Sandra Proelss, Mehmed Tuncer, Christine Heim, John-Dylan Haynes, Peter Vaikoczy, Michael Brecht, Katharina Faust
{"title":"Males but not females report genital sensations evoked by fixed-parameter stimulation of somatosensory cortex.","authors":"Sandra Proelss, Mehmed Tuncer, Christine Heim, John-Dylan Haynes, Peter Vaikoczy, Michael Brecht, Katharina Faust","doi":"10.1093/brain/awaf240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The localisation of the human genital cortex has been debated since its unusual placement in Penfield's somatosensory homunculus. While male and female genitalia are different, it remains unclear how these external differences are mapped onto the male and female brain. We investigated genital representation in the human somatosensory cortex by patient-report of sensations evoked by fixed parameter electrical stimulation during awake craniotomies. We find a reproducible genital representation in male subjects (n = 3) at the somatotopically appropriate location between the legs situated in the dorsal postcentral gyrus and sulcus. Our findings contradict early stimulation-maps derived by Penfield and colleagues, which indicated an absence of genital responses in this brain region, but align with more recent imaging data from males and females that described blood-flow responses to genital stimulation at these coordinates. Surprisingly, however, we find no evidence for stimulation-evoked genital sensations in the postcentral gyrus and sulcus of females (n = 5) in line with Penfield's earlier conclusions. Specifically, females reported no genital sensations, but often leg sensations, when stimulated at the putative coordinates of female genital cortex. We conclude that reports of genital sensations differ between male and female somatosensory cortex upon stimulation. Our observations add to the growing evidence that genital representations differ between males and females.</p>","PeriodicalId":9063,"journal":{"name":"Brain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaf240","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The localisation of the human genital cortex has been debated since its unusual placement in Penfield's somatosensory homunculus. While male and female genitalia are different, it remains unclear how these external differences are mapped onto the male and female brain. We investigated genital representation in the human somatosensory cortex by patient-report of sensations evoked by fixed parameter electrical stimulation during awake craniotomies. We find a reproducible genital representation in male subjects (n = 3) at the somatotopically appropriate location between the legs situated in the dorsal postcentral gyrus and sulcus. Our findings contradict early stimulation-maps derived by Penfield and colleagues, which indicated an absence of genital responses in this brain region, but align with more recent imaging data from males and females that described blood-flow responses to genital stimulation at these coordinates. Surprisingly, however, we find no evidence for stimulation-evoked genital sensations in the postcentral gyrus and sulcus of females (n = 5) in line with Penfield's earlier conclusions. Specifically, females reported no genital sensations, but often leg sensations, when stimulated at the putative coordinates of female genital cortex. We conclude that reports of genital sensations differ between male and female somatosensory cortex upon stimulation. Our observations add to the growing evidence that genital representations differ between males and females.
期刊介绍:
Brain, a journal focused on clinical neurology and translational neuroscience, has been publishing landmark papers since 1878. The journal aims to expand its scope by including studies that shed light on disease mechanisms and conducting innovative clinical trials for brain disorders. With a wide range of topics covered, the Editorial Board represents the international readership and diverse coverage of the journal. Accepted articles are promptly posted online, typically within a few weeks of acceptance. As of 2022, Brain holds an impressive impact factor of 14.5, according to the Journal Citation Reports.