Efficacy of closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy in abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Ahmad Abul , Ali Abel , Mohammad Al-Saffar , Sara Iskeirjeh , Saif Badran
{"title":"Efficacy of closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy in abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Ahmad Abul ,&nbsp;Ali Abel ,&nbsp;Mohammad Al-Saffar ,&nbsp;Sara Iskeirjeh ,&nbsp;Saif Badran","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.06.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Abdominal-based free tissue transfers, such as the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap, are widely utilized in autologous breast reconstruction. These procedures are often complicated by wound healing issues at the donor site, including wound dehiscence, seroma formation, and surgical site infections (SSIs). Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (ciNPWT) has been suggested to improve healing outcomes and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications. This synthesis evaluated the efficacy of ciNPWT compared to standard dressings in abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies assessing ciNPWT versus standard dressings in patients undergoing abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction were included. Primary and secondary outcomes analyzed were wound dehiscence, SSIs, seroma formation, and length of stay. Data from multiple databases were independently reviewed and synthesized using Review Manager 5.4 and Microsoft Excel. Studies were rigorously selected and assessed for risk of bias.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 348 identified articles, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising three randomized controlled trials and 10 observational studies, totaling 2882 patients. The ciNPWT group showed a 42% reduction in wound dehiscence (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.42–0.79; p = 0.0007), with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 36%). No significant differences were found for surgical site infections (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.50–1.18; p = 0.23) and seroma formation (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.38–1.12; p = 0.15). Variations in length of stay data prevented quantitative analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ciNPWT demonstrates a significant reduction in wound dehiscence, highlighting its value in enhancing postoperative care, especially for high-risk patients. However, further research involving larger, multicenter randomized controlled trials is necessary to fully elucidate ciNPWT's role in reducing other complications and its broader clinical applicability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"107 ","pages":"Pages 151-161"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681525004061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Abdominal-based free tissue transfers, such as the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap, are widely utilized in autologous breast reconstruction. These procedures are often complicated by wound healing issues at the donor site, including wound dehiscence, seroma formation, and surgical site infections (SSIs). Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (ciNPWT) has been suggested to improve healing outcomes and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications. This synthesis evaluated the efficacy of ciNPWT compared to standard dressings in abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies assessing ciNPWT versus standard dressings in patients undergoing abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction were included. Primary and secondary outcomes analyzed were wound dehiscence, SSIs, seroma formation, and length of stay. Data from multiple databases were independently reviewed and synthesized using Review Manager 5.4 and Microsoft Excel. Studies were rigorously selected and assessed for risk of bias.

Results

Of the 348 identified articles, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising three randomized controlled trials and 10 observational studies, totaling 2882 patients. The ciNPWT group showed a 42% reduction in wound dehiscence (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.42–0.79; p = 0.0007), with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 36%). No significant differences were found for surgical site infections (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.50–1.18; p = 0.23) and seroma formation (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.38–1.12; p = 0.15). Variations in length of stay data prevented quantitative analysis.

Conclusion

ciNPWT demonstrates a significant reduction in wound dehiscence, highlighting its value in enhancing postoperative care, especially for high-risk patients. However, further research involving larger, multicenter randomized controlled trials is necessary to fully elucidate ciNPWT's role in reducing other complications and its broader clinical applicability.
闭式切口负压伤口治疗腹部自体乳房重建术的疗效:系统回顾和meta分析
以腹部为基础的游离组织移植,如腹下穿支皮瓣(DIEP),在自体乳房重建中被广泛应用。这些手术通常因供体部位的伤口愈合问题而复杂化,包括伤口裂开、血清形成和手术部位感染(ssi)。闭合切口负压伤口治疗(ciNPWT)被认为可以改善愈合效果并减少术后并发症的发生率。该综合评估了ciNPWT与标准敷料在腹部自体乳房重建中的疗效。方法按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。随机对照试验和观察性研究评估了ciNPWT与标准敷料在腹部自由皮瓣乳房重建患者中的应用。主要和次要结果分析为伤口裂开、ssi、血肿形成和住院时间。使用Review Manager 5.4和Microsoft Excel对来自多个数据库的数据进行独立评审和综合。对研究进行了严格的选择和偏倚风险评估。结果在348篇纳入的文献中,13项研究符合纳入标准,包括3项随机对照试验和10项观察性研究,共计2882例患者。ciNPWT组伤口裂开减少42% (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.42-0.79;p = 0.0007),异质性中等(I²= 36%)。手术部位感染无显著差异(OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.50-1.18;p = 0.23)和血清形成(OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.38-1.12;P = 0.15)。停留时间数据的差异妨碍了定量分析。结论cinpwt可显著减少创面裂开,突出了其在加强术后护理方面的价值,特别是对高危患者。然而,为了充分阐明ciNPWT在减少其他并发症方面的作用及其更广泛的临床适用性,还需要开展更大规模、多中心随机对照试验的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
578
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery. The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信