Radiological and Biological Dictionary of Radiomics Features: Addressing Understandable AI Issues in Personalized Prostate Cancer, Dictionary Version PM1.0.

Mohammad R Salmanpour, Sajad Amiri, Sara Gharibi, Ahmad Shariftabrizi, Yixi Xu, William B Weeks, Arman Rahmim, Ilker Hacihaliloglu
{"title":"Radiological and Biological Dictionary of Radiomics Features: Addressing Understandable AI Issues in Personalized Prostate Cancer, Dictionary Version PM1.0.","authors":"Mohammad R Salmanpour, Sajad Amiri, Sara Gharibi, Ahmad Shariftabrizi, Yixi Xu, William B Weeks, Arman Rahmim, Ilker Hacihaliloglu","doi":"10.1007/s10278-025-01585-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) can advance medical diagnostics, but interpretability limits its clinical use. This work links standardized quantitative Radiomics features (RF) extracted from medical images with clinical frameworks like PI-RADS, ensuring AI models are understandable and aligned with clinical practice. We investigate the connection between visual semantic features defined in PI-RADS and associated risk factors, moving beyond abnormal imaging findings, and establishing a shared framework between medical and AI professionals by creating a standardized radiological/biological RF dictionary. Six interpretable and seven complex classifiers, combined with nine interpretable feature selection algorithms (FSA), were applied to RFs extracted from segmented lesions in T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) multiparametric MRI sequences to predict TCIA-UCLA scores, grouped as low-risk (scores 1-3) and high-risk (scores 4-5). We then utilized the created dictionary to interpret the best predictive models. Combining sequences with FSAs including ANOVA F-test, Correlation Coefficient, and Fisher Score, and utilizing logistic regression, identified key features: The 90th percentile from T2WI, (reflecting hypo-intensity related to prostate cancer risk; Variance from T2WI (lesion heterogeneity; shape metrics including Least Axis Length and Surface Area to Volume ratio from ADC, describing lesion shape and compactness; and Run Entropy from ADC (texture consistency). This approach achieved the highest average accuracy of 0.78 ± 0.01, significantly outperforming single-sequence methods (p-value < 0.05). The developed dictionary for Prostate-MRI (PM1.0) serves as a common language and fosters collaboration between clinical professionals and AI developers to advance trustworthy AI solutions that support reliable/interpretable clinical decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":516858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-025-01585-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) can advance medical diagnostics, but interpretability limits its clinical use. This work links standardized quantitative Radiomics features (RF) extracted from medical images with clinical frameworks like PI-RADS, ensuring AI models are understandable and aligned with clinical practice. We investigate the connection between visual semantic features defined in PI-RADS and associated risk factors, moving beyond abnormal imaging findings, and establishing a shared framework between medical and AI professionals by creating a standardized radiological/biological RF dictionary. Six interpretable and seven complex classifiers, combined with nine interpretable feature selection algorithms (FSA), were applied to RFs extracted from segmented lesions in T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) multiparametric MRI sequences to predict TCIA-UCLA scores, grouped as low-risk (scores 1-3) and high-risk (scores 4-5). We then utilized the created dictionary to interpret the best predictive models. Combining sequences with FSAs including ANOVA F-test, Correlation Coefficient, and Fisher Score, and utilizing logistic regression, identified key features: The 90th percentile from T2WI, (reflecting hypo-intensity related to prostate cancer risk; Variance from T2WI (lesion heterogeneity; shape metrics including Least Axis Length and Surface Area to Volume ratio from ADC, describing lesion shape and compactness; and Run Entropy from ADC (texture consistency). This approach achieved the highest average accuracy of 0.78 ± 0.01, significantly outperforming single-sequence methods (p-value < 0.05). The developed dictionary for Prostate-MRI (PM1.0) serves as a common language and fosters collaboration between clinical professionals and AI developers to advance trustworthy AI solutions that support reliable/interpretable clinical decisions.

放射组学特征的放射学和生物学词典:解决个性化前列腺癌中可理解的人工智能问题,词典版PM1.0。
人工智能(AI)可以促进医学诊断,但可解释性限制了其临床应用。这项工作将从医学图像中提取的标准化定量放射组学特征(RF)与PI-RADS等临床框架联系起来,确保人工智能模型易于理解并与临床实践保持一致。我们研究了PI-RADS中定义的视觉语义特征与相关风险因素之间的联系,超越了异常成像发现,并通过创建标准化的放射/生物射频词典,在医学和人工智能专业人员之间建立了共享框架。6个可解释分类器和7个复杂分类器,结合9个可解释特征选择算法(FSA),对t2加权成像(T2WI)、弥散加权成像(DWI)和表观扩散系数(ADC)多参数MRI序列中从分段病变中提取的RFs进行预测TCIA-UCLA评分,分为低危(1-3分)和高危(4-5分)。然后,我们利用创建的字典来解释最佳预测模型。结合序列与fsa,包括方差分析f检验、相关系数和Fisher评分,并利用logistic回归,确定了关键特征:T2WI的第90百分位数(反映低强度与前列腺癌风险相关);T2WI差异(病变异质性;形状指标包括ADC的最小轴长和表面积体积比,描述病变的形状和紧密度;和运行熵从ADC(纹理一致性)。该方法的平均精度为0.78±0.01,显著优于单序列方法(p-value
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信