Importance of Clinical, Laboratory, and Genetic Risk Factors for Incident CAD.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Romit Bhattacharya, Christopher S Marnell, So Mi Jemma Cho, Aniruddh Patel, Yunfeng Ruan, Satoshi Koyama, Amanda Jowell, Mark Trinder, Sara Haidermota, Kim Lannery, Michael C Honigberg, Seyedeh M Zekevat, Ida Surakka, Gina M Peloso, Pradeep Natarajan
{"title":"Importance of Clinical, Laboratory, and Genetic Risk Factors for Incident CAD.","authors":"Romit Bhattacharya, Christopher S Marnell, So Mi Jemma Cho, Aniruddh Patel, Yunfeng Ruan, Satoshi Koyama, Amanda Jowell, Mark Trinder, Sara Haidermota, Kim Lannery, Michael C Honigberg, Seyedeh M Zekevat, Ida Surakka, Gina M Peloso, Pradeep Natarajan","doi":"10.1161/CIRCGEN.124.004937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prior work suggests modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (CRFs) account for 80% to 90% of the risk for incident myocardial infarction. The contributions of genetic and other novel CRFs have not been simultaneously assessed in contemporary data sets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the United Kingdom Biobank, CRFs were identified and Cox proportional hazards models with traditional CRFs (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, waist-to-hip ratio, diet, exercise, alcohol, and socioeconomic deprivation) and contemporary/genetic CRFs (Lp(a) [lipoprotein(a)], hsCRP [high-sensitivity C-reactive protein], familial hypercholesterolemia variants, and polygenic risk score for coronary artery disease) were constructed for coronary artery disease. Coronary artery disease was defined as a first-time myocardial infarction diagnosis or coronary revascularization. R<sup>2</sup> was calculated for each model, and the percent contribution of each individual CRF was calculated by the R<sup>2</sup> percent decrease after its removal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 299 707 individuals, the mean (SD) age was 56.2 (8.1) years, and 166 533 (55.6%) were women. Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 11.0 (9.6-12.5) years, 17 409 (5.8%) of participants developed myocardial infarction. R<sup>2</sup> increased from the base model (R<sup>2</sup>, 0.021 [0.020-0.022]), to the clinical model (R<sup>2</sup>, 0.045 [0.043-0.046]), to the contemporary/genetic model (R<sup>2</sup>, 0.053 [0.052-0.055]). The most powerful individual CRFs were hypertension (R<sup>2</sup> loss, 15.2% [14.5-17.1]) and polygenic risk score for coronary artery disease (R<sup>2</sup> loss, 12.4% [10.8-13.3]), followed by dyslipidemia (R<sup>2</sup> loss, 3.4% [2.6-3.5]), diabetes (R<sup>2</sup> loss, 2.2% [1.5-2.0]), hsCRP (R<sup>2</sup> loss, 1.8% [1.5-2.0]), and Lp(a) (R<sup>2</sup> loss, 1.5% [1.2-1.8]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Novel CRFs like polygenic risk score for coronary artery disease, hsCRP, and Lp(a) have similar importance, comparable to traditional CRFs such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes, for incident myocardial infarction, highlighting important identifiable residual risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":10326,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e004937"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12240475/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCGEN.124.004937","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prior work suggests modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (CRFs) account for 80% to 90% of the risk for incident myocardial infarction. The contributions of genetic and other novel CRFs have not been simultaneously assessed in contemporary data sets.

Methods: In the United Kingdom Biobank, CRFs were identified and Cox proportional hazards models with traditional CRFs (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, waist-to-hip ratio, diet, exercise, alcohol, and socioeconomic deprivation) and contemporary/genetic CRFs (Lp(a) [lipoprotein(a)], hsCRP [high-sensitivity C-reactive protein], familial hypercholesterolemia variants, and polygenic risk score for coronary artery disease) were constructed for coronary artery disease. Coronary artery disease was defined as a first-time myocardial infarction diagnosis or coronary revascularization. R2 was calculated for each model, and the percent contribution of each individual CRF was calculated by the R2 percent decrease after its removal.

Results: Among 299 707 individuals, the mean (SD) age was 56.2 (8.1) years, and 166 533 (55.6%) were women. Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 11.0 (9.6-12.5) years, 17 409 (5.8%) of participants developed myocardial infarction. R2 increased from the base model (R2, 0.021 [0.020-0.022]), to the clinical model (R2, 0.045 [0.043-0.046]), to the contemporary/genetic model (R2, 0.053 [0.052-0.055]). The most powerful individual CRFs were hypertension (R2 loss, 15.2% [14.5-17.1]) and polygenic risk score for coronary artery disease (R2 loss, 12.4% [10.8-13.3]), followed by dyslipidemia (R2 loss, 3.4% [2.6-3.5]), diabetes (R2 loss, 2.2% [1.5-2.0]), hsCRP (R2 loss, 1.8% [1.5-2.0]), and Lp(a) (R2 loss, 1.5% [1.2-1.8]).

Conclusions: Novel CRFs like polygenic risk score for coronary artery disease, hsCRP, and Lp(a) have similar importance, comparable to traditional CRFs such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes, for incident myocardial infarction, highlighting important identifiable residual risk factors.

临床、实验室和遗传因素对冠心病的重要性。
背景:先前的研究表明,可改变的心血管危险因素(CRFs)占心肌梗死发生风险的80%至90%。遗传和其他新型CRFs的贡献尚未在当代数据集中同时得到评估。方法:在英国生物银行(United Kingdom Biobank)中,对crf进行鉴定,并构建针对冠状动脉疾病的Cox比例风险模型,其中包括传统crf(高血压、糖尿病、血脂异常、腰臀比、饮食、运动、酒精和社会经济剥夺)和当代/遗传crf (Lp(a)[脂蛋白(a)]、hsCRP[高敏c反应蛋白]、家族性高胆固醇血症变异体和冠状动脉疾病多基因风险评分)。冠状动脉疾病定义为首次诊断为心肌梗死或冠状动脉血运重建术。计算每个模型的R2,每个单独的CRF的百分比贡献由去除后的R2下降百分比计算。结果:299 707例患者中,平均(SD)年龄为56.2(8.1)岁,其中女性166 533例(55.6%)。在11.0(9.6-12.5)年的中位(四分位数范围)随访中,17409名(5.8%)参与者发生心肌梗死。R2从基础模型(R2, 0.021[0.020-0.022])增加到临床模型(R2, 0.045[0.043-0.046]),再到当代/遗传模型(R2, 0.053[0.052-0.055])。最强大的个体crf是高血压(R2损失,15.2%[14.5-17.1])和冠状动脉疾病多基因风险评分(R2损失,12.4%[10.8-13.3]),其次是血脂异常(R2损失,3.4%[2.6-3.5])、糖尿病(R2损失,2.2%[1.5-2.0])、hsCRP (R2损失,1.8%[1.5-2.0])和Lp(a) (R2损失,1.5%[1.2-1.8])。结论:冠状动脉疾病、hsCRP和Lp(a)的多基因风险评分等新型CRFs与高血压、血脂异常和糖尿病等传统CRFs对于心肌梗死的重要性相似,突出了重要的可识别的剩余危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
144
期刊介绍: Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine is a distinguished journal dedicated to advancing the frontiers of cardiovascular genomics and precision medicine. It publishes a diverse array of original research articles that delve into the genetic and molecular underpinnings of cardiovascular diseases. The journal's scope is broad, encompassing studies from human subjects to laboratory models, and from in vitro experiments to computational simulations. Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine is committed to publishing studies that have direct relevance to human cardiovascular biology and disease, with the ultimate goal of improving patient care and outcomes. The journal serves as a platform for researchers to share their groundbreaking work, fostering collaboration and innovation in the field of cardiovascular genomics and precision medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信