The Role of Oral β-Blockers in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction with Preserved or Mildly Reduced Left Ventricular Systolic Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
{"title":"The Role of Oral β-Blockers in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction with Preserved or Mildly Reduced Left Ventricular Systolic Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Yi Chen, Jin Qiu, Tao Ai, Yanqing Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2025.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and preserved or mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), there is clinical uncertainty about the effectiveness of β-blockers in reducing mortality. We therefore investigated the effect of oral β-blockers on clinical benefit in patients with AMI with preserved or mildly reduced LVEF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive systematic search using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 1, 2000 to May 1, 2025, and finally included 16 observational studies and 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the β-blockers on patients with AMI with preserved or mildly reduced LVEF. The primary outcome was all-cause death, and the secondary outcomes were cardiac death, major adverse cardiovascular events, recurrent MI, hospitalization for heart failure, and stroke.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>According to the search strategy, we finally included 18 studies, of which 16 were observational studies and 2 were RCTs. In the 5 studies without propensity score matching data, all-cause death was significantly lower in the β-blocker group than in the no β-blocker group (odds ratio [OR]: 0.65; 95% CI, 0.53-0.80). In the propensity score-matched 10 observational researches and 2 RCTs, there were no significant differences in all-cause death between the 2 groups. β-Blockers seemed to significantly reduce all-cause death in both non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (OR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.82; OR = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40-0.98). β-Blockers seemed to be more effective in lowering all-cause death and cardiac death in patients with AMI and an LVEF of 40% to 50% (OR = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.97), and in the group with a follow-up time of ≥ 3 years, the use of β-blockers was significantly more effective in reducing cardiac death compared with the group with a follow-up time of <3 years (OR = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23-0.88).</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>β-Blockers did not significantly reduce all-cause death and cardiac death in patients with AMI with preserved or mildly reduced LVEF. However, it seemed that patients with an LVEF of 40% to 50% might experience significant benefits in terms of long-term efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2025.06.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and preserved or mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), there is clinical uncertainty about the effectiveness of β-blockers in reducing mortality. We therefore investigated the effect of oral β-blockers on clinical benefit in patients with AMI with preserved or mildly reduced LVEF.
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive systematic search using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 1, 2000 to May 1, 2025, and finally included 16 observational studies and 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the β-blockers on patients with AMI with preserved or mildly reduced LVEF. The primary outcome was all-cause death, and the secondary outcomes were cardiac death, major adverse cardiovascular events, recurrent MI, hospitalization for heart failure, and stroke.
Findings: According to the search strategy, we finally included 18 studies, of which 16 were observational studies and 2 were RCTs. In the 5 studies without propensity score matching data, all-cause death was significantly lower in the β-blocker group than in the no β-blocker group (odds ratio [OR]: 0.65; 95% CI, 0.53-0.80). In the propensity score-matched 10 observational researches and 2 RCTs, there were no significant differences in all-cause death between the 2 groups. β-Blockers seemed to significantly reduce all-cause death in both non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (OR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.82; OR = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40-0.98). β-Blockers seemed to be more effective in lowering all-cause death and cardiac death in patients with AMI and an LVEF of 40% to 50% (OR = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.97), and in the group with a follow-up time of ≥ 3 years, the use of β-blockers was significantly more effective in reducing cardiac death compared with the group with a follow-up time of <3 years (OR = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23-0.88).
Implications: β-Blockers did not significantly reduce all-cause death and cardiac death in patients with AMI with preserved or mildly reduced LVEF. However, it seemed that patients with an LVEF of 40% to 50% might experience significant benefits in terms of long-term efficacy.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Therapeutics provides peer-reviewed, rapid publication of recent developments in drug and other therapies as well as in diagnostics, pharmacoeconomics, health policy, treatment outcomes, and innovations in drug and biologics research. In addition Clinical Therapeutics features updates on specific topics collated by expert Topic Editors. Clinical Therapeutics is read by a large international audience of scientists and clinicians in a variety of research, academic, and clinical practice settings. Articles are indexed by all major biomedical abstracting databases.