Oriol Pujol , Joan Minguell , Joan Pijoan , Miguel Nuño , Irene Portas-Torres , Marc Aguilar , Mercè Reverté , Martí Plomer , Enrique García-Albó , Nayana Joshi
{"title":"Preservation of preoperative CPAK is not associated with improved clinical outcomes one-year after functionally aligned robot-assisted TKA","authors":"Oriol Pujol , Joan Minguell , Joan Pijoan , Miguel Nuño , Irene Portas-Torres , Marc Aguilar , Mercè Reverté , Martí Plomer , Enrique García-Albó , Nayana Joshi","doi":"10.1016/j.jor.2025.06.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To determine if maintaining the preoperative CPAK class influences on clinical outcomes when performing a functional aligned robotic assisted TKA (RATKA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective cohort study compared patients who maintained their preoperative CPAK classification following functionally aligned RATKA with those who did not. Clinical outcomes were assed at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Collected data included demographics variables, pain (VAS), range of motion (ROM), KOOS scores and radiographic parameters (HKA, MPTA, LDFA). JLO and aHKA values were calculated to determine CPAK classification.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty-five patients were included. The preoperative CPAK phenotype was preserved in 34.6 % of cases, the aHKA group in 55.6 % and the JLO group in 52.7 %. JLO preservation was significantly more frequent in distal-apex knees (90 %). Preservation of the preoperative CPAK phenotype, aHKA group or JLO group had no significant effect on knee ROM, pain or functional outcomes at 6 or 12 months postoperatively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Changes in CPAK classification, aHKA or JLO during RATKA with functional alignment do not impact clinical outcomes at 6 or 12 months. Implant positioning should aim for a stable, well-balanced knee within safe positioning boundaries, rather than exact CPAK restoration.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>III.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics","volume":"66 ","pages":"Pages 282-286"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X25002545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To determine if maintaining the preoperative CPAK class influences on clinical outcomes when performing a functional aligned robotic assisted TKA (RATKA).
Methods
This prospective cohort study compared patients who maintained their preoperative CPAK classification following functionally aligned RATKA with those who did not. Clinical outcomes were assed at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Collected data included demographics variables, pain (VAS), range of motion (ROM), KOOS scores and radiographic parameters (HKA, MPTA, LDFA). JLO and aHKA values were calculated to determine CPAK classification.
Results
Fifty-five patients were included. The preoperative CPAK phenotype was preserved in 34.6 % of cases, the aHKA group in 55.6 % and the JLO group in 52.7 %. JLO preservation was significantly more frequent in distal-apex knees (90 %). Preservation of the preoperative CPAK phenotype, aHKA group or JLO group had no significant effect on knee ROM, pain or functional outcomes at 6 or 12 months postoperatively.
Conclusions
Changes in CPAK classification, aHKA or JLO during RATKA with functional alignment do not impact clinical outcomes at 6 or 12 months. Implant positioning should aim for a stable, well-balanced knee within safe positioning boundaries, rather than exact CPAK restoration.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedics aims to be a leading journal in orthopaedics and contribute towards the improvement of quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research work and review articles related to different aspects of orthopaedics including Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, Trauma, Spine and Spinal deformities, Pediatric orthopaedics, limb reconstruction procedures, hand surgery, and orthopaedic oncology. It also publishes articles on continuing education, health-related information, case reports and letters to the editor. It is requested to note that the journal has an international readership and all submissions should be aimed at specifying something about the setting in which the work was conducted. Authors must also provide any specific reasons for the research and also provide an elaborate description of the results.