Race, ethnicity, and gender discrepancies between allopathic and osteopathic otolaryngology trainees from 2015 to 2023.

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Katrina M Minutello, Savannah L Nicks, Benjamin T Gillette, Md Sakibur Hasan, Carl B Shermetaro
{"title":"Race, ethnicity, and gender discrepancies between allopathic and osteopathic otolaryngology trainees from 2015 to 2023.","authors":"Katrina M Minutello, Savannah L Nicks, Benjamin T Gillette, Md Sakibur Hasan, Carl B Shermetaro","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Existing studies have analyzed gender and race representation among otolaryngology - head and neck surgery (OHNS) applicants and residents in the United States. Further analysis by graduate medical degree type does not currently exist.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to identify and compare gender and racial disparities in osteopathic (Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine [DO]) and allopathic (Doctor of Medicine [MD]) OHNS applicants and residents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis of sex and racial characteristics of DO and MD OHNS applicants and residents from 2015 to 2023 obtained from the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) and Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) data were performed. Differences between the aggregate proportions of applicants and corresponding residents at Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited OHNS programs by graduate medical degree were evaluated utilizing chi-square tests with Yates' continuity correction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of White MD, Asian MD, and White DO residents increased compared to their corresponding applicant pools (ACGME 0.535, ERAS 0.615; Δ + 0.080; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.059-0.101; p<0.001), (ACGME 0.212, ERAS 0.236; Δ + 0.024; 95 % CI, 0.006-0.042; p<0.001), and (American Osteopathic Association [AOA] 0.661, ERAS 0.809; Δ + 0.148; 95 % CI, 0.032-0.159; p<0.01), respectively. Compared to MD residents, there were increased proportions of White (ERAS 0.615, ERAS 0.809; Δ -0.193; 95 % CI, -0.129 to -0.060; p<0.001) and male (ERAS 0.593, ERAS 0.685; Δ -0.092; 95 % CI, -0.080 to -0.013; p=0.01) DO residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that gender and racial discrepancies exist between DO and MD representation in OHNS. Further research is encouraged to examine the explanation for these differences and improve representation of the DO surgeon in otolaryngology.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Existing studies have analyzed gender and race representation among otolaryngology - head and neck surgery (OHNS) applicants and residents in the United States. Further analysis by graduate medical degree type does not currently exist.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to identify and compare gender and racial disparities in osteopathic (Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine [DO]) and allopathic (Doctor of Medicine [MD]) OHNS applicants and residents.

Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of sex and racial characteristics of DO and MD OHNS applicants and residents from 2015 to 2023 obtained from the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) and Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) data were performed. Differences between the aggregate proportions of applicants and corresponding residents at Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited OHNS programs by graduate medical degree were evaluated utilizing chi-square tests with Yates' continuity correction.

Results: The proportion of White MD, Asian MD, and White DO residents increased compared to their corresponding applicant pools (ACGME 0.535, ERAS 0.615; Δ + 0.080; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.059-0.101; p<0.001), (ACGME 0.212, ERAS 0.236; Δ + 0.024; 95 % CI, 0.006-0.042; p<0.001), and (American Osteopathic Association [AOA] 0.661, ERAS 0.809; Δ + 0.148; 95 % CI, 0.032-0.159; p<0.01), respectively. Compared to MD residents, there were increased proportions of White (ERAS 0.615, ERAS 0.809; Δ -0.193; 95 % CI, -0.129 to -0.060; p<0.001) and male (ERAS 0.593, ERAS 0.685; Δ -0.092; 95 % CI, -0.080 to -0.013; p=0.01) DO residents.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that gender and racial discrepancies exist between DO and MD representation in OHNS. Further research is encouraged to examine the explanation for these differences and improve representation of the DO surgeon in otolaryngology.

2015年至2023年对抗疗法和骨疗法耳鼻喉科学员的种族、民族和性别差异
背景:现有研究分析了美国耳鼻喉头颈外科(OHNS)申请人和住院医师的性别和种族代表性。目前还没有对研究生医学学位类型进行进一步分析。目的:本研究的目的是识别和比较骨科(骨科医学博士[DO])和对抗疗法(医学博士[MD]) OHNS申请人和住院医师的性别和种族差异。方法:对2015 - 2023年美国医学院协会(AAMC)和电子住院申请服务(ERAS)数据中DO和MD OHNS申请人和居民的性别和种族特征进行横断面分析。在研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)认可的OHNS项目中,申请人和相应住院医师的总比例之间的差异利用卡方检验和Yates的连续性校正进行评估。结果:白人医学博士、亚裔医学博士和白人DO居民的比例相对于相应的申请人群体有所增加(ACGME 0.535, ERAS 0.615;Δ + 0.080;95 %置信区间[CI], 0.059-0.101;结论:研究结果表明,在OHNS中,DO和MD的表现存在性别和种族差异。我们鼓励进一步的研究来检验这些差异的解释,并提高DO外科医生在耳鼻喉科的代表性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Health Professions-Complementary and Manual Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
118
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信