Differential effects of dual antiplatelet and dual antithrombotic therapy on hemostasis in chronic coronary syndrome patients: the DEFINE CCS study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 CELL BIOLOGY
Platelets Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-03 DOI:10.1080/09537104.2025.2524624
Tony Haddad, Osama Elkhateeb, Lawrence Title, Ata Quraishi, Wan Cheol Kim, Ali Hillani, Scott Grandy, Stefan S Heinze, Finn Eichhorn, Hannah Harquail, John Sapp, William Parker, Shamir R Mehta, Robert F Storey, Wael Sumaya
{"title":"Differential effects of dual antiplatelet and dual antithrombotic therapy on hemostasis in chronic coronary syndrome patients: the DEFINE CCS study.","authors":"Tony Haddad, Osama Elkhateeb, Lawrence Title, Ata Quraishi, Wan Cheol Kim, Ali Hillani, Scott Grandy, Stefan S Heinze, Finn Eichhorn, Hannah Harquail, John Sapp, William Parker, Shamir R Mehta, Robert F Storey, Wael Sumaya","doi":"10.1080/09537104.2025.2524624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Optimal long term antithrombotic treatment in high-risk chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients remains uncertain. Both ticagrelor (60 mg BID) and low-dose rivaroxaban (2.5 mg BID) in addition to low-dose aspirin resulted in significant reductions in major cardiovascular events in high-risk patients at the expense of increased bleeding risk. We aimed to compare the effects of both strategies on bleeding time, fibrin clot lysis time and inflammatory biomarkers in CCS patients with history of acute coronary syndrome. Twenty aspirin-treated patients were recruited into a randomized crossover study to receive ticagrelor 60 mg BID in 1 week and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg BID in the other with a 2-week washout period in between. Outcome measures were determined at the start and end of each treatment week. Two-way ANOVA was used to determine difference in treatment effect. Data are presented as mean ± SD. At baseline, there was no significant difference in any studied outcome measure. Bleeding time was significantly longer with ticagrelor compared to rivaroxaban (Ticagrelor: 897 ± 481secs vs. Rivaroxaban: 440 ± 184 secs; <i>p</i> = .0001). Fibrin clot lysis time was not impacted by ticagrelor but significantly dropped post treatment with rivaroxaban (Ticagrelor: 5743 ± 2590 secs vs. Rivaroxaban: 4309 ± 2308 secs; <i>p</i> = .0049). Neither treatment had an impact on levels of high-sensitivity CRP or white cell count. In conclusion, ticagrelor 60 mg BID has greater impact on bleeding time compared to rivaroxaban 2.5 mg BID. Whereas rivaroxaban, positively modulates fibrin clots, rendering them more prone to lysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":20268,"journal":{"name":"Platelets","volume":"36 1","pages":"2524624"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Platelets","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09537104.2025.2524624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimal long term antithrombotic treatment in high-risk chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients remains uncertain. Both ticagrelor (60 mg BID) and low-dose rivaroxaban (2.5 mg BID) in addition to low-dose aspirin resulted in significant reductions in major cardiovascular events in high-risk patients at the expense of increased bleeding risk. We aimed to compare the effects of both strategies on bleeding time, fibrin clot lysis time and inflammatory biomarkers in CCS patients with history of acute coronary syndrome. Twenty aspirin-treated patients were recruited into a randomized crossover study to receive ticagrelor 60 mg BID in 1 week and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg BID in the other with a 2-week washout period in between. Outcome measures were determined at the start and end of each treatment week. Two-way ANOVA was used to determine difference in treatment effect. Data are presented as mean ± SD. At baseline, there was no significant difference in any studied outcome measure. Bleeding time was significantly longer with ticagrelor compared to rivaroxaban (Ticagrelor: 897 ± 481secs vs. Rivaroxaban: 440 ± 184 secs; p = .0001). Fibrin clot lysis time was not impacted by ticagrelor but significantly dropped post treatment with rivaroxaban (Ticagrelor: 5743 ± 2590 secs vs. Rivaroxaban: 4309 ± 2308 secs; p = .0049). Neither treatment had an impact on levels of high-sensitivity CRP or white cell count. In conclusion, ticagrelor 60 mg BID has greater impact on bleeding time compared to rivaroxaban 2.5 mg BID. Whereas rivaroxaban, positively modulates fibrin clots, rendering them more prone to lysis.

双重抗血小板和双重抗血栓治疗对慢性冠状动脉综合征患者止血的不同影响:DEFINE CCS研究
高危慢性冠状动脉综合征(CCS)患者的最佳长期抗血栓治疗仍不确定。替格瑞洛(60mg BID)和低剂量利伐沙班(2.5 mg BID)以及低剂量阿司匹林均可显著降低高危患者的主要心血管事件,但代价是出血风险增加。我们的目的是比较两种策略对有急性冠状动脉综合征病史的CCS患者出血时间、纤维蛋白凝块溶解时间和炎症生物标志物的影响。20名接受阿司匹林治疗的患者被招募到一项随机交叉研究中,在1周内接受替格瑞洛60mg BID,在另一周内接受利伐沙班2.5 mg BID,中间有2周的洗脱期。结果测量在每个治疗周开始和结束时确定。采用双因素方差分析确定治疗效果的差异。数据以mean±SD表示。在基线时,任何研究结果测量均无显著差异。替格瑞洛的出血时间明显长于利伐沙班(替格瑞洛:897±481sec vs利伐沙班:440±184 sec;p = 0.0001)。替格瑞洛对纤维蛋白凝块溶解时间没有影响,但利伐沙班治疗后纤维蛋白凝块溶解时间显著缩短(替格瑞洛:5743±2590秒vs利伐沙班:4309±2308秒;p = .0049)。两种治疗方法对高敏CRP水平和白细胞计数都没有影响。综上所述,替格瑞洛60mg BID对出血时间的影响大于利伐沙班2.5 mg BID。而利伐沙班正向调节纤维蛋白凝块,使其更容易溶解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Platelets
Platelets 医学-细胞生物学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Platelets is an international, peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of platelet- and megakaryocyte-related research. Platelets provides the opportunity for contributors and readers across scientific disciplines to engage with new information about blood platelets. The journal’s Methods section aims to improve standardization between laboratories and to help researchers replicate difficult methods. Research areas include: Platelet function Biochemistry Signal transduction Pharmacology and therapeutics Interaction with other cells in the blood vessel wall The contribution of platelets and platelet-derived products to health and disease The journal publishes original articles, fast-track articles, review articles, systematic reviews, methods papers, short communications, case reports, opinion articles, commentaries, gene of the issue, and letters to the editor. Platelets operates a single-blind peer review policy. Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信