{"title":"AI-ECG for early detection of atrial fibrillation: First-year results from a stroke prevention study in Shimizu, Japan","authors":"Mayumi Masumura MD, Atsuyuki Ohno MD, Haruhiko Yoshinaga MD, Takeshi Sasaki MD, Yasuteru Yamauchi MD, Hitoshi Hachiya MD, Atsushi Takahashi MD, Yasushi Imai MD, Hideo Fujita MD, Kensuke Ihara MD, Yusuke Ebana MD, Toshihiro Tanaka MD, Tetsushi Furukawa MD, Tetsuo Sasano MD","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>An artificial intelligence algorithm-guided electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) has been developed to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with sinus rhythm (SR). However, its utility for population-based screening remains unclear in Japan.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method and Results</h3>\n \n <p>In this prospective cohort study, “SPAFS” (Stroke Prevention by Early Detection of AF in Shimizu), participants who underwent health examinations at the Shimizu Medical Association Examination Center from January 2022 to July 2023 were enrolled, with known AF excluded. ECGs were categorized by AI as low-, moderate-, or high risk: non-SR were labeled as non-applicable (NA). All participants underwent 7-day single-lead ECG monitoring. Among 362 participants (61.1 ± 10.5 years, 38% male, CHADS2 score 0.49 ± 0.70), AF was newly detected in 3.0% (<i>n</i> = 11), with increasing prevalence across AI risk categories. The non-low-risk group (moderate, high, and NA) had a significantly higher AF detection rate than the low-risk group (OR 9.36, 95% CI 1.99–44.01). Subgroup analysis in those aged ≥65 years showed a similar trend (OR 8.09 [95%CI 1.63–39.7]). When the NA group (not eligible for AI) was excluded, similar trends were observed, although statistical significance was attenuated (OR 4.89 [95% CI 0.88–27.1] in the total, 5.09 [95% CI 0.89–29.0] in those aged ≥65 years). In the total cohort, AI-ECG showed higher discriminative ability than the CHADS<sub>2</sub> score ≥1 in both the total cohort (AUC 0.75 vs. 0.68) and participants aged ≥65 years (AUC 0.73 vs. 0.61).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>AI-ECG risk determination correlated with AF detection in a Japanese healthy cohort, especially in the aged population, supporting its utility as a population-based screening tool.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70132","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
An artificial intelligence algorithm-guided electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) has been developed to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with sinus rhythm (SR). However, its utility for population-based screening remains unclear in Japan.
Method and Results
In this prospective cohort study, “SPAFS” (Stroke Prevention by Early Detection of AF in Shimizu), participants who underwent health examinations at the Shimizu Medical Association Examination Center from January 2022 to July 2023 were enrolled, with known AF excluded. ECGs were categorized by AI as low-, moderate-, or high risk: non-SR were labeled as non-applicable (NA). All participants underwent 7-day single-lead ECG monitoring. Among 362 participants (61.1 ± 10.5 years, 38% male, CHADS2 score 0.49 ± 0.70), AF was newly detected in 3.0% (n = 11), with increasing prevalence across AI risk categories. The non-low-risk group (moderate, high, and NA) had a significantly higher AF detection rate than the low-risk group (OR 9.36, 95% CI 1.99–44.01). Subgroup analysis in those aged ≥65 years showed a similar trend (OR 8.09 [95%CI 1.63–39.7]). When the NA group (not eligible for AI) was excluded, similar trends were observed, although statistical significance was attenuated (OR 4.89 [95% CI 0.88–27.1] in the total, 5.09 [95% CI 0.89–29.0] in those aged ≥65 years). In the total cohort, AI-ECG showed higher discriminative ability than the CHADS2 score ≥1 in both the total cohort (AUC 0.75 vs. 0.68) and participants aged ≥65 years (AUC 0.73 vs. 0.61).
Conclusions
AI-ECG risk determination correlated with AF detection in a Japanese healthy cohort, especially in the aged population, supporting its utility as a population-based screening tool.
人工智能算法引导的心电图(AI-ECG)已被开发用于检测窦性心律(SR)患者的心房颤动(AF)。然而,在日本,它在基于人群的筛查中的效用尚不清楚。方法和结果在这项前瞻性队列研究“SPAFS”(通过在清水早期发现房颤预防中风)中,纳入了2022年1月至2023年7月在清水医学会检查中心接受健康检查的参与者,排除已知房颤。心电图被AI分类为低、中、高风险:非sr被标记为不适用(NA)。所有参与者均接受7天单导联心电图监测。在362名参与者(61.1±10.5岁,38%男性,CHADS2评分0.49±0.70)中,3.0% (n = 11)的人新发现房颤,在不同的AI风险类别中患病率呈上升趋势。非低危组(中度、高度和NA)的房颤检出率显著高于低危组(OR 9.36, 95% CI 1.99-44.01)。年龄≥65岁的亚组分析显示相似趋势(OR 8.09 [95%CI 1.63-39.7])。当排除NA组(不符合AI条件)时,观察到类似的趋势,尽管统计学显著性减弱(总OR为4.89 [95% CI 0.88-27.1],≥65岁的OR为5.09 [95% CI 0.89-29.0])。在总队列中,AI-ECG在总队列(AUC 0.75 vs. 0.68)和年龄≥65岁的受试者(AUC 0.73 vs. 0.61)中均表现出高于CHADS2评分≥1的判别能力。结论:在日本健康队列中,AI-ECG风险测定与房颤检测相关,特别是在老年人群中,支持其作为基于人群的筛查工具的实用性。