The role of early weight bearing in the aftertreatment of unilateral displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures: a systematic review and pooled analysis.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Coen Verstappen, Mitchell L S Driessen, Lloyd Brandts, Michael J R Edwards, Martijn Poeze, Erik Hermans, Pishtiwan H S Kalmet
{"title":"The role of early weight bearing in the aftertreatment of unilateral displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures: a systematic review and pooled analysis.","authors":"Coen Verstappen, Mitchell L S Driessen, Lloyd Brandts, Michael J R Edwards, Martijn Poeze, Erik Hermans, Pishtiwan H S Kalmet","doi":"10.1186/s10195-025-00863-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs) remain a complex challenge in orthopedic practice due to their complexity and the intricate nature of surgical interventions. While surgical techniques have evolved, postoperative rehabilitation is equally crucial for achieving optimal outcomes. This systematic review evaluates the effects of early weight bearing (EWB) in surgically treated patients with unilateral DIACFs on patient-reported outcomes, health-related quality of life, postoperative pain, differences in Böhler's angle, and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was performed across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to January 2025. Eligible studied included adults (≥ 18 years) who underwent surgery for unilateral DIACFs (Sanders type II-IV), implemented an EWB protocol, reported at least one patient-reported outcome, and were published from 2000 onward. Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1007 identified records, 20 studies (n = 1051 DIACFs) met the inclusion criteria. Pooled results showed a mean American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Score of 85.7, Maryland Foot Score of 91.1, and visual analog score of 1.9. The analysis revealed a decline of 0.4 degrees in Böhler's angle from postoperative to last follow-up. The overall complication rate was 13.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EWB protocols appear to be safe and beneficial in the postoperative management of DIACFs, yielding favorable outcomes without increased complication rates. These findings support the reconsideration of current conservative weight-bearing guidelines. Future research should focus on the development of standardized, evidence-based after-treatment guidelines. Level of evidence Level I. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42022280985.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"26 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12229482/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-025-00863-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs) remain a complex challenge in orthopedic practice due to their complexity and the intricate nature of surgical interventions. While surgical techniques have evolved, postoperative rehabilitation is equally crucial for achieving optimal outcomes. This systematic review evaluates the effects of early weight bearing (EWB) in surgically treated patients with unilateral DIACFs on patient-reported outcomes, health-related quality of life, postoperative pain, differences in Böhler's angle, and complication rates.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to January 2025. Eligible studied included adults (≥ 18 years) who underwent surgery for unilateral DIACFs (Sanders type II-IV), implemented an EWB protocol, reported at least one patient-reported outcome, and were published from 2000 onward. Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Results: From 1007 identified records, 20 studies (n = 1051 DIACFs) met the inclusion criteria. Pooled results showed a mean American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Score of 85.7, Maryland Foot Score of 91.1, and visual analog score of 1.9. The analysis revealed a decline of 0.4 degrees in Böhler's angle from postoperative to last follow-up. The overall complication rate was 13.9%.

Conclusions: EWB protocols appear to be safe and beneficial in the postoperative management of DIACFs, yielding favorable outcomes without increased complication rates. These findings support the reconsideration of current conservative weight-bearing guidelines. Future research should focus on the development of standardized, evidence-based after-treatment guidelines. Level of evidence Level I. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42022280985.

早期负重在单侧移位跟骨关节内骨折后处理中的作用:一项系统回顾和汇总分析。
背景:移位性跟骨关节内骨折(DIACFs)由于其复杂性和手术干预的复杂性,在骨科实践中仍然是一个复杂的挑战。虽然手术技术不断发展,但术后康复对于获得最佳结果同样至关重要。本系统综述评估了手术治疗的单侧DIACFs患者早期负重(EWB)对患者报告的结局、健康相关生活质量、术后疼痛、Böhler角度差异和并发症发生率的影响。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆截至2025年1月的文献。符合条件的研究包括接受手术治疗单侧DIACFs (Sanders II-IV型)的成年人(≥18岁),实施EWB方案,报告至少一个患者报告的结果,并从2000年开始发表。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行数据提取和质量评估。结果:1007份纳入记录中,20项研究(n = 1051 DIACFs)符合纳入标准。汇总结果显示,美国骨科足踝学会(AOFAS)平均评分为85.7分,马里兰足部评分为91.1分,视觉模拟评分为1.9分。分析显示,从术后到最后一次随访,Böhler角度下降了0.4度。总并发症发生率为13.9%。结论:EWB方案在DIACFs的术后管理中似乎是安全有益的,在不增加并发症发生率的情况下产生了良好的结果。这些发现支持重新考虑目前保守的体重指南。未来的研究应侧重于制定标准化、循证的治疗后指南。证据等级i级试验注册号PROSPERO CRD42022280985。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, the official open access peer-reviewed journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, publishes original papers reporting basic or clinical research in the field of orthopaedic and traumatologic surgery, as well as systematic reviews, brief communications, case reports and letters to the Editor. Narrative instructional reviews and commentaries to original articles may be commissioned by Editors from eminent colleagues. The Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology aims to be an international forum for the communication and exchange of ideas concerning the various aspects of orthopaedics and musculoskeletal trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信