Proposed Reformulation of Brain Injury Criteria (BrIC) Using Head Rotation-Induced Brain Injury Thresholds Simulated and Derived Directly from A Subhuman Primate Finite Element Model.

Q2 Medicine
Dominic R Demma, Ying Tao, Liying Zhang, Priya Prasad
{"title":"Proposed Reformulation of Brain Injury Criteria (BrIC) Using Head Rotation-Induced Brain Injury Thresholds Simulated and Derived Directly from A Subhuman Primate Finite Element Model.","authors":"Dominic R Demma, Ying Tao, Liying Zhang, Priya Prasad","doi":"10.4271/2025-22-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent studies have found that Brain Injury Criteria (BrIC) grossly overpredicts instances of real-world, severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, as it stands, BrIC is the leading candidate for a rotational head kinematics-based brain injury criteria for use in automotive regulation and general safety standards. This study attempts to understand why BrIC overpredicts the likelihood of brain injury by presenting a comprehensive analysis of live primate head impact experiments conducted by Stalnaker et al. (1977) and the University of Pennsylvania before applying these injurious conditions to a finite element (FE) monkey model. Data collection included a thorough analysis and digitization of the head impact dynamics and resulting pathology reports from Stalnaker et al. (1977) as well as a representative reconstruction of the Penn II baboon diffuse axonal injury (DAI) model. Computational modeling techniques were employed on a FE Rhesus monkey model, first introduced by Arora et al. (2019), to derive risk related brain tissue strain thresholds from the laboratory data. The existing critical velocities proposed for BrIC were then scaled until the target strain level associated with each severity level of diffuse brain injury was reproduced in the FE model of the human brain. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive understanding of these two historical non-human primates (NHP) models and predicts a strain based diffuse tissue injury threshold (MPS99.9) of 1.0 and 1.6 for concussion (mild TBI) and DAI (severe TBI), respectively. The findings indicate scale factors of 1.6 to 5.9 times the original BrIC critical velocities, depending on the loading duration, are required to predict severe (AIS 4+) diffuse brain injury. These results allude to a necessity for including angular acceleration and duration as kinematic parameters in an injury criterion that can accurately predict real-world, diffuse brain injuries. This study also attempts to evaluate and recommend a methodology for post-processing strain parameters produced by head models, settling on the use of MPS99.9 and CSDM50.</p>","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"69 1","pages":"51-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stapp car crash journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2025-22-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent studies have found that Brain Injury Criteria (BrIC) grossly overpredicts instances of real-world, severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, as it stands, BrIC is the leading candidate for a rotational head kinematics-based brain injury criteria for use in automotive regulation and general safety standards. This study attempts to understand why BrIC overpredicts the likelihood of brain injury by presenting a comprehensive analysis of live primate head impact experiments conducted by Stalnaker et al. (1977) and the University of Pennsylvania before applying these injurious conditions to a finite element (FE) monkey model. Data collection included a thorough analysis and digitization of the head impact dynamics and resulting pathology reports from Stalnaker et al. (1977) as well as a representative reconstruction of the Penn II baboon diffuse axonal injury (DAI) model. Computational modeling techniques were employed on a FE Rhesus monkey model, first introduced by Arora et al. (2019), to derive risk related brain tissue strain thresholds from the laboratory data. The existing critical velocities proposed for BrIC were then scaled until the target strain level associated with each severity level of diffuse brain injury was reproduced in the FE model of the human brain. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive understanding of these two historical non-human primates (NHP) models and predicts a strain based diffuse tissue injury threshold (MPS99.9) of 1.0 and 1.6 for concussion (mild TBI) and DAI (severe TBI), respectively. The findings indicate scale factors of 1.6 to 5.9 times the original BrIC critical velocities, depending on the loading duration, are required to predict severe (AIS 4+) diffuse brain injury. These results allude to a necessity for including angular acceleration and duration as kinematic parameters in an injury criterion that can accurately predict real-world, diffuse brain injuries. This study also attempts to evaluate and recommend a methodology for post-processing strain parameters produced by head models, settling on the use of MPS99.9 and CSDM50.

利用模拟并直接从亚人类灵长类动物有限元模型中导出的头部旋转引起的脑损伤阈值,提出了脑损伤标准(BrIC)的重新制定。
最近的研究发现,脑损伤标准(BrIC)严重高估了现实世界中严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的情况。然而,就目前而言,BrIC是基于旋转头部运动学的脑损伤标准的主要候选者,可用于汽车法规和一般安全标准。在将这些损伤条件应用于有限元(FE)猴子模型之前,本研究通过对Stalnaker等人(1977)和宾夕法尼亚大学进行的活体灵长类动物头部撞击实验进行全面分析,试图理解BrIC过度预测脑损伤可能性的原因。数据收集包括对Stalnaker等人(1977)的头部撞击动力学和由此产生的病理报告进行全面分析和数字化,以及对Penn II型狒狒弥漫性轴索损伤(DAI)模型进行代表性重建。计算建模技术应用于由Arora等人(2019)首次引入的FE恒河猴模型,从实验室数据中得出与风险相关的脑组织应变阈值。然后对BrIC提出的现有临界速度进行缩放,直到在人脑FE模型中再现与弥漫性脑损伤的每个严重程度相关的目标应变水平。总的来说,本研究提供了对这两种历史上的非人灵长类动物(NHP)模型的全面理解,并预测了基于应变的弥漫性组织损伤阈值(MPS99.9)分别为1.0和1.6脑震荡(轻度TBI)和DAI(重度TBI)。研究结果表明,根据加载时间的不同,预测严重(AIS 4+)弥漫性脑损伤所需的尺度因子为原始BrIC临界速度的1.6至5.9倍。这些结果暗示有必要将角加速度和持续时间作为损伤标准的运动学参数,以准确预测现实世界的弥漫性脑损伤。本研究还试图评估和推荐一种方法,用于后处理由头部模型产生的应变参数,确定使用MPS99.9和CSDM50。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stapp car crash journal
Stapp car crash journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信