Utility of intraoperative ultrasonography in laparoscopic nonanatomical liver resection - results from National Polish registry of minimally invasive liver surgery.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Wojciech A Serednicki, Wacław Hołówko, Aleksander Tarasik, Stanisław Pierściński, Piotr Hogendorf, Jerzy Mielko, Michał Wysocki, Anna Dąbrowska, Michał Pędziwiatr
{"title":"Utility of intraoperative ultrasonography in laparoscopic nonanatomical liver resection - results from National Polish registry of minimally invasive liver surgery.","authors":"Wojciech A Serednicki, Wacław Hołówko, Aleksander Tarasik, Stanisław Pierściński, Piotr Hogendorf, Jerzy Mielko, Michał Wysocki, Anna Dąbrowska, Michał Pędziwiatr","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03790-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), being an established method, strongly relies on preoperative and intraoperative imaging. The aim of this study is to assess the utility, with a primary focus on oncological radicality, of intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography (IOUS) in nonanatomical laparoscopic liver resections data based on National Polish Registry of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational multicenter cohort study involving data from 8 Polish liver surgery departments was conducted. Patients who underwent minimally invasive nonanatomical liver resection in the years 2010-2024 in Poland were included in the research. Patients were divided into a control group without intraoperative ultrasonography and a study group with IOUS. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the perioperative results of IOUS usage in LLR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study results show that IOUS is associated with a considerably higher R0 resection margin (91,6% vs. 84,2%, p = 0,039) with, yet not statistically significant, but higher textbook outcome (82,8% vs. 78,2%, p = 0,258). Other results, such as intraoperative blood loss (median 200 ml vs. 150 ml, p = 0,62 and transfusion rate (9,3% vs. 9,7%, p = 0,896), as well as postoperative complications (11,2% vs. 11,6%, p = 0,175) were similar in both groups. IOUS is associated with longer operation time (median 200 min. vs. 140 min., p < 0,001), however, it is chosen by liver surgeons in more difficult cases (28,4% vs. 15,2% posterosuperior segments, p = 0,003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic intraoperative ultrasonography is a useful tool in non-anatomical liver surgery, that ensures oncologic radicality with similar other outcomes compared to no IOUS usage. Therefore, it should be considered as mandatory in LLR. Furthermore, IOUS training programmes should be weighed into being a part of LLR training programmes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"212"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226628/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03790-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), being an established method, strongly relies on preoperative and intraoperative imaging. The aim of this study is to assess the utility, with a primary focus on oncological radicality, of intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography (IOUS) in nonanatomical laparoscopic liver resections data based on National Polish Registry of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery.

Methods: An observational multicenter cohort study involving data from 8 Polish liver surgery departments was conducted. Patients who underwent minimally invasive nonanatomical liver resection in the years 2010-2024 in Poland were included in the research. Patients were divided into a control group without intraoperative ultrasonography and a study group with IOUS. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the perioperative results of IOUS usage in LLR.

Results: Study results show that IOUS is associated with a considerably higher R0 resection margin (91,6% vs. 84,2%, p = 0,039) with, yet not statistically significant, but higher textbook outcome (82,8% vs. 78,2%, p = 0,258). Other results, such as intraoperative blood loss (median 200 ml vs. 150 ml, p = 0,62 and transfusion rate (9,3% vs. 9,7%, p = 0,896), as well as postoperative complications (11,2% vs. 11,6%, p = 0,175) were similar in both groups. IOUS is associated with longer operation time (median 200 min. vs. 140 min., p < 0,001), however, it is chosen by liver surgeons in more difficult cases (28,4% vs. 15,2% posterosuperior segments, p = 0,003).

Conclusion: Laparoscopic intraoperative ultrasonography is a useful tool in non-anatomical liver surgery, that ensures oncologic radicality with similar other outcomes compared to no IOUS usage. Therefore, it should be considered as mandatory in LLR. Furthermore, IOUS training programmes should be weighed into being a part of LLR training programmes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

术中超声检查在腹腔镜非解剖性肝切除术中的应用——来自波兰国家微创肝手术登记处的结果。
目的:腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)是一种成熟的手术方法,其术前及术中影像学检查是其重要依据。本研究的目的是评估基于波兰国家微创肝手术登记处的非解剖性腹腔镜肝切除术数据的术中腹腔镜超声检查(IOUS)的效用,主要关注肿瘤的根治性。方法:采用观察性多中心队列研究,纳入波兰8个肝外科科室的资料。2010-2024年在波兰接受微创非解剖性肝切除术的患者被纳入研究。将患者分为术中无超声检查的对照组和有欠条检查的研究组。通过统计学分析评估小静脉曲张在小静脉曲张中的围手术期使用效果。结果:研究结果显示,欠条与相当高的R0切除边缘相关(91.6%对84.2%,p = 0,039),但没有统计学意义,但教科书结果较高(82,8%对78,2%,p = 0,258)。其他结果,如术中出血量(中位数200 ml对150 ml, p = 0,62)和输液率(9.3%对9.7%,p = 0,896)以及术后并发症(11.2%对11.6%,p = 0,175)在两组中相似。结论:腹腔镜术中超声检查在非解剖性肝脏手术中是一种有用的工具,可确保肿瘤的根治性,与不使用欠条相比,其他结果相似。因此,它应该被认为是强制性的在LLR。此外,应考虑将借据培训方案作为LLR培训方案的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信