Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Injections for Epiphora Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Abdulrahman Alfarhan, Abdulrahman Alsubhi, Ghadeer Daghistani, Mohammed Khoshhal, Anas Alsaif, Eman M Al-Sharif, Mashael Alkhayyal, Hamad Alsulaiman
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Injections for Epiphora Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Abdulrahman Alfarhan, Abdulrahman Alsubhi, Ghadeer Daghistani, Mohammed Khoshhal, Anas Alsaif, Eman M Al-Sharif, Mashael Alkhayyal, Hamad Alsulaiman","doi":"10.1097/IOP.0000000000002986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacrimal gland botulinum toxin (BTX) injection for managing epiphora.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases was conducted to include studies published from 2000 to March 2024 that evaluated patients treated with lacrimal gland BTX injections for epiphora. Data extraction covered study design, patient demographics, types of BTX used, injection techniques, dosage, follow-up duration, and outcomes, including (Schirmer test and Munk scores) and adverse events. Methodological quality was assessed for each study type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 517 studies identified in the literature search, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria involving 415 glands injected with BTX. Schirmer test scores decreased at 3 months (mean difference = 8.80; 95% confidence interval: 5.28-12.32; p < 0.01) and at 6 months (mean difference = 5.33; 95% confidence interval: 2.77-7.90; p < 0.01). The overall incidence of adverse events was 22% (95% confidence interval: 12-32%), and ptosis (63%) and diplopia (21%) were the most common. Reinjection was more common in the functional epiphora group, with a pooled rate of 81%, compared with 43% in the nonfunctional group (p = 0.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Injecting as little as 2.5 units of BTX into the lacrimal gland is effective in reducing tear production in epiphora, with sustained clinical benefits and a transient adverse event profile. These findings support its use as a nonsurgical alternative, particularly for patients ineligible for or averse to invasive procedures. Further studies are needed to refine dosing and long-term efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19588,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000002986","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacrimal gland botulinum toxin (BTX) injection for managing epiphora.

Methods: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases was conducted to include studies published from 2000 to March 2024 that evaluated patients treated with lacrimal gland BTX injections for epiphora. Data extraction covered study design, patient demographics, types of BTX used, injection techniques, dosage, follow-up duration, and outcomes, including (Schirmer test and Munk scores) and adverse events. Methodological quality was assessed for each study type.

Results: From 517 studies identified in the literature search, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria involving 415 glands injected with BTX. Schirmer test scores decreased at 3 months (mean difference = 8.80; 95% confidence interval: 5.28-12.32; p < 0.01) and at 6 months (mean difference = 5.33; 95% confidence interval: 2.77-7.90; p < 0.01). The overall incidence of adverse events was 22% (95% confidence interval: 12-32%), and ptosis (63%) and diplopia (21%) were the most common. Reinjection was more common in the functional epiphora group, with a pooled rate of 81%, compared with 43% in the nonfunctional group (p = 0.12).

Conclusions: Injecting as little as 2.5 units of BTX into the lacrimal gland is effective in reducing tear production in epiphora, with sustained clinical benefits and a transient adverse event profile. These findings support its use as a nonsurgical alternative, particularly for patients ineligible for or averse to invasive procedures. Further studies are needed to refine dosing and long-term efficacy.

肉毒毒素注射治疗眼炎的疗效和安全性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析评价泪腺肉毒毒素(BTX)注射治疗泪溢的疗效和安全性。方法:使用系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,对MEDLINE、Cochrane CENTRAL和EMBASE数据库进行全面搜索,包括2000年至2024年3月发表的评估泪腺BTX注射治疗泪显的患者的研究。数据提取包括研究设计、患者人口统计、使用BTX的类型、注射技术、剂量、随访时间和结果,包括(Schirmer试验和Munk评分)和不良事件。评估每种研究类型的方法学质量。结果:在文献检索中发现的517项研究中,有19项研究符合纳入标准,涉及415个注射BTX的腺体。Schirmer测试成绩在3个月时下降(平均差异= 8.80;95%置信区间:5.28-12.32;P < 0.01)和6个月时(平均差异= 5.33;95%置信区间:2.77-7.90;P < 0.01)。不良事件的总发生率为22%(95%可信区间:12-32%),其中最常见的是上睑下垂(63%)和复视(21%)。回注在功能组更为常见,合并率为81%,而非功能组为43% (p = 0.12)。结论:向泪腺注射2.5单位BTX可有效减少泪液分泌,具有持续的临床益处和短暂的不良事件。这些发现支持将其作为非手术替代方法,特别是对于不适合或不喜欢侵入性手术的患者。需要进一步的研究来完善剂量和长期疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
322
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery features original articles and reviews on topics such as ptosis, eyelid reconstruction, orbital diagnosis and surgery, lacrimal problems, and eyelid malposition. Update reports on diagnostic techniques, surgical equipment and instrumentation, and medical therapies are included, as well as detailed analyses of recent research findings and their clinical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信