Diagnostic work-up in periprosthetic joint infections of the knee: can the albumin-to-globulin ratio be a screening tool?

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Domenico De Mauro, Tiziana Ascione, Enrico Festa, Lucrezia Marasco, Filippo Leggieri, Sara Rosito, Matteo Innocenti, Edoardo Di Pace, Giovanni Balato
{"title":"Diagnostic work-up in periprosthetic joint infections of the knee: can the albumin-to-globulin ratio be a screening tool?","authors":"Domenico De Mauro, Tiziana Ascione, Enrico Festa, Lucrezia Marasco, Filippo Leggieri, Sara Rosito, Matteo Innocenti, Edoardo Di Pace, Giovanni Balato","doi":"10.1186/s10195-025-00857-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to assess the most appropriate thresholds for albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) in patients who had a suspected periprosthetic knee infection. Furthermore, the diagnostic accuracy of the proposed threshold was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between January 2020 and April 2022, patients with failed or painful knee arthroplasty who were admitted to a tertiary referral institution undergoing the standardized diagnostic protocol to identify those with a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) were analyzed. The 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria were used to classify patients with PJIs and aseptic joints. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of AGR were calculated to define the test's diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ROC curve showed that the optimal cutoff value of AGR was 1.43. AGR registered a sensitivity of 95% (95% CI 91-197%), a specificity of 63% (95% CI 56-69%), a positive predictive value of 75% (95% CI 69-81%), and a negative predictive value of 91% (95% CI 86-94%). Receiver operator curve analysis demonstrated an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI 0.77-0.88). Although body mass index (BMI), uremia, glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT), international normalized ratio (INR), and alkaline phosphatase showed significant differences between the false positive cases and those cases affected by aseptic failure with AGR higher than 1.43, indicating potential confounding effects (p < 0.05), no parameter was found to be a significant predictor of false positives cases (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For its high sensitivity, AGR showed potential as a screening tool for detecting infections in PJI diagnostics.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"26 1","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222592/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-025-00857-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess the most appropriate thresholds for albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) in patients who had a suspected periprosthetic knee infection. Furthermore, the diagnostic accuracy of the proposed threshold was evaluated.

Materials and methods: Between January 2020 and April 2022, patients with failed or painful knee arthroplasty who were admitted to a tertiary referral institution undergoing the standardized diagnostic protocol to identify those with a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) were analyzed. The 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria were used to classify patients with PJIs and aseptic joints. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of AGR were calculated to define the test's diagnostic accuracy.

Results: The ROC curve showed that the optimal cutoff value of AGR was 1.43. AGR registered a sensitivity of 95% (95% CI 91-197%), a specificity of 63% (95% CI 56-69%), a positive predictive value of 75% (95% CI 69-81%), and a negative predictive value of 91% (95% CI 86-94%). Receiver operator curve analysis demonstrated an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI 0.77-0.88). Although body mass index (BMI), uremia, glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT), international normalized ratio (INR), and alkaline phosphatase showed significant differences between the false positive cases and those cases affected by aseptic failure with AGR higher than 1.43, indicating potential confounding effects (p < 0.05), no parameter was found to be a significant predictor of false positives cases (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: For its high sensitivity, AGR showed potential as a screening tool for detecting infections in PJI diagnostics.

Level of evidence: III.

膝关节假体周围关节感染的诊断检查:白蛋白与球蛋白比值能否成为一种筛查工具?
背景:本研究旨在评估疑似膝关节假体周围感染患者的白蛋白与球蛋白比率(AGR)的最合适阈值。此外,评估了所提出的阈值的诊断准确性。材料和方法:在2020年1月至2022年4月期间,对三级转诊机构接受标准化诊断方案以识别假体周围关节感染(PJI)的膝关节置换术失败或疼痛患者进行分析。采用2018年国际共识会议(ICM)标准对PJIs和无菌关节患者进行分类。计算AGR的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)来确定该试验的诊断准确性。结果:ROC曲线显示最佳AGR截断值为1.43。AGR的敏感性为95% (95% CI 91-197%),特异性为63% (95% CI 56-69%),阳性预测值为75% (95% CI 69-81%),阴性预测值为91% (95% CI 86-94%)。接收算子曲线分析显示AUC为0.85 (95% CI 0.77-0.88)。假阳性患者的体重指数(BMI)、尿毒症、谷草转氨酶(GOT)、国际标准化比值(INR)、碱性磷酸酶(alkaline phosphatase)与无菌失败患者的AGR > 1.43差异有统计学意义,提示存在潜在的混杂效应(p < 0.05)。结论:AGR具有较高的敏感性,有潜力作为PJI诊断中检测感染的筛选工具。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, the official open access peer-reviewed journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, publishes original papers reporting basic or clinical research in the field of orthopaedic and traumatologic surgery, as well as systematic reviews, brief communications, case reports and letters to the Editor. Narrative instructional reviews and commentaries to original articles may be commissioned by Editors from eminent colleagues. The Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology aims to be an international forum for the communication and exchange of ideas concerning the various aspects of orthopaedics and musculoskeletal trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信