Understanding the value of paracervical block during gynecologic brachytherapy: A systematic review of the literature.

IF 1.8
Stephanie Gulstene, Razan Amjad, Lucas C Mendez
{"title":"Understanding the value of paracervical block during gynecologic brachytherapy: A systematic review of the literature.","authors":"Stephanie Gulstene, Razan Amjad, Lucas C Mendez","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Paracervical block is a technique to provide local anesthesia with evidence supporting its use for various gynecologic procedures; however, the literature on its use for gynecologic brachytherapy is limited. This systematic review seeks to understand the efficacy and safety of paracervical block in cervical cancer brachytherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed and EMBASE/Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to June 2023. Articles were included if they described or mentioned the use of paracervical block in the context of HDR brachytherapy for cervix cancer. Non-English language or abstract-only articles were excluded. Citations were reviewed for relevant papers. Pain control and toxicity outcomes were abstracted along with technical details of anesthesia and brachytherapy procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 396 articles identified, eight were included. Two gave general recommendations around the role of paracervical block. The rest described its use during brachytherapy at their respective institutions. There was heterogeneity in paracervical block technique across different publications. The majority of included articles describe use of paracervical block for procedural pain control, while only one describe its use for postprocedure pain control. Pain was well controlled with <10% of patients experiencing moderate or higher pain. However, there were no studies specifically assessing pain management with versus without use of paracervical block. The rate of grade 3+ toxicity associated with its use was <5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Paracervical block is safe and can be part of effective pain management for patients receiving cervical brachytherapy. However, the incremental benefit of adding paracervical block is not well assessed in the current literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2025.04.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Paracervical block is a technique to provide local anesthesia with evidence supporting its use for various gynecologic procedures; however, the literature on its use for gynecologic brachytherapy is limited. This systematic review seeks to understand the efficacy and safety of paracervical block in cervical cancer brachytherapy.

Methods: PubMed and EMBASE/Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to June 2023. Articles were included if they described or mentioned the use of paracervical block in the context of HDR brachytherapy for cervix cancer. Non-English language or abstract-only articles were excluded. Citations were reviewed for relevant papers. Pain control and toxicity outcomes were abstracted along with technical details of anesthesia and brachytherapy procedure.

Results: Of the 396 articles identified, eight were included. Two gave general recommendations around the role of paracervical block. The rest described its use during brachytherapy at their respective institutions. There was heterogeneity in paracervical block technique across different publications. The majority of included articles describe use of paracervical block for procedural pain control, while only one describe its use for postprocedure pain control. Pain was well controlled with <10% of patients experiencing moderate or higher pain. However, there were no studies specifically assessing pain management with versus without use of paracervical block. The rate of grade 3+ toxicity associated with its use was <5%.

Conclusions: Paracervical block is safe and can be part of effective pain management for patients receiving cervical brachytherapy. However, the incremental benefit of adding paracervical block is not well assessed in the current literature.

了解宫颈旁阻滞在妇科近距离放射治疗中的价值:系统的文献回顾。
背景:宫颈旁阻滞是一种提供局部麻醉的技术,有证据支持其用于各种妇科手术;然而,关于其用于妇科近距离治疗的文献是有限的。本系统综述旨在了解宫颈旁阻滞在宫颈癌近距离放疗中的有效性和安全性。方法:检索PubMed和EMBASE/Cochrane Library数据库,检索时间为建库至2023年6月。描述或提及宫颈旁阻滞在宫颈癌HDR近距离放疗中的应用的文章均被纳入。非英语或纯摘要文章被排除在外。查阅相关论文的引文。疼痛控制和毒性结果与麻醉和近距离治疗程序的技术细节一起被抽象。结果:在鉴定的396篇文献中,有8篇被纳入。两位医生就宫颈旁阻滞的作用给出了一般性建议。其余的描述了其在各自机构的近距离治疗中的使用。在不同的出版物中,宫颈旁阻滞技术存在异质性。纳入的大多数文章描述了颈椎旁阻滞用于手术性疼痛控制,而只有一篇文章描述了其用于手术后疼痛控制。结论:宫颈旁阻滞是安全的,可以作为近距离治疗患者疼痛管理的一部分。然而,在目前的文献中,增加宫颈旁阻滞的增量效益并没有得到很好的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信