Medical practitioner compassion: Development and validation of a compassion competency questionnaire.

African Journal of Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2025-06-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4102/ajopa.v7i0.170
Michelle Jäckel-Visser, Carl C Theron, Robert J Mash
{"title":"Medical practitioner compassion: Development and validation of a compassion competency questionnaire.","authors":"Michelle Jäckel-Visser, Carl C Theron, Robert J Mash","doi":"10.4102/ajopa.v7i0.170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a need for a psychometrically robust questionnaire measuring medical practitioner compassion in healthcare. Without such a measure, competence on this construct cannot be assessed, nor can the effectiveness of interventions designed to enhance compassion be determined. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a self-assessment measure of medical practitioner compassion competence (the Medical Practitioner Compassion Competency Questionnaire [MPCCQ]). The MPCCQ was administered to a sample of 234 medical practitioners in South Africa. They represented three healthcare system levels, namely, the primary level (healthcare centres and clinics), the secondary level (district and regional hospitals) and the tertiary level (central, specialised and sub-specialist hospitals). The quantitative data were analysed with statistical packages, namely, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25 and LISREL 8.8, and structural equation modelling was used to fit the MPCCQ measurement model and structural model. Dimensionality and item analyses returned generally positive results. Fit statistics and criteria used to judge the fit of the models included Chi-square (χ<sup>2</sup>), goodness of fit index (GFI), adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), root mean square residual (RMR) and the standardised root mean square residual (SRMR). The results provided an excellent model fit for both the measurement and comprehensive LISREL models. The MPCCQ, measurement and structural model parameter estimates supported the position that the design intention underpinning the MPCCQ succeeded.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>The statistical evidence generated thus far failed to refute the position that the MPCCQ shows construct validity, thus paving the way for the cautious utilisation of the instrument in healthcare and medical education institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":34043,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Psychological Assessment","volume":"7 ","pages":"170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12224002/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajopa.v7i0.170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a need for a psychometrically robust questionnaire measuring medical practitioner compassion in healthcare. Without such a measure, competence on this construct cannot be assessed, nor can the effectiveness of interventions designed to enhance compassion be determined. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a self-assessment measure of medical practitioner compassion competence (the Medical Practitioner Compassion Competency Questionnaire [MPCCQ]). The MPCCQ was administered to a sample of 234 medical practitioners in South Africa. They represented three healthcare system levels, namely, the primary level (healthcare centres and clinics), the secondary level (district and regional hospitals) and the tertiary level (central, specialised and sub-specialist hospitals). The quantitative data were analysed with statistical packages, namely, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25 and LISREL 8.8, and structural equation modelling was used to fit the MPCCQ measurement model and structural model. Dimensionality and item analyses returned generally positive results. Fit statistics and criteria used to judge the fit of the models included Chi-square (χ2), goodness of fit index (GFI), adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), root mean square residual (RMR) and the standardised root mean square residual (SRMR). The results provided an excellent model fit for both the measurement and comprehensive LISREL models. The MPCCQ, measurement and structural model parameter estimates supported the position that the design intention underpinning the MPCCQ succeeded.

Contribution: The statistical evidence generated thus far failed to refute the position that the MPCCQ shows construct validity, thus paving the way for the cautious utilisation of the instrument in healthcare and medical education institutions.

医生的同情心:同情心能力问卷的开发和验证。
需要一份心理测量学上强有力的问卷来测量医疗从业者的同情心。没有这样的措施,就无法评估这一结构的能力,也无法确定旨在增强同情心的干预措施的有效性。本研究的目的是开发和验证一种医生同情能力的自我评估量表(医生同情能力问卷[MPCCQ])。MPCCQ对南非的234名医生进行了抽样调查。他们代表了三个医疗系统级别,即初级级别(医疗中心和诊所),二级级别(地区和地区医院)和三级级别(中央,专科和专科医院)。采用SPSS (statistical Package for The Social Sciences)第25版和LISREL 8.8统计软件包对定量数据进行分析,采用结构方程模型对MPCCQ测量模型和结构模型进行拟合。维度和项目分析的结果总体上是肯定的。拟合统计量和判断模型拟合的标准包括χ2、拟合优度指数(GFI)、调整后的拟合优度指数(AGFI)、近似均方根误差(RMSEA)、均方根残差(RMR)和标准化均方根残差(SRMR)。结果为测量和综合LISREL模型提供了一个很好的模型拟合。MPCCQ、测量和结构模型参数估计支持了MPCCQ的设计意图是成功的。贡献:迄今为止产生的统计证据未能反驳MPCCQ显示结构效度的立场,从而为医疗保健和医学教育机构谨慎使用该工具铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信