Factors Influencing Aerosol Delivery During Invasive Ventilation.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Fai A Albuainain, Xiaoyan Man, Omar Alamoudi, Jie Li
{"title":"Factors Influencing Aerosol Delivery During Invasive Ventilation.","authors":"Fai A Albuainain, Xiaoyan Man, Omar Alamoudi, Jie Li","doi":"10.1089/respcare.12942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Several factors influence aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation, such as patient characteristics, device configuration, and ventilator settings. This study aimed to evaluate how ventilator settings, humidification, nebulizer positions, bias flows, and circuit adapters affected aerosol delivery during invasive ventilation. <b>Methods:</b> Using an in vitro model, aerosol delivery of albuterol (2.5 mg/3 mL) via a vibrating mesh nebulizer was tested under 28 conditions during invasive ventilation. A systematic stepwise ruling-out approach was taken over 3 phases: (1) dry circuit, (2) dry circuit with exhaled humidity, and (3) heated and humidified circuit with exhaled humidity. Variables included ventilator settings (high vs low), nebulizer positions (proximal to the endotracheal tube vs distal), bias flows (2 vs 5 L/min), and circuit adapters (Y- vs V-shaped). The variables deemed unimportant were progressively excluded in later phases. Each condition was tested 5 times. Drug deposition was collected on filters, eluted, and quantified using ultraviolet spectrophotometry at 276 nm. <b>Results:</b> High ventilator settings significantly increased inhaled doses compared with lower settings across most conditions (all <i>P</i> < .05), with the greatest absolute increase of inhaled dose was observed in dry circuits without exhaled humidity (11-22%). This effect was reduced to 4-7% with the use of exhaled humidity in both dry and heated humidified circuits. Proximal nebulizer placement yielded higher doses than distal placement under high settings in dry circuits without exhaled humidity, but this difference was diminished or absent when exhaled humidity or heated humidification were introduced. Bias flow and adapter type had minimal impact on inhaled dose, except in specific conditions under dry circuit without exhaled humidity. <b>Conclusions:</b> In dry circuits without exhaled humidity, aerosol delivery was substantially affected by ventilator settings and nebulizer placement, whereas bias flow and circuit adapter types had no notable impact. However, the effects of ventilator settings and nebulizer placement diminished in circuits with exhaled humidity or heated humidification.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.12942","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several factors influence aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation, such as patient characteristics, device configuration, and ventilator settings. This study aimed to evaluate how ventilator settings, humidification, nebulizer positions, bias flows, and circuit adapters affected aerosol delivery during invasive ventilation. Methods: Using an in vitro model, aerosol delivery of albuterol (2.5 mg/3 mL) via a vibrating mesh nebulizer was tested under 28 conditions during invasive ventilation. A systematic stepwise ruling-out approach was taken over 3 phases: (1) dry circuit, (2) dry circuit with exhaled humidity, and (3) heated and humidified circuit with exhaled humidity. Variables included ventilator settings (high vs low), nebulizer positions (proximal to the endotracheal tube vs distal), bias flows (2 vs 5 L/min), and circuit adapters (Y- vs V-shaped). The variables deemed unimportant were progressively excluded in later phases. Each condition was tested 5 times. Drug deposition was collected on filters, eluted, and quantified using ultraviolet spectrophotometry at 276 nm. Results: High ventilator settings significantly increased inhaled doses compared with lower settings across most conditions (all P < .05), with the greatest absolute increase of inhaled dose was observed in dry circuits without exhaled humidity (11-22%). This effect was reduced to 4-7% with the use of exhaled humidity in both dry and heated humidified circuits. Proximal nebulizer placement yielded higher doses than distal placement under high settings in dry circuits without exhaled humidity, but this difference was diminished or absent when exhaled humidity or heated humidification were introduced. Bias flow and adapter type had minimal impact on inhaled dose, except in specific conditions under dry circuit without exhaled humidity. Conclusions: In dry circuits without exhaled humidity, aerosol delivery was substantially affected by ventilator settings and nebulizer placement, whereas bias flow and circuit adapter types had no notable impact. However, the effects of ventilator settings and nebulizer placement diminished in circuits with exhaled humidity or heated humidification.

有创通气过程中影响气溶胶输送的因素。
背景:有几个因素会影响机械通气过程中的气溶胶输送,如患者特征、设备配置和呼吸机设置。本研究旨在评估呼吸机设置、加湿、雾化器位置、偏置流和电路适配器如何影响有创通气期间的气溶胶输送。方法:采用体外模型,在有创通气条件下,通过振动网状雾化器对沙丁胺醇(2.5 mg/ 3ml)进行28种条件下的雾化给药试验。采用系统的逐步排除方法,分三个阶段:(1)干电路,(2)带呼出湿度的干电路,(3)带呼出湿度的加热加湿电路。变量包括呼吸机设置(高vs低)、雾化器位置(气管内管近端vs远端)、偏置流量(2 vs 5 L/min)和电路适配器(Y型vs v型)。被认为不重要的变量在后期阶段逐渐被排除。每种情况测试5次。用滤光片收集药物沉积,洗脱,并用276 nm紫外分光光度法定量。结果:在大多数情况下,与较低设置相比,高呼吸机设置显著增加吸入剂量(均P < 0.05),在没有呼出湿度的干燥回路中观察到吸入剂量的绝对增加最大(11-22%)。在干燥和加热加湿电路中使用呼出的湿度,这种影响减少到4-7%。在没有呼出湿度的干燥回路中,在高设置下,近端雾化器放置比远端雾化器放置产生更高的剂量,但当引入呼出湿度或加热加湿时,这种差异减少或不存在。除了在没有呼出湿度的干回路的特定条件下,偏流和适配器类型对吸入剂量的影响最小。结论:在没有呼出湿度的干燥电路中,气溶胶输送受到呼吸机设置和雾化器放置的显著影响,而偏流和电路适配器类型没有显著影响。然而,在呼出湿度或加热加湿的电路中,通风机设置和雾化器放置的影响减弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信