Safety and efficacy of a lattice-tip catheter for ventricular arrhythmia ablation: the Affera Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation (AVAAR) Registry.

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Europace Pub Date : 2025-07-02 DOI:10.1093/europace/euaf139
Frédéric Sacher, Andrea Sarkozy, Helmut Pürerfellner, Alexandra Steyer, Jonathan Lyne, Charlène Coquard, Romain Tixier, Nicolas Combes, Michel Haissaguerre, Michalis Efremidis, Josselin Duchateau, Victor Castro Urda, Claire A Martin, Marc Lemoine, Alejandro Carta Bergaz, Frank Bogun, Nick Linton, Nicolas Derval, Filip Schlosser, Thomas Pambrun, Jan Petru, Meleze Hocini, Luigi Pannone, Martin Mudroch, Josef Kautzner, Pierre Jais, Tobias Reichlin, Petr Neužil, Petr Peichl
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of a lattice-tip catheter for ventricular arrhythmia ablation: the Affera Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation (AVAAR) Registry.","authors":"Frédéric Sacher, Andrea Sarkozy, Helmut Pürerfellner, Alexandra Steyer, Jonathan Lyne, Charlène Coquard, Romain Tixier, Nicolas Combes, Michel Haissaguerre, Michalis Efremidis, Josselin Duchateau, Victor Castro Urda, Claire A Martin, Marc Lemoine, Alejandro Carta Bergaz, Frank Bogun, Nick Linton, Nicolas Derval, Filip Schlosser, Thomas Pambrun, Jan Petru, Meleze Hocini, Luigi Pannone, Martin Mudroch, Josef Kautzner, Pierre Jais, Tobias Reichlin, Petr Neužil, Petr Peichl","doi":"10.1093/europace/euaf139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The feasibility and safety of the lattice-tip catheter for ventricular arrhythmia (VA) ablation in humans remain largely unknown. This study aimed to assess feasibility, safety profile as well as patient outcomes after VA ablation with a lattice-tip catheter in a multicenter European registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All 18 European centers using the AFFERA system on September 2024 agreed to participate. Clinical, procedural, and follow-up data (minimum 3 months) were systematically collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 126 patients (18% female; mean age 59 ±16 years) underwent VA ablation using the lattice-tip catheter during the inclusion period. Ablation indications included ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 99, premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) in 23, and ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 4 patients.Major and minor acute complications were observed in 7 (6%) and 18 (14%) procedures, respectively. They included thrombo-embolic event (n=2), major bleeding (n=2), ventricular fibrillation induction (n=1), tamponade due to epicardial access (n=1), cardiogenic shock due to prolonged VT mapping (n=1). Within the first month post-procedure, 3 patients died (from multi-organ failure (n=2) and sepsis (n=1)), 2 had worsening heart failure, 1 myocardial infarction, 1 sepsis and 1 major gastro-intestinal bleeding. After a mean follow-up of 5.6 ±3.7 months, absence of recurrence was 78% for PVC, 70% for VT, and 100% for VF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this complex population with refractory VA, ablation using the lattice-tip catheter appears feasible and relatively safe. In the absence of large, randomized trials, exhaustive registry is of key importance to ensure safety and efficacy of new catheter technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11981,"journal":{"name":"Europace","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europace","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf139","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The feasibility and safety of the lattice-tip catheter for ventricular arrhythmia (VA) ablation in humans remain largely unknown. This study aimed to assess feasibility, safety profile as well as patient outcomes after VA ablation with a lattice-tip catheter in a multicenter European registry.

Methods: All 18 European centers using the AFFERA system on September 2024 agreed to participate. Clinical, procedural, and follow-up data (minimum 3 months) were systematically collected and analyzed.

Results: A total of 126 patients (18% female; mean age 59 ±16 years) underwent VA ablation using the lattice-tip catheter during the inclusion period. Ablation indications included ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 99, premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) in 23, and ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 4 patients.Major and minor acute complications were observed in 7 (6%) and 18 (14%) procedures, respectively. They included thrombo-embolic event (n=2), major bleeding (n=2), ventricular fibrillation induction (n=1), tamponade due to epicardial access (n=1), cardiogenic shock due to prolonged VT mapping (n=1). Within the first month post-procedure, 3 patients died (from multi-organ failure (n=2) and sepsis (n=1)), 2 had worsening heart failure, 1 myocardial infarction, 1 sepsis and 1 major gastro-intestinal bleeding. After a mean follow-up of 5.6 ±3.7 months, absence of recurrence was 78% for PVC, 70% for VT, and 100% for VF.

Conclusion: In this complex population with refractory VA, ablation using the lattice-tip catheter appears feasible and relatively safe. In the absence of large, randomized trials, exhaustive registry is of key importance to ensure safety and efficacy of new catheter technologies.

格尖导管用于室性心律失常消融的安全性和有效性:后室性心律失常消融(AVAAR)登记。
背景:格尖导管用于室性心律失常(VA)消融的可行性和安全性在很大程度上仍然未知。本研究旨在评估欧洲多中心格尖导管室间隔消融的可行性、安全性以及患者预后。方法:所有使用AFFERA系统的18个欧洲中心于2024年9月同意参与。系统地收集和分析临床、手术和随访数据(至少3个月)。结果:共126例患者(女性18%;平均年龄59±16岁)在纳入期间接受了格尖导管室间隔消融。消融指征包括室性心动过速99例,室性早搏23例,室性颤动4例。在7例(6%)和18例(14%)手术中分别观察到严重和轻微的急性并发症。其中包括血栓栓塞事件(n=2)、大出血(n=2)、室性颤动诱发(n=1)、心外膜通路引起的心包填塞(n=1)、室性室速测图延长引起的心源性休克(n=1)。术后1个月内,3例患者死亡(多器官功能衰竭(n=2)和脓毒症(n=1)), 2例心衰加重,1例心肌梗死,1例脓毒症,1例大出血。平均随访5.6±3.7个月后,PVC复发率为78%,VT复发率为70%,VF复发率为100%。结论:在这种复杂的难治性房颤患者中,使用格尖导管消融是可行且相对安全的。在缺乏大型随机试验的情况下,详尽的登记对于确保新导管技术的安全性和有效性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Europace
Europace 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
851
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: EP - Europace - European Journal of Pacing, Arrhythmias and Cardiac Electrophysiology of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to provide an avenue of communication of top quality European and international original scientific work and reviews in the fields of Arrhythmias, Pacing and Cellular Electrophysiology. The Journal offers the reader a collection of contemporary original peer-reviewed papers, invited papers and editorial comments together with book reviews and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信