Comparison of clinical and imaging features of cerebral small vessel disease associated with heterozygous HTRA1 and NOTCH3 mutations.

IF 8.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yi-Chung Lee, Chih-Hao Chen, Ying-Tsen Chou, Yu-Wen Cheng, Chih-Ping Chung, Ying-Da Chen, Feng-Chi Chang, Sung-Chun Tang, Yi-Chu Liao
{"title":"Comparison of clinical and imaging features of cerebral small vessel disease associated with heterozygous <i>HTRA1</i> and <i>NOTCH3</i> mutations.","authors":"Yi-Chung Lee, Chih-Hao Chen, Ying-Tsen Chou, Yu-Wen Cheng, Chih-Ping Chung, Ying-Da Chen, Feng-Chi Chang, Sung-Chun Tang, Yi-Chu Liao","doi":"10.1177/17474930251359110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heterozygous <i>HTRA1</i> mutations are the second most common cause of monogenic dominant cerebral small vessel disease (<i>HTRA1</i>-AD-cSVD or CADASIL2), after cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) due to <i>NOTCH3</i> cysteine-altering mutations. However, there have been few studies of cohorts of <i>HTRA1</i>-AD-cSVD and whether it can be differentiated clinically and on neuroimaging from CADASIL is unclear.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This retrospective study aims to characterize and compare the clinical and neuroimaging features of <i>HTRA1</i>-AD-cSVD with those of CADASIL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 21 unrelated Taiwanese subjects carrying 15 heterozygous <i>HTRA1</i> variants, all functionally validated as pathogenic through in vitro protease activity assays. <i>HTRA1</i>-AD-cSVD patients were compared with 406 CADASIL patients, including 44 cases carrying <i>NOTCH3</i> mutations within the high-risk epidermal growth factor-like repeat domains (EGFr), 358 with moderate-risk EGFr mutations, and 4 with low-risk EGFr mutations. Multivariate regression analyses were conducted with adjustments for age at MRI examination and hypertension.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stroke occurred in 81.0% of <i>HTRA1</i>-AD-cSVD patients, and 47.6% exhibited cognitive dysfunction. MRI revealed moderate-to-severe white matter hyperintensity (WMH) in the deep white matter and external capsule (modified Scheltens' scale: 5.3 ± 1.0 and 4.1 ± 1.7), mild WMH in the temporal pole (1.0 ± 1.7), lacunes in 90.5%, ⩾10 cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) in 66.7%, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) lesions in 46.7%, indicating susceptibility to both ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. Patients with <i>HTRA1</i> loss-of-function mutations or protease domain missense mutations exhibited a higher prevalence of ⩾10 CMBs on SWI/T2* imaging (100% and 83.3%) compared to those with missense mutations outside this domain (20%). Symptom onset occurred earliest in patients with <i>NOTCH3</i> high-risk EGFr mutations (49.2 ± 10.5 years), followed by those with heterozygous <i>HTRA1</i> mutations (54.3 ± 10.7 years), and latest in <i>NOTCH3</i> moderate-risk EGFr mutations carriers (59.7 ± 9.5 years). Temporal pole involvement was most prevalent in <i>NOTCH3</i> high-risk EGFr mutations (88.6%), followed by <i>NOTCH3</i> moderate-risk EGFr mutations (32.4%), and least common in heterozygous <i>HTRA1</i> mutations (28.6%). Even after adjusting for age and hypertension, <i>HTRA1</i>-AD-cSVD patients exhibited significantly milder temporal pole WMH severity compared to <i>NOTCH3</i> high-risk EGFr mutation carriers (adjusted <i>p</i> < 0.001). In addition, ICH lesions were more frequently observed in <i>HTRA1</i>-AD-cSVD patients (46.7%) than in patients with <i>NOTCH3</i> high-risk or moderate-risk EGFr mutations (18.2% and 21.2%), although the difference was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><i>HTRA1</i>-AD-cSVD shares overlapping clinical and neuroimaging features with CADASIL. Temporal pole WMH involvement can occur in <i>HTRA1</i>-AD-cSVD but is more common in CADASIL. The high prevalence of ICH in <i>HTRA1</i>-AD-cSVD has been under-recognized.Data access statement:Data are available upon reasonable request from third parties.</p>","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"17474930251359110"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930251359110","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Heterozygous HTRA1 mutations are the second most common cause of monogenic dominant cerebral small vessel disease (HTRA1-AD-cSVD or CADASIL2), after cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) due to NOTCH3 cysteine-altering mutations. However, there have been few studies of cohorts of HTRA1-AD-cSVD and whether it can be differentiated clinically and on neuroimaging from CADASIL is unclear.

Aims: This retrospective study aims to characterize and compare the clinical and neuroimaging features of HTRA1-AD-cSVD with those of CADASIL.

Methods: We identified 21 unrelated Taiwanese subjects carrying 15 heterozygous HTRA1 variants, all functionally validated as pathogenic through in vitro protease activity assays. HTRA1-AD-cSVD patients were compared with 406 CADASIL patients, including 44 cases carrying NOTCH3 mutations within the high-risk epidermal growth factor-like repeat domains (EGFr), 358 with moderate-risk EGFr mutations, and 4 with low-risk EGFr mutations. Multivariate regression analyses were conducted with adjustments for age at MRI examination and hypertension.

Results: Stroke occurred in 81.0% of HTRA1-AD-cSVD patients, and 47.6% exhibited cognitive dysfunction. MRI revealed moderate-to-severe white matter hyperintensity (WMH) in the deep white matter and external capsule (modified Scheltens' scale: 5.3 ± 1.0 and 4.1 ± 1.7), mild WMH in the temporal pole (1.0 ± 1.7), lacunes in 90.5%, ⩾10 cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) in 66.7%, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) lesions in 46.7%, indicating susceptibility to both ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. Patients with HTRA1 loss-of-function mutations or protease domain missense mutations exhibited a higher prevalence of ⩾10 CMBs on SWI/T2* imaging (100% and 83.3%) compared to those with missense mutations outside this domain (20%). Symptom onset occurred earliest in patients with NOTCH3 high-risk EGFr mutations (49.2 ± 10.5 years), followed by those with heterozygous HTRA1 mutations (54.3 ± 10.7 years), and latest in NOTCH3 moderate-risk EGFr mutations carriers (59.7 ± 9.5 years). Temporal pole involvement was most prevalent in NOTCH3 high-risk EGFr mutations (88.6%), followed by NOTCH3 moderate-risk EGFr mutations (32.4%), and least common in heterozygous HTRA1 mutations (28.6%). Even after adjusting for age and hypertension, HTRA1-AD-cSVD patients exhibited significantly milder temporal pole WMH severity compared to NOTCH3 high-risk EGFr mutation carriers (adjusted p < 0.001). In addition, ICH lesions were more frequently observed in HTRA1-AD-cSVD patients (46.7%) than in patients with NOTCH3 high-risk or moderate-risk EGFr mutations (18.2% and 21.2%), although the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: HTRA1-AD-cSVD shares overlapping clinical and neuroimaging features with CADASIL. Temporal pole WMH involvement can occur in HTRA1-AD-cSVD but is more common in CADASIL. The high prevalence of ICH in HTRA1-AD-cSVD has been under-recognized.Data access statement:Data are available upon reasonable request from third parties.

EXPRESS:杂合HTRA1和NOTCH3突变相关脑血管病的临床和影像学特征比较
背景:杂合性HTRA1突变是单基因显性脑小血管病(HTRA1- ad - csvd或CADASIL2)的第二大常见原因,仅次于常染色体显性脑动脉病伴皮层下梗死和脑白质病(CADASIL),这是由于NOTCH3半胱氨酸改变突变引起的。然而,HTRA1-AD-cSVD的队列研究很少,临床和神经影像学上是否能与CADASIL区分尚不清楚。目的:本回顾性研究旨在描述和比较HTRA1-AD-cSVD与CADASIL的临床和神经影像学特征。方法:我们鉴定了21名不相关的台湾受试者,携带15种杂合HTRA1变异,通过体外蛋白酶活性测定,所有变异在功能上都被证实具有致病性。HTRA1-AD-cSVD患者与406例CADASIL患者进行比较,其中44例在高危表皮生长因子样重复结构域(EGFr)内携带NOTCH3突变,358例中危EGFr突变,4例低危EGFr突变。进行多因素回归分析,调整MRI检查年龄和高血压。结果:81.0%的HTRA1-AD-cSVD患者发生脑卒中,47.6%出现认知功能障碍。MRI表现为深部白质及外包膜中重度白质高信号(WMH)(改良Scheltens评分:5.3±1.0和4.1±1.7),颞极轻度白质高信号(1.0±1.7),90.5%为凹窝,66.7%为脑微出血(CMBs)≥10,46.7%为颅内出血(ICH)病变,提示缺血性和出血性卒中易感。HTRA1功能缺失突变或蛋白酶结构域错义突变的患者在SWI/T2*成像上显示≥10 CMBs的患病率(100%和83.3%)高于该结构域外错义突变的患者(20%)。NOTCH3高危EGFr突变患者出现症状最早(49.2±10.5年),其次是杂合HTRA1突变患者(54.3±10.7年),NOTCH3中高危EGFr突变携带者出现症状最晚(59.7±9.5年)。颞极累及在NOTCH3高危EGFr突变中最为普遍(88.6%),其次是NOTCH3中高危EGFr突变(32.4%),在杂合HTRA1突变中最不常见(28.6%)。即使在调整了年龄和高血压因素后,与NOTCH3高危EGFr突变携带者相比,HTRA1-AD-cSVD患者的颞极WMH严重程度也明显较轻(调整后p < 0.001)。此外,HTRA1-AD-cSVD患者出现脑出血病变的频率(46.7%)高于NOTCH3高危或中危EGFr突变患者(18.2%和21.2%),但差异无统计学意义。结论:HTRA1-AD-cSVD与CADASIL具有重叠的临床和神经影像学特征。颞极受累可发生在HTRA1-AD-cSVD中,但在CADASIL中更为常见。脑出血在HTRA1-AD-cSVD中的高患病率尚未得到充分认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Stroke
International Journal of Stroke 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
6.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信