Coping with Ineffective Overlap in Multilocus Phylogenetics.

IF 5.7 1区 生物学 Q1 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Ana Serra Silva, Karen Siu-Ting, Christopher J Creevey, Davide Pisani, Mark Wilkinson
{"title":"Coping with Ineffective Overlap in Multilocus Phylogenetics.","authors":"Ana Serra Silva, Karen Siu-Ting, Christopher J Creevey, Davide Pisani, Mark Wilkinson","doi":"10.1093/sysbio/syaf044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Missing data is a long standing issue in phylogenetic inference, which often results in high levels of taxonomic instability, obscuring otherwise well supported relationships. Multiple approaches have been developed to deal with the negative effects of ineffective overlap on tree resolution, often by identifying taxa for removal. Here we repurpose a heuristic method developed to identify unstable taxa in morphological data matrices, concatabominations, and combine it with a novel gene-tree jackknifing on matrix representation of trees to identify candidates for targeted sequencing. Using a multilocus caecilian dataset we illustrate the method's capacity to identify candidate taxa and loci for additional sequencing, compare the results to those of the mathematics-based gene sampling sufficiency approach and explore the terrace space associated with the multilocus dataset. We show that our approach yields tractable numbers of loci/taxa for targeted sequencing that successfully mitigate topological instability due to ineffective overlap, even when modest amounts of data are added.</p>","PeriodicalId":22120,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syaf044","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Missing data is a long standing issue in phylogenetic inference, which often results in high levels of taxonomic instability, obscuring otherwise well supported relationships. Multiple approaches have been developed to deal with the negative effects of ineffective overlap on tree resolution, often by identifying taxa for removal. Here we repurpose a heuristic method developed to identify unstable taxa in morphological data matrices, concatabominations, and combine it with a novel gene-tree jackknifing on matrix representation of trees to identify candidates for targeted sequencing. Using a multilocus caecilian dataset we illustrate the method's capacity to identify candidate taxa and loci for additional sequencing, compare the results to those of the mathematics-based gene sampling sufficiency approach and explore the terrace space associated with the multilocus dataset. We show that our approach yields tractable numbers of loci/taxa for targeted sequencing that successfully mitigate topological instability due to ineffective overlap, even when modest amounts of data are added.

多位点系统发育中无效重叠的处理。
在系统发育推断中,数据缺失是一个长期存在的问题,它经常导致高度的分类不稳定性,模糊了其他得到良好支持的关系。已经开发了多种方法来处理无效重叠对树分辨率的负面影响,通常是通过确定要移除的分类群。在这里,我们重新利用一种启发式方法来识别形态学数据矩阵中不稳定的分类群,并将其与一种新的基于树的矩阵表示的基因树jackkning相结合,以确定目标测序的候选物种。利用一个多位点的蛭形生物数据集,我们说明了该方法识别候选分类群和基因座的能力,并将结果与基于数学的基因采样充分性方法进行了比较,并探索了与多位点数据集相关的平台空间。我们表明,即使添加适量的数据,我们的方法也能产生可处理的位点/分类群数量,用于靶向测序,成功地减轻了由于无效重叠造成的拓扑不稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Biology
Systematic Biology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
70
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Biology is the bimonthly journal of the Society of Systematic Biologists. Papers for the journal are original contributions to the theory, principles, and methods of systematics as well as phylogeny, evolution, morphology, biogeography, paleontology, genetics, and the classification of all living things. A Points of View section offers a forum for discussion, while book reviews and announcements of general interest are also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信