Efficacy and Safety of Prothrombin complex Concentrate in Patients with Massive Intraoperative Bleeding During non-Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2
Bo Tang, Yuelun Zhang, Jia Gan, Lulu Ma, Yuguang Huang
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Prothrombin complex Concentrate in Patients with Massive Intraoperative Bleeding During non-Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Bo Tang, Yuelun Zhang, Jia Gan, Lulu Ma, Yuguang Huang","doi":"10.1177/10760296251356202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeThe efficacy and safety of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) in managing bleeding during non-cardiac surgery are unclear. We investigated the associations of 4F-PCC with postoperative RBC transfusion and adverse events in non-cardiac surgery patients with massive intraoperative bleeding.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study consecutively included non-cardiac surgery patients with massive intraoperative bleeding at a tertiary hospital (2014-2020). Administration of 4F-PCC was categorized into dose groups based on quartiles: 0 (reference), 2.8-6.7, 6.7-11.5, 11.5-19.4, and 19.4-87.5 IU/kg. Outcomes included postoperative RBC transfusion, major thromboembolic events, severe acute kidney injury, and lengths of ICU and hospital stay.ResultsOf 137 patients, 89 (65.0%) received 4F-PCC. The 6.7-11.5 IU/kg group were significantly associated with reduced postoperative RBC transfusion compared to the non-4F-PCC group (adjusted mean difference, -1.29 units; 95%CI, -2.55 to -0.04 units, <i>P</i> = 0.044). Such findings were not observed in other dose groups. Notably, the benefits were particularly significant in patients with preoperative platelet count ≥150 × 109/l (<i>P</i> = 0.031), and fibrinogen ≥3 g/l (<i>P</i> = 0.025). The 6.7-11.5 IU/kg group exhibited comparable incidences of major thromboembolic events (13.0% vs 10.4%) and severe acute kidney injury (8.7% vs 8.3%) compared to the non-4F-PCC group. The lengths of ICU and hospital stay were similar across groups.Conclusion4F-PCC may be associated with decreased postoperative RBC transfusion in non-cardiac surgery patients experiencing massive intraoperative bleeding, without a significant increase in the risk of major thromboembolic events. Randomized trials with stratified dosing are warranted to confirm efficacy, safety, and determine optimal doses.Clinical Trial NumberChiCTR2500096573.</p>","PeriodicalId":520590,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis","volume":"31 ","pages":"10760296251356202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12227943/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296251356202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe efficacy and safety of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) in managing bleeding during non-cardiac surgery are unclear. We investigated the associations of 4F-PCC with postoperative RBC transfusion and adverse events in non-cardiac surgery patients with massive intraoperative bleeding.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study consecutively included non-cardiac surgery patients with massive intraoperative bleeding at a tertiary hospital (2014-2020). Administration of 4F-PCC was categorized into dose groups based on quartiles: 0 (reference), 2.8-6.7, 6.7-11.5, 11.5-19.4, and 19.4-87.5 IU/kg. Outcomes included postoperative RBC transfusion, major thromboembolic events, severe acute kidney injury, and lengths of ICU and hospital stay.ResultsOf 137 patients, 89 (65.0%) received 4F-PCC. The 6.7-11.5 IU/kg group were significantly associated with reduced postoperative RBC transfusion compared to the non-4F-PCC group (adjusted mean difference, -1.29 units; 95%CI, -2.55 to -0.04 units, P = 0.044). Such findings were not observed in other dose groups. Notably, the benefits were particularly significant in patients with preoperative platelet count ≥150 × 109/l (P = 0.031), and fibrinogen ≥3 g/l (P = 0.025). The 6.7-11.5 IU/kg group exhibited comparable incidences of major thromboembolic events (13.0% vs 10.4%) and severe acute kidney injury (8.7% vs 8.3%) compared to the non-4F-PCC group. The lengths of ICU and hospital stay were similar across groups.Conclusion4F-PCC may be associated with decreased postoperative RBC transfusion in non-cardiac surgery patients experiencing massive intraoperative bleeding, without a significant increase in the risk of major thromboembolic events. Randomized trials with stratified dosing are warranted to confirm efficacy, safety, and determine optimal doses.Clinical Trial NumberChiCTR2500096573.

凝血酶原复合物浓缩液在非心脏手术中大量出血患者中的疗效和安全性:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的四因子凝血酶原复合物浓缩物(4F-PCC)治疗非心脏手术出血的有效性和安全性尚不清楚。我们研究了4F-PCC与非心脏手术患者术中大量出血的术后红细胞输血和不良事件的关系。方法回顾性队列研究纳入2014-2020年某三级医院非心脏手术术中大出血患者。4F-PCC给药按四分位数分为0(参考)、2.8-6.7、6.7-11.5、11.5-19.4和19.4-87.5 IU/kg剂量组。结果包括术后红细胞输血、主要血栓栓塞事件、严重急性肾损伤、ICU和住院时间。结果137例患者中,89例(65.0%)接受4F-PCC治疗。与非4f - pcc组相比,6.7-11.5 IU/kg组与术后红细胞输血减少显著相关(调整后平均差为-1.29单位;95%CI, -2.55 ~ -0.04单位,P = 0.044)。在其他剂量组中未观察到这些结果。值得注意的是,术前血小板计数≥150 × 109/l (P = 0.031)和纤维蛋白原≥3g /l (P = 0.025)的患者获益尤为显著。与非4f - pcc组相比,6.7-11.5 IU/kg组的主要血栓栓塞事件发生率(13.0% vs 10.4%)和严重急性肾损伤发生率(8.7% vs 8.3%)相当。ICU和住院时间各组相似。结论4f - pcc可能与术中大量出血的非心脏手术患者术后红细胞输血减少有关,但未显著增加重大血栓栓塞事件的风险。有必要进行分层给药的随机试验,以确认疗效、安全性并确定最佳剂量。临床试验编号chictr2500096573。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信