Liver resection following neoadjuvant immunotherapy: a single center retrospective study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Vanja Podrascanin, Markus Ammann, Yawen Dong, Cornelius A Thiels, Susanne G Warner, Mark J Truty, Michael L Kendrick, Rory L Smoot, David M Nagorney, Patrick P Starlinger
{"title":"Liver resection following neoadjuvant immunotherapy: a single center retrospective study.","authors":"Vanja Podrascanin, Markus Ammann, Yawen Dong, Cornelius A Thiels, Susanne G Warner, Mark J Truty, Michael L Kendrick, Rory L Smoot, David M Nagorney, Patrick P Starlinger","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02310-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Liver resection remains an important treatment approach in both primary and metastatic liver malignancies. However, the impact of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy on surgical outcomes remains incompletely explored. This study aimed to evaluate safety and surgical and oncological outcomes of liver resections after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. This retrospective single-institution analysis included a total of 20 patients receiving immunotherapy (Pembrolizumab, Durvalumab or Atezolizumab) prior to hepatic resection at Mayo Clinic Rochester from February 2019 until October 2023. Surgical outcomes as well as radiological and pathological response were assessed. A total of 20 patients were identified. The cohort comprised primary liver cancer (n = 5), colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) (n = 4), and non-CRLM (n = 11). Overall, severe postoperative morbidity was observed in 4 patients, with 2 cases of post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF Grade B) and no postoperative mortality within 90 days. Histopathological examination delineated complete pathological response (pCR) response in 10 out of 16 evaluated patients, of whom one experienced recurrence within our follow-up period. Radiological response did not correlate with pathological response. Neoadjuvant ICI therapy showed excellent pathological response rates in highly selected patients, while maintaining surgical safety and expected postoperative morbidity. Standard radiological assessment appears to be insufficient to predict pCR.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02310-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Liver resection remains an important treatment approach in both primary and metastatic liver malignancies. However, the impact of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy on surgical outcomes remains incompletely explored. This study aimed to evaluate safety and surgical and oncological outcomes of liver resections after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. This retrospective single-institution analysis included a total of 20 patients receiving immunotherapy (Pembrolizumab, Durvalumab or Atezolizumab) prior to hepatic resection at Mayo Clinic Rochester from February 2019 until October 2023. Surgical outcomes as well as radiological and pathological response were assessed. A total of 20 patients were identified. The cohort comprised primary liver cancer (n = 5), colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) (n = 4), and non-CRLM (n = 11). Overall, severe postoperative morbidity was observed in 4 patients, with 2 cases of post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF Grade B) and no postoperative mortality within 90 days. Histopathological examination delineated complete pathological response (pCR) response in 10 out of 16 evaluated patients, of whom one experienced recurrence within our follow-up period. Radiological response did not correlate with pathological response. Neoadjuvant ICI therapy showed excellent pathological response rates in highly selected patients, while maintaining surgical safety and expected postoperative morbidity. Standard radiological assessment appears to be insufficient to predict pCR.

新辅助免疫治疗后肝切除:单中心回顾性研究。
肝切除术仍然是原发性和转移性肝恶性肿瘤的重要治疗方法。然而,新辅助免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗对手术结果的影响仍未完全探索。本研究旨在评估新辅助免疫治疗后肝切除的安全性和手术及肿瘤预后。这项回顾性单机构分析包括2019年2月至2023年10月在罗切斯特梅奥诊所接受肝切除术前接受免疫治疗(Pembrolizumab, Durvalumab或Atezolizumab)的20例患者。评估手术结果以及放射学和病理反应。共发现20例患者。该队列包括原发性肝癌(n = 5)、结直肠癌肝转移(n = 4)和非结直肠癌肝转移(n = 11)。总体而言,4例患者术后出现严重并发症,其中2例肝切除术后肝功能衰竭(PHLF分级B级),术后90天内无死亡。组织病理学检查描述了16例评估患者中10例的完全病理反应(pCR)反应,其中1例在我们的随访期间复发。放射学反应与病理反应无相关性。新辅助ICI治疗在高选择性患者中表现出优异的病理反应率,同时保持手术安全性和预期的术后发病率。标准放射学评估似乎不足以预测聚合酶链反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信