Rifampicin Exposure in Tuberculosis Patients with Comorbidities in Sub-Saharan Africa: Prioritising Populations for Treatment-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-03 DOI:10.1007/s40262-025-01537-w
Bibie Said, Yuan Pétermann, Patrick Howlett, Monia Guidi, Yann Thoma, Violet Dismas Kajogoo, Margaretha Sariko, Scott K Heysell, Jan-Willem Alffenaar, Emmanuel Mpolya, Stellah Mpagama
{"title":"Rifampicin Exposure in Tuberculosis Patients with Comorbidities in Sub-Saharan Africa: Prioritising Populations for Treatment-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Bibie Said, Yuan Pétermann, Patrick Howlett, Monia Guidi, Yann Thoma, Violet Dismas Kajogoo, Margaretha Sariko, Scott K Heysell, Jan-Willem Alffenaar, Emmanuel Mpolya, Stellah Mpagama","doi":"10.1007/s40262-025-01537-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Emerging evidence suggests that comorbidities like human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, diabetes mellitus (DM), and malnutrition in tuberculosis (TB) patients can alter drug concentrations, thereby affecting the treatment outcomes. For these populations, personalised strategies such as therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may be essential. We investigated the variations of drug levels within comorbid populations and analysed the differences in patterns observed between sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and non-SSA regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of rifampicin drug pharmacokinetics (PK) through searches of major databases from 1980 to December 2023. A random-effects meta-analysis model using R-studio version 4.3.2 was conducted to estimate pooled serum rifampicin exposure (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC], and peak maximum concentration [C<sub>max</sub>]) between patients with TB-HIV infection, and TB-DM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 3300 articles screened, 24 studies met inclusion criteria, contributing 33 comorbidity subgroups for meta-analysis. In SSA, 14 subgroups assessed rifampicin PK in TB-HIV, 1 in TB-DM, and none in TB-malnutrition. The pooled mean C<sub>max</sub> was below the recommended range (8-24 mg/L) for all subgroups. For TB-HIV, the pooled C<sub>max</sub> was 5.59 mg/L, 95% CI (4.59-6.59), I<sup>2</sup> = 97% for SSA populations and 5.59 mg/L, 95% CI (3.65; 6.59) for non-SSA populations. The C<sub>max</sub> for TB-DM in SSA (9.60 ± 4.4 mg/L) exceeded non-SSA (4.27 mg/L, 95% CI [2.77-5.76]). The lowest AUC was in TB-HIV (SSA, 29.09 mg/L h, 95% CI [21.06; 37.13, I<sup>2</sup> = 91%]). High variability and heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> >90%) were observed, with most studies (20/23) showing low bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results emphasise the need for individualised dosing and targeted TDM implementation among TB-HIV and TB-DM populations on rifampicin in SSA. Although all populations exhibited low C<sub>max</sub> levels, TB-HIV populations may be prioritised as AUC levels were lowest. In clinical settings in SSA, C<sub>max</sub>-based TDM is more practical, but AUC can be used in treatment where feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":10405,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacokinetics","volume":" ","pages":"1149-1163"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacokinetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-025-01537-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Emerging evidence suggests that comorbidities like human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, diabetes mellitus (DM), and malnutrition in tuberculosis (TB) patients can alter drug concentrations, thereby affecting the treatment outcomes. For these populations, personalised strategies such as therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may be essential. We investigated the variations of drug levels within comorbid populations and analysed the differences in patterns observed between sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and non-SSA regions.

Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of rifampicin drug pharmacokinetics (PK) through searches of major databases from 1980 to December 2023. A random-effects meta-analysis model using R-studio version 4.3.2 was conducted to estimate pooled serum rifampicin exposure (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC], and peak maximum concentration [Cmax]) between patients with TB-HIV infection, and TB-DM.

Results: From 3300 articles screened, 24 studies met inclusion criteria, contributing 33 comorbidity subgroups for meta-analysis. In SSA, 14 subgroups assessed rifampicin PK in TB-HIV, 1 in TB-DM, and none in TB-malnutrition. The pooled mean Cmax was below the recommended range (8-24 mg/L) for all subgroups. For TB-HIV, the pooled Cmax was 5.59 mg/L, 95% CI (4.59-6.59), I2 = 97% for SSA populations and 5.59 mg/L, 95% CI (3.65; 6.59) for non-SSA populations. The Cmax for TB-DM in SSA (9.60 ± 4.4 mg/L) exceeded non-SSA (4.27 mg/L, 95% CI [2.77-5.76]). The lowest AUC was in TB-HIV (SSA, 29.09 mg/L h, 95% CI [21.06; 37.13, I2 = 91%]). High variability and heterogeneity (I2 >90%) were observed, with most studies (20/23) showing low bias.

Conclusion: Our results emphasise the need for individualised dosing and targeted TDM implementation among TB-HIV and TB-DM populations on rifampicin in SSA. Although all populations exhibited low Cmax levels, TB-HIV populations may be prioritised as AUC levels were lowest. In clinical settings in SSA, Cmax-based TDM is more practical, but AUC can be used in treatment where feasible.

在撒哈拉以南非洲,有合并症的结核病患者暴露于利福平:优先治疗人群——一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景和目的:新出现的证据表明,结核病患者的合并症,如人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染、糖尿病(DM)和营养不良可以改变药物浓度,从而影响治疗结果。对于这些人群,个性化的策略,如治疗药物监测(TDM)可能是必不可少的。我们调查了合并症人群中药物水平的变化,并分析了撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)和非SSA地区之间观察到的模式差异。方法:通过检索1980年至2023年12月的主要数据库,对利福平药物药代动力学(PK)进行系统回顾和meta分析。采用R-studio 4.3.2版本进行随机效应荟萃分析模型,估计TB-HIV感染患者和TB-DM患者的血清利福平暴露(浓度-时间曲线下面积[AUC]和最大浓度峰[Cmax])。结果:从筛选的3300篇文章中,24项研究符合纳入标准,共33个合并症亚组进行meta分析。在SSA中,14个亚组评估了利福平在TB-HIV中的PK值,1个亚组评估了TB-DM中的PK值,没有评估tb -营养不良中的PK值。所有亚组的综合平均Cmax均低于推荐范围(8-24 mg/L)。对于TB-HIV, SSA人群的合并Cmax为5.59 mg/L, 95% CI (4.59-6.59), I2 = 97%, 5.59 mg/L, 95% CI (3.65;6.59)。SSA组TB-DM的Cmax(9.60±4.4 mg/L)高于非SSA组(4.27 mg/L, 95% CI[2.77 ~ 5.76])。AUC最低的是TB-HIV (SSA, 29.09 mg/L h, 95% CI [21.06;37.13, i2 = 91%])。观察到高变异性和异质性(I2 / 0 90%),大多数研究(20/23)显示低偏倚。结论:我们的研究结果强调了在SSA的TB-HIV和TB-DM人群中对利福平进行个体化给药和有针对性的TDM实施的必要性。尽管所有人群都表现出较低的Cmax水平,但由于AUC水平最低,可能优先考虑TB-HIV人群。在SSA的临床环境中,基于cmax的TDM更实用,但在可行的情况下可以使用AUC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacokinetics promotes the continuing development of clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for the improvement of drug therapy, and for furthering postgraduate education in clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. Pharmacokinetics, the study of drug disposition in the body, is an integral part of drug development and rational use. Knowledge and application of pharmacokinetic principles leads to accelerated drug development, cost effective drug use and a reduced frequency of adverse effects and drug interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信