Association Among Psychological Capital, Relationship Satisfaction and Psychological Distress in Stroke Patient-Spouse Dyads: An Actor-Partner Interdependence Mediation Model.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Qianqian Sun, Shanshan Wang, Wangtao Song, Song Ge, Xin Li, Ling Ma, Zhenxiang Zhang, Yongxia Mei
{"title":"Association Among Psychological Capital, Relationship Satisfaction and Psychological Distress in Stroke Patient-Spouse Dyads: An Actor-Partner Interdependence Mediation Model.","authors":"Qianqian Sun, Shanshan Wang, Wangtao Song, Song Ge, Xin Li, Ling Ma, Zhenxiang Zhang, Yongxia Mei","doi":"10.1111/jnu.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the association between psychological capital and psychological distress in stroke patient-spouse dyads and examine the mediating effect of relationship satisfaction in this association.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population of 207 stroke patient-spouse dyads completed the Positive Psychological Capital Questionnaire, Quality of Relationship Index, and Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. A dyadic analysis was conducted using the actor-partner interdependence mediation model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In stroke-affected couples, a noteworthy interaction exists between moderately elevated levels of psychological capital (p < 0.01). Patients exhibit significantly diminished psychological capital and heightened psychological distress compared to their spouses (t = -5.429, p < 0.001; t = 2.536, p < 0.05). Conversely, there is no significant variance in relationship satisfaction between patients and the partners (t = -0.920, p > 0.05). Patient relationship satisfaction acts as a mediator in the correlation between dyadic psychological capital and patient psychological distress (β = -0.020, p < 0.05; β = -0.011, p < 0.05). Similarly, spousal relationship satisfaction serves as a mediator in the connection between dyadic psychological capital and spousal psychological distress (β = -0.011, p < 0.05; β = -0.020, p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical relevance: </strong>Psychological distress was reduced when psychological capital or relationship satisfaction in stroke dyads was promoted, and relationship satisfaction is an important mediator of the impact of psychological capital on psychological distress in the dyads. Healthcare providers should pay equal attention to spouses and implement dyadic psychological capital interventions centered on stroke couples to enhance relationship satisfaction and reduce psychological distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":51091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.70023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the association between psychological capital and psychological distress in stroke patient-spouse dyads and examine the mediating effect of relationship satisfaction in this association.

Methods: A population of 207 stroke patient-spouse dyads completed the Positive Psychological Capital Questionnaire, Quality of Relationship Index, and Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. A dyadic analysis was conducted using the actor-partner interdependence mediation model.

Results: In stroke-affected couples, a noteworthy interaction exists between moderately elevated levels of psychological capital (p < 0.01). Patients exhibit significantly diminished psychological capital and heightened psychological distress compared to their spouses (t = -5.429, p < 0.001; t = 2.536, p < 0.05). Conversely, there is no significant variance in relationship satisfaction between patients and the partners (t = -0.920, p > 0.05). Patient relationship satisfaction acts as a mediator in the correlation between dyadic psychological capital and patient psychological distress (β = -0.020, p < 0.05; β = -0.011, p < 0.05). Similarly, spousal relationship satisfaction serves as a mediator in the connection between dyadic psychological capital and spousal psychological distress (β = -0.011, p < 0.05; β = -0.020, p < 0.05).

Conclusions and clinical relevance: Psychological distress was reduced when psychological capital or relationship satisfaction in stroke dyads was promoted, and relationship satisfaction is an important mediator of the impact of psychological capital on psychological distress in the dyads. Healthcare providers should pay equal attention to spouses and implement dyadic psychological capital interventions centered on stroke couples to enhance relationship satisfaction and reduce psychological distress.

脑卒中患者-配偶二联体心理资本、关系满意度和心理困扰的关系:一个行动者-伴侣相互依赖的中介模型。
目的:探讨脑卒中患者-配偶对心理资本与心理困扰的关系,并考察关系满意度在这种关系中的中介作用。方法:对207例脑卒中患者配偶完成积极心理资本问卷、关系质量指数和Kessler心理困扰量表。使用参与者-伙伴相互依赖中介模型进行了二元分析。结果:在卒中夫妇中,适度升高的心理资本水平之间存在显著的交互作用(p < 0.05)。患者关系满意度在脑卒中双联体心理资本与患者心理困扰的相关关系中起中介作用(β = -0.020, p)。结论与临床相关性:心理资本或关系满意度的提升会降低脑卒中双联体患者的心理困扰,关系满意度是心理资本对脑卒中双联体患者心理困扰影响的重要中介。医疗服务提供者应给予配偶同等的关注,并实施以中风夫妇为中心的二元心理资本干预,以提高关系满意度,减少心理困扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This widely read and respected journal features peer-reviewed, thought-provoking articles representing research by some of the world’s leading nurse researchers. Reaching health professionals, faculty and students in 103 countries, the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is focused on health of people throughout the world. It is the official journal of Sigma Theta Tau International and it reflects the society’s dedication to providing the tools necessary to improve nursing care around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信