Commercial Price Variation in Ophthalmology.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Alexander P Philips, Christopher Whaley
{"title":"Commercial Price Variation in Ophthalmology.","authors":"Alexander P Philips, Christopher Whaley","doi":"10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.1693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the variation in commercial insurance payment rates for common ophthalmology procedures across major national insurers and identify patterns in professional and facility fees.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study used January 2025 Transparency in Coverage data, payment rates negotiated between insurers and health care professionals from 4 large national insurers (Blue Cross Blue Shield, United Healthcare, Cigna, and Aetna) for 10 common ophthalmology procedures. Data included approximately 684 506 professional fee price points from 15 788 physicians and 55 930 facility fee price points from 4697 facilities. Data were analyzed January through March 2025.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcomes were the distribution of negotiated prices (mean, median, percentiles), coefficients of variation, and volume-weighted price indices by payer for professional and facility payments by commercial insurers. Geographic variation in pricing was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Negotiated facility fees showed substantially greater price variation than professional fees across all ophthalmology procedures, with facility coefficients of variation exceeding professional coefficients by factors of 2 to 4. Blue Cross Blue Shield maintained consistently higher payments (14% above market average for professional fees; 13% above for facility fees), while Aetna demonstrated dramatic variation with professional fees 54% below average but facility fees 45% above average. Geographic analysis revealed substantial state-level variability, with facility prices for standard cataract surgeries showing up to 5-fold differences between upper and lower bounds across states.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study reveals substantial variability in commercial insurance payment rates for ophthalmology procedures, particularly in facility fees. These findings indicate that market dynamics, insurer-health care professional negotiations, and geographic factors substantially influence price variation, which has important implications for health care affordability and access to ophthalmologic care.</p>","PeriodicalId":14518,"journal":{"name":"JAMA ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.1693","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the variation in commercial insurance payment rates for common ophthalmology procedures across major national insurers and identify patterns in professional and facility fees.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study used January 2025 Transparency in Coverage data, payment rates negotiated between insurers and health care professionals from 4 large national insurers (Blue Cross Blue Shield, United Healthcare, Cigna, and Aetna) for 10 common ophthalmology procedures. Data included approximately 684 506 professional fee price points from 15 788 physicians and 55 930 facility fee price points from 4697 facilities. Data were analyzed January through March 2025.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcomes were the distribution of negotiated prices (mean, median, percentiles), coefficients of variation, and volume-weighted price indices by payer for professional and facility payments by commercial insurers. Geographic variation in pricing was also assessed.

Results: Negotiated facility fees showed substantially greater price variation than professional fees across all ophthalmology procedures, with facility coefficients of variation exceeding professional coefficients by factors of 2 to 4. Blue Cross Blue Shield maintained consistently higher payments (14% above market average for professional fees; 13% above for facility fees), while Aetna demonstrated dramatic variation with professional fees 54% below average but facility fees 45% above average. Geographic analysis revealed substantial state-level variability, with facility prices for standard cataract surgeries showing up to 5-fold differences between upper and lower bounds across states.

Conclusions and relevance: This study reveals substantial variability in commercial insurance payment rates for ophthalmology procedures, particularly in facility fees. These findings indicate that market dynamics, insurer-health care professional negotiations, and geographic factors substantially influence price variation, which has important implications for health care affordability and access to ophthalmologic care.

眼科的商业价格变化。
目的:评估国家主要保险公司在普通眼科手术的商业保险支付率的差异,并确定专业和设施费用的模式。设计、设置和参与者:本横断面研究使用2025年1月覆盖透明度数据,保险公司与4家大型国家保险公司(蓝十字蓝盾、联合医疗、信诺和安泰)的医疗保健专业人员就10项常见眼科手术协商的支付率。数据包括来自15 788名医生的大约684 506个专业费用价格点和来自4697个机构的55 930个设施费用价格点。研究人员分析了2025年1月至3月的数据。主要结果和措施:主要结果是协商价格(平均值、中位数、百分位数)、变异系数和商业保险公司专业和设施付款付款人的体积加权价格指数的分布。还评估了定价的地理差异。结果:在所有眼科手术中,协商机构费用的价格变化明显大于专业费用,机构变化系数超过专业系数的2到4倍。蓝十字蓝盾持续保持较高的支付水平(比市场平均水平高出14%);安泰表现出了巨大的差异,专业费用比平均水平低54%,而设施费用比平均水平高45%。地理分析显示各州之间存在很大差异,标准白内障手术的设备价格在各州之间的上限和下限相差高达5倍。结论和相关性:本研究揭示了眼科手术商业保险支付率的实质性变化,特别是在设施费用方面。研究结果表明,市场动态、保险公司与医疗保健专业人员的谈判和地理因素对价格变化具有重要影响,这对医疗保健的可负担性和眼科护理的可及性具有重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA ophthalmology
JAMA ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
340
期刊介绍: JAMA Ophthalmology, with a rich history of continuous publication since 1869, stands as a distinguished international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to ophthalmology and visual science. In 2019, the journal proudly commemorated 150 years of uninterrupted service to the field. As a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, a consortium renowned for its peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Ophthalmology upholds the highest standards of excellence in disseminating cutting-edge research and insights. Join us in celebrating our legacy and advancing the frontiers of ophthalmology and visual science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信