{"title":"A study on adverse events of botulinum toxin type A in real-world applications: A FAERS database analysis.","authors":"Weizhen He, Jian Guo, Yingqian Xu, Xiaoling Huang, Kaiqin Chen","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is widely used for its efficacy in treating a variety of neuromuscular disorders. However, data on its safety and adverse events (AEs) in real-world settings remain limited. The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database provides an invaluable resource for evaluating the safety of BoNT-A.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used four methods to evaluate the disproportionality of AEs associated with BoNT-A: the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 17 307 196 case reports in the FAERS database, there were 69 644 reports where BoNT-A was listed as the \"primary suspect\" for AEs. BoNT-A-related AEs affected 27 system organ classes (SOCs). Based on the four algorithms, 290 significant disproportionalities at the Preferred Term (PT) level were retained. Unexpected AEs, such as skin wrinkles, hyperacusis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, mediastinitis and infective aneurysm, were identified, which are not mentioned in the product insert.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides an overview of AEs in the real-world use of BoNT-A, revealing its broad safety profile. Although the majority of AEs were mild to moderate, there is a need to remain vigilant for serious AEs and to monitor them in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70141","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is widely used for its efficacy in treating a variety of neuromuscular disorders. However, data on its safety and adverse events (AEs) in real-world settings remain limited. The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database provides an invaluable resource for evaluating the safety of BoNT-A.
Methods: We used four methods to evaluate the disproportionality of AEs associated with BoNT-A: the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS).
Results: Among the 17 307 196 case reports in the FAERS database, there were 69 644 reports where BoNT-A was listed as the "primary suspect" for AEs. BoNT-A-related AEs affected 27 system organ classes (SOCs). Based on the four algorithms, 290 significant disproportionalities at the Preferred Term (PT) level were retained. Unexpected AEs, such as skin wrinkles, hyperacusis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, mediastinitis and infective aneurysm, were identified, which are not mentioned in the product insert.
Conclusion: This study provides an overview of AEs in the real-world use of BoNT-A, revealing its broad safety profile. Although the majority of AEs were mild to moderate, there is a need to remain vigilant for serious AEs and to monitor them in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.