Comparison of fast and standard segmented techniques for detection of late gadolinium enhancement in acute myocardial infarction: a prospective clinical cardiovascular magnetic resonance trial.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2025-06-06 Epub Date: 2025-06-03 DOI:10.21037/qims-24-2308
Jinshui Li, Huihui Kong, Zhaozhao Wang, Ying Yuan, Jing An, Yi He
{"title":"Comparison of fast and standard segmented techniques for detection of late gadolinium enhancement in acute myocardial infarction: a prospective clinical cardiovascular magnetic resonance trial.","authors":"Jinshui Li, Huihui Kong, Zhaozhao Wang, Ying Yuan, Jing An, Yi He","doi":"10.21037/qims-24-2308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Segmented phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) turbo fast low-angle shot (FLASH) has become the reference standard sequence for late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. However, it has a long scanning time, requires multiple breath holds, and is prone to motion artifacts. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of two fast LGE sequences with FLASH PSIR in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) detection and quantification of LGE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively recruited consecutive AMI patients who underwent clinical contrast-enhanced CMR with three different LGE sequences at Beijing Friendship Hospital. The overall image quality (IQ) score and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were used to comprehensively evaluate IQ. LGE and microvascular obstruction (MVO) were qualitatively and quantitatively assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 110 AMI patients (90 males, 58.61±10.9 years) were included in our analyses. Of these, 100 patients (84 males, 58.6±10.9 years) presented LGE (+), and 60 patients developed MVO. Participants were divided into three groups according to the LGE results, namely LGE (-), LGE (+) without MVO, and LGE (+) with MVO. The overall IQ score and CNR for the two fast sequences [single-shot true fast imaging with steady-state precession (TrueFISP PSIR), PSIR motion-corrected, free-breathing single-shot balanced steady-state free precession (moco bSSFP)] were significantly higher than those for the FLASH PSIR (P<0.001). On visual assessment, the number of layers (P=0.20 and 0.22, respectively) and segments (P=0.09 and 0.32, respectively) for LGE displayed no difference and showed excellent matching with those of FLASH PSIR. There were no significant differences in LGE mass (P=0.61 and 0.83, respectively) and MVO mass (P=0.15 and 0.55, respectively) between the FLASH PSIR and the two fast sequences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In clinical practice, these two rapid sequences can achieve good IQ, as well as accurate localization and quantification of LGE when acquired during a single breath hold or in a free-breathing state. We recommend them as the preferred LGE CMR sequence for AMI patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54267,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","volume":"15 6","pages":"5769-5780"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12209636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-2308","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Segmented phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) turbo fast low-angle shot (FLASH) has become the reference standard sequence for late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. However, it has a long scanning time, requires multiple breath holds, and is prone to motion artifacts. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of two fast LGE sequences with FLASH PSIR in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) detection and quantification of LGE.

Methods: We prospectively recruited consecutive AMI patients who underwent clinical contrast-enhanced CMR with three different LGE sequences at Beijing Friendship Hospital. The overall image quality (IQ) score and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were used to comprehensively evaluate IQ. LGE and microvascular obstruction (MVO) were qualitatively and quantitatively assessed.

Results: A total of 110 AMI patients (90 males, 58.61±10.9 years) were included in our analyses. Of these, 100 patients (84 males, 58.6±10.9 years) presented LGE (+), and 60 patients developed MVO. Participants were divided into three groups according to the LGE results, namely LGE (-), LGE (+) without MVO, and LGE (+) with MVO. The overall IQ score and CNR for the two fast sequences [single-shot true fast imaging with steady-state precession (TrueFISP PSIR), PSIR motion-corrected, free-breathing single-shot balanced steady-state free precession (moco bSSFP)] were significantly higher than those for the FLASH PSIR (P<0.001). On visual assessment, the number of layers (P=0.20 and 0.22, respectively) and segments (P=0.09 and 0.32, respectively) for LGE displayed no difference and showed excellent matching with those of FLASH PSIR. There were no significant differences in LGE mass (P=0.61 and 0.83, respectively) and MVO mass (P=0.15 and 0.55, respectively) between the FLASH PSIR and the two fast sequences.

Conclusions: In clinical practice, these two rapid sequences can achieve good IQ, as well as accurate localization and quantification of LGE when acquired during a single breath hold or in a free-breathing state. We recommend them as the preferred LGE CMR sequence for AMI patients.

快速和标准分割技术检测急性心肌梗死晚期钆增强的比较:一项前瞻性临床心血管磁共振试验。
背景:分段相位敏感反转恢复(PSIR)涡轮快速低角度拍摄(FLASH)已成为晚期钆增强(LGE)心脏磁共振(CMR)成像的参考标准序列。然而,它有很长的扫描时间,需要多次屏气,并且容易产生运动伪影。本研究旨在比较两种快速LGE序列与FLASH PSIR在急性心肌梗死(AMI) LGE检测和定量中的准确性。方法:我们前瞻性地招募在北京友谊医院接受三种不同LGE序列临床对比增强CMR的AMI患者。采用整体图像质量(IQ)评分和噪声对比比(CNR)对IQ进行综合评价。定性和定量评价LGE和微血管阻塞(MVO)。结果:共纳入AMI患者110例(男性90例,58.61±10.9岁)。其中100例(男性84例,58.6±10.9岁)出现LGE(+), 60例发生MVO。根据LGE结果将参与者分为三组,即LGE(-)组、LGE(+)组和LGE(+)组。两组快速序列[单镜头真快速成像与稳态进动(TrueFISP PSIR),运动校正后的PSIR,自由呼吸单镜头平衡稳态自由进动(moco bSSFP)]的总体IQ得分和CNR显著高于FLASH PSIR (pfp)。在临床实践中,这两种快速序列在单次屏气或自由呼吸状态下获得时,可以获得较好的IQ,并准确定位和定量LGE。我们推荐它们作为AMI患者首选的LGE CMR序列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信