Changes and backlogs in the provision and utilization of essential health services in Afghanistan during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Narges Neyazi, Ali Mirzazadeh, Abdul Ghani Ibrahimi, Ahmad Mirwais Ahmadzai, Jamshed Ali Tanoli
{"title":"Changes and backlogs in the provision and utilization of essential health services in Afghanistan during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Narges Neyazi, Ali Mirzazadeh, Abdul Ghani Ibrahimi, Ahmad Mirwais Ahmadzai, Jamshed Ali Tanoli","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-13093-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Afghanistan is a low-income country where providing essential healthcare services is lifesaving for millions. The COVID-19 pandemic, the government and the international aid changes have affected the overburdened and fragile health system and put a risk on universal health coverage in Afghanistan. In this study, we aim to study the changes and backlogs to the essential health services during and after COVID-19 pandemic (Feb 2020 to Sep 2022) in Afghanistan.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study of health facilities was conducted in nine provinces of Afghanistan. A randomly selected 165 public and private primary care centers and hospitals in 49 districts were studied. A WHO standardized questionnaire was used for this survey. Trained staff met the facility managers in person and completed the questionnaire by individual interviews during September 2022.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Hospitals located mostly in urban areas (n = 39, 65%) and clinics were located mostly in rural areas (n = 74, 71.1%) and governed by the government and the NGOs (76.6% of hospitals and 84.7% of clinics). The average number of staff per facility was 118 (SD = 180) for hospitals and 16(SD = 7) for clinics. 27 (46.5%) of hospitals and 44 (41.9%) of clinics reported that they experienced a higher outpatient service utilization in the previous month, compared to the month before. nearly half of the backlogs during the pandemic were related to routine preventive services such as annual check-ups antenatal care, and childhood immunization (55.0% for hospitals, and 45.7% for clinics). prioritizing high risk patients (86.7%), promoting self-care interventions wherever appropriate (75.0%), redirecting patients to alternative healthcare facilities (73.3%), providing all care in a single visit for multiple morbidities (60.0%), and providing home-based care for certain patients (58.3%) in hospitals. However, the most used strategies in clinics were prioritizing high risk patients (93.3%), redirecting patients to alternative healthcare facilities (75.2%), and providing home-based care for certain patients (66.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pandemic exacerbated existing health inequities and hindered progress toward Universal Health Coverage (UHC). Health facilities employed various strategies to cope with the disruptions, such as prioritizing high-risk patients, promoting self-care, and redirecting patients to alternative facilities. However, the increased cost of transportation and health services, along with limited availability of medicines, remained significant barriers to healthcare access.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"923"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13093-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Afghanistan is a low-income country where providing essential healthcare services is lifesaving for millions. The COVID-19 pandemic, the government and the international aid changes have affected the overburdened and fragile health system and put a risk on universal health coverage in Afghanistan. In this study, we aim to study the changes and backlogs to the essential health services during and after COVID-19 pandemic (Feb 2020 to Sep 2022) in Afghanistan.

Method: A cross-sectional study of health facilities was conducted in nine provinces of Afghanistan. A randomly selected 165 public and private primary care centers and hospitals in 49 districts were studied. A WHO standardized questionnaire was used for this survey. Trained staff met the facility managers in person and completed the questionnaire by individual interviews during September 2022.

Result: Hospitals located mostly in urban areas (n = 39, 65%) and clinics were located mostly in rural areas (n = 74, 71.1%) and governed by the government and the NGOs (76.6% of hospitals and 84.7% of clinics). The average number of staff per facility was 118 (SD = 180) for hospitals and 16(SD = 7) for clinics. 27 (46.5%) of hospitals and 44 (41.9%) of clinics reported that they experienced a higher outpatient service utilization in the previous month, compared to the month before. nearly half of the backlogs during the pandemic were related to routine preventive services such as annual check-ups antenatal care, and childhood immunization (55.0% for hospitals, and 45.7% for clinics). prioritizing high risk patients (86.7%), promoting self-care interventions wherever appropriate (75.0%), redirecting patients to alternative healthcare facilities (73.3%), providing all care in a single visit for multiple morbidities (60.0%), and providing home-based care for certain patients (58.3%) in hospitals. However, the most used strategies in clinics were prioritizing high risk patients (93.3%), redirecting patients to alternative healthcare facilities (75.2%), and providing home-based care for certain patients (66.7%).

Conclusion: The pandemic exacerbated existing health inequities and hindered progress toward Universal Health Coverage (UHC). Health facilities employed various strategies to cope with the disruptions, such as prioritizing high-risk patients, promoting self-care, and redirecting patients to alternative facilities. However, the increased cost of transportation and health services, along with limited availability of medicines, remained significant barriers to healthcare access.

在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间和之后,阿富汗提供和利用基本卫生服务方面的变化和积压。
简介:阿富汗是一个低收入国家,在这里,提供基本保健服务可以挽救数百万人的生命。COVID-19大流行、政府和国际援助的变化影响了负担过重和脆弱的卫生系统,并给阿富汗的全民健康覆盖带来了风险。在本研究中,我们旨在研究2019冠状病毒病大流行(2020年2月至2022年9月)期间和之后阿富汗基本卫生服务的变化和积压情况。方法:对阿富汗9个省的卫生设施进行了横断面研究。对49个地区随机选择的165个公立和私立初级保健中心和医院进行了研究。本次调查使用了世卫组织标准化问卷。经过培训的工作人员亲自会见了设施经理,并在2022年9月通过个人访谈完成了问卷调查。结果:医院主要分布在城市(n = 39, 65%),诊所主要分布在农村(n = 74, 71.1%),由政府和非政府组织管理(医院占76.6%,诊所占84.7%)。每个设施的平均工作人员人数,医院为118人(标准差= 180),诊所为16人(标准差= 7)。27家(46.5%)医院和44家(41.9%)诊所报告说,他们在上个月的门诊服务利用率比前一个月高。大流行期间,近一半的积压与常规预防服务有关,如年度检查、产前保健和儿童免疫接种(医院为55.0%,诊所为45.7%)。优先考虑高风险患者(86.7%),在适当情况下促进自我护理干预(75.0%),将患者转移到其他医疗机构(73.3%),在一次就诊中为多种疾病提供所有护理(60.0%),并在医院为某些患者提供家庭护理(58.3%)。然而,诊所最常用的策略是优先考虑高风险患者(93.3%),将患者转移到其他医疗机构(75.2%),以及为某些患者提供家庭护理(66.7%)。结论:大流行加剧了现有的卫生不公平现象,阻碍了全民健康覆盖(UHC)的进展。卫生机构采用了各种策略来应对这种中断,例如优先考虑高风险患者、促进自我保健以及将患者转到其他设施。然而,运输和保健服务成本的增加,加上药品供应有限,仍然是获得保健服务的重大障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信