Ahmad Abul , Ali Abel , Mohammad Al-Saffar , Sara Iskeirjeh , Saif Badran
{"title":"Efficacy of closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy in abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Ahmad Abul , Ali Abel , Mohammad Al-Saffar , Sara Iskeirjeh , Saif Badran","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.06.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Abdominal-based free tissue transfers, such as the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap, are widely utilized in autologous breast reconstruction. These procedures are often complicated by wound healing issues at the donor site, including wound dehiscence, seroma formation, and surgical site infections (SSIs). Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (ciNPWT) has been suggested to improve healing outcomes and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications. This synthesis evaluated the efficacy of ciNPWT compared to standard dressings in abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies assessing ciNPWT versus standard dressings in patients undergoing abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction were included. Primary and secondary outcomes analyzed were wound dehiscence, SSIs, seroma formation, and length of stay. Data from multiple databases were independently reviewed and synthesized using Review Manager 5.4 and Microsoft Excel. Studies were rigorously selected and assessed for risk of bias.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 348 identified articles, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising three randomized controlled trials and 10 observational studies, totaling 2882 patients. The ciNPWT group showed a 42% reduction in wound dehiscence (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.42–0.79; p = 0.0007), with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 36%). No significant differences were found for surgical site infections (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.50–1.18; p = 0.23) and seroma formation (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.38–1.12; p = 0.15). Variations in length of stay data prevented quantitative analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ciNPWT demonstrates a significant reduction in wound dehiscence, highlighting its value in enhancing postoperative care, especially for high-risk patients. However, further research involving larger, multicenter randomized controlled trials is necessary to fully elucidate ciNPWT's role in reducing other complications and its broader clinical applicability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"107 ","pages":"Pages 151-161"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681525004061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Abdominal-based free tissue transfers, such as the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap, are widely utilized in autologous breast reconstruction. These procedures are often complicated by wound healing issues at the donor site, including wound dehiscence, seroma formation, and surgical site infections (SSIs). Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (ciNPWT) has been suggested to improve healing outcomes and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications. This synthesis evaluated the efficacy of ciNPWT compared to standard dressings in abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction.
Methods
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies assessing ciNPWT versus standard dressings in patients undergoing abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction were included. Primary and secondary outcomes analyzed were wound dehiscence, SSIs, seroma formation, and length of stay. Data from multiple databases were independently reviewed and synthesized using Review Manager 5.4 and Microsoft Excel. Studies were rigorously selected and assessed for risk of bias.
Results
Of the 348 identified articles, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising three randomized controlled trials and 10 observational studies, totaling 2882 patients. The ciNPWT group showed a 42% reduction in wound dehiscence (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.42–0.79; p = 0.0007), with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 36%). No significant differences were found for surgical site infections (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.50–1.18; p = 0.23) and seroma formation (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.38–1.12; p = 0.15). Variations in length of stay data prevented quantitative analysis.
Conclusion
ciNPWT demonstrates a significant reduction in wound dehiscence, highlighting its value in enhancing postoperative care, especially for high-risk patients. However, further research involving larger, multicenter randomized controlled trials is necessary to fully elucidate ciNPWT's role in reducing other complications and its broader clinical applicability.
期刊介绍:
JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery.
The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.