相关分析。结果:队列间存在显著差异。公共部门的参与者报告了更高的残疾养老金领取率(82.1%对54.5%),以及获得各种服务的更大挑战。总体而言,自我报告的生活质量为56%,而私人队列报告的满意度明显更高(64%对52%)。私营部门的参与者也报告了对生活条件和人际关系的更高满意度。获得残疾养恤金和医疗保健与生活质量呈负相关,而获得公共空间、药物、交通和护理与生活质量呈正相关。结论:本研究揭示了南非脊髓损伤患者在卫生系统绩效、社会因素和生活质量方面的显著差异。临床意义:研究结果强调需要解决脊髓损伤患者在医疗保健获取和社会支持方面的系统性不平等问题,以改善各个部门的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信