Sriharsha Gummadi, Amr Mohammed, Mostafa Alnoury, Fari Fall, Tania Siu Xiao, Kaizer Contreras, Adam Maxwell, Eli Vlaisavljevich, Ji-Bin Liu, Corinne E Wessner, Flemming Forsberg, Allison Goldberg, George Koenig, John R Eisenbrey
{"title":"Contrast-Enhanced B-Flow Ultrasound: A Novel Approach to Liver Trauma Imaging.","authors":"Sriharsha Gummadi, Amr Mohammed, Mostafa Alnoury, Fari Fall, Tania Siu Xiao, Kaizer Contreras, Adam Maxwell, Eli Vlaisavljevich, Ji-Bin Liu, Corinne E Wessner, Flemming Forsberg, Allison Goldberg, George Koenig, John R Eisenbrey","doi":"10.1177/01617346251346922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) shows promise in solid organ trauma by identifying areas of disrupted perfusion. In contrast, B-Flow ultrasound offers high fidelity imaging of larger vessels. We hypothesize that contrast-enhanced B-Flow (CEB-Flow) will improve accuracy of hepatic vessel injury delineation, as an adjunct tool to CEUS and future ultrasound-guided therapies. Imaging data was collected using our IACUC approved swine model for traumatic liver injury. All procedures were approved within this IACUC protocol. Sonography was performed using a Logiq E10 scanner with C1-6 probe (GE HealthCare). After ultrasound guided liver trauma, we performed open-abdomen B-Mode ultrasound, CEUS, and CEB-Flow of the injury during infusion of Definity (Lantheus Medical Imaging, N. Billerica, MA). CEUS was performed using coded harmonic imaging and CEB-Flow using a commercial package (GE Healthcare). Twelve swine were used for analysis. Three blinded interpreters were asked to identify injured liver parenchyma and lacerated vessels. Identification rates were compared using ultrasound-guided laceration images and pathology confirmation as a reference standard. Liver injury identification ranged from 88.3% to 100% on CEUS and 50% to 66.7% on CEB-Flow. Consensus identification rates in identifying parenchymal injury were not significantly different (91.7% CEUS vs. 66.7% CEB-Flow, <i>p</i> = .25). Lacerated vessel identification ranged from 41.7% to 58.3% for CEUS and 75.0% to 91.7% for CEB-Flow. Specifically, CEB-Flow demonstrated improved consensus in identifying lacerated vasculature (41.7% CEUS vs. 91.7% CEB-Flow, <i>p</i> = .041). In this swine model study, the combination of CEUS and CEB-Flow could accurately identify and localize traumatic hepatic injury. CEB-Flow may better characterize vessel injury, which in turn may direct and improve bedside management.</p>","PeriodicalId":49401,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasonic Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"1617346251346922"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasonic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01617346251346922","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) shows promise in solid organ trauma by identifying areas of disrupted perfusion. In contrast, B-Flow ultrasound offers high fidelity imaging of larger vessels. We hypothesize that contrast-enhanced B-Flow (CEB-Flow) will improve accuracy of hepatic vessel injury delineation, as an adjunct tool to CEUS and future ultrasound-guided therapies. Imaging data was collected using our IACUC approved swine model for traumatic liver injury. All procedures were approved within this IACUC protocol. Sonography was performed using a Logiq E10 scanner with C1-6 probe (GE HealthCare). After ultrasound guided liver trauma, we performed open-abdomen B-Mode ultrasound, CEUS, and CEB-Flow of the injury during infusion of Definity (Lantheus Medical Imaging, N. Billerica, MA). CEUS was performed using coded harmonic imaging and CEB-Flow using a commercial package (GE Healthcare). Twelve swine were used for analysis. Three blinded interpreters were asked to identify injured liver parenchyma and lacerated vessels. Identification rates were compared using ultrasound-guided laceration images and pathology confirmation as a reference standard. Liver injury identification ranged from 88.3% to 100% on CEUS and 50% to 66.7% on CEB-Flow. Consensus identification rates in identifying parenchymal injury were not significantly different (91.7% CEUS vs. 66.7% CEB-Flow, p = .25). Lacerated vessel identification ranged from 41.7% to 58.3% for CEUS and 75.0% to 91.7% for CEB-Flow. Specifically, CEB-Flow demonstrated improved consensus in identifying lacerated vasculature (41.7% CEUS vs. 91.7% CEB-Flow, p = .041). In this swine model study, the combination of CEUS and CEB-Flow could accurately identify and localize traumatic hepatic injury. CEB-Flow may better characterize vessel injury, which in turn may direct and improve bedside management.
对比增强超声(CEUS)通过识别灌注中断的区域在实体器官创伤中显示出希望。相比之下,b流超声提供了大血管的高保真成像。我们假设对比增强B-Flow (CEB-Flow)将提高肝血管损伤描绘的准确性,作为超声造影和未来超声引导治疗的辅助工具。影像学数据是用IACUC批准的猪外伤性肝损伤模型收集的。所有程序都在IACUC协议范围内获得批准。使用Logiq E10扫描仪和C1-6探头(GE HealthCare)进行超声检查。超声引导肝损伤后,我们在输注Definity (Lantheus Medical Imaging, N. Billerica, MA)期间对损伤行开腹b超、超声造影和CEB-Flow检查。CEUS使用编码谐波成像和CEB-Flow进行,使用商业软件包(GE Healthcare)。12头猪用于分析。三名盲传译员被要求识别损伤的肝实质和撕裂的血管。以超声引导下的裂伤图像和病理证实为参考标准,比较其检出率。肝损伤诊断率在CEUS上为88.3%至100%,在CEB-Flow上为50%至66.7%。确认实质损伤的共识识别率无显著差异(91.7% CEUS vs 66.7% CEB-Flow, p = 0.25)。CEUS对撕裂血管的识别范围为41.7%至58.3%,CEB-Flow为75.0%至91.7%。具体来说,CEB-Flow在识别血管破裂方面表现出更高的一致性(41.7% CEUS vs. 91.7% CEB-Flow, p = 0.041)。在猪模型研究中,超声造影和CEB-Flow结合可以准确识别和定位外伤性肝损伤。CEB-Flow可以更好地表征血管损伤,从而指导和改善床边管理。
期刊介绍:
Ultrasonic Imaging provides rapid publication for original and exceptional papers concerned with the development and application of ultrasonic-imaging technology. Ultrasonic Imaging publishes articles in the following areas: theoretical and experimental aspects of advanced methods and instrumentation for imaging