Differences in dogs' and wolves' human-directed greeting behaviour: facial expressions, body language, and the problem of human biases.

IF 2.1 2区 生物学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Svenja Capitain, Gwendolyn Wirobski, Çağla Önsal, Giulia Pedretti, Valeria Bevilacqua, Sarah Marshall-Pescini, Friederike Range
{"title":"Differences in dogs' and wolves' human-directed greeting behaviour: facial expressions, body language, and the problem of human biases.","authors":"Svenja Capitain, Gwendolyn Wirobski, Çağla Önsal, Giulia Pedretti, Valeria Bevilacqua, Sarah Marshall-Pescini, Friederike Range","doi":"10.1007/s10071-025-01978-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dogs and wolves communicate effectively with humans, yet differences in their human-directed facial expressions and the role of relationship strength in shaping these behaviours remain poorly understood. This study explored the facial expressions of human-socialized wolves and dogs when greeting a bonded or familiar human through a fence. We hypothesised that differences would arise due to the domestication process, shaped further by the strength of their relationship. Additionally considering the bidirectionality integral to greeting interactions, we explored whether humans show different facial displays toward dogs versus wolves, expecting stronger differences in less bonded human partners due to unconscious biases. There was little overall difference between wolves' and dogs' facial expressions. However, wolves mainly displayed attentive, forward-directed ears, whereas dogs exhibited more ear positions associated with ambivalence or submission, such as rotated and downward-pushed ears. Dogs spent more time in proximity, gazing and tail wagging towards the human than wolves while both species showed more displacement behaviours (paw lift, whining, yawn) with bonded than familiar human partners. Interestingly, humans displayed more frequent, intense, and positive facial expressions toward dogs than wolves, suggesting implicit biases in human attitudes that were only partially influenced by familiarity. These results highlight the complexity of (studying) human-animal interactions. To what extent dogs' submissive yet human-seeking behaviour is indeed species-specific, or rather results from biased human treatment during their life, and which specific mechanisms drove the likely bidirectional influence remains to be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":7879,"journal":{"name":"Animal Cognition","volume":"28 1","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226620/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-025-01978-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dogs and wolves communicate effectively with humans, yet differences in their human-directed facial expressions and the role of relationship strength in shaping these behaviours remain poorly understood. This study explored the facial expressions of human-socialized wolves and dogs when greeting a bonded or familiar human through a fence. We hypothesised that differences would arise due to the domestication process, shaped further by the strength of their relationship. Additionally considering the bidirectionality integral to greeting interactions, we explored whether humans show different facial displays toward dogs versus wolves, expecting stronger differences in less bonded human partners due to unconscious biases. There was little overall difference between wolves' and dogs' facial expressions. However, wolves mainly displayed attentive, forward-directed ears, whereas dogs exhibited more ear positions associated with ambivalence or submission, such as rotated and downward-pushed ears. Dogs spent more time in proximity, gazing and tail wagging towards the human than wolves while both species showed more displacement behaviours (paw lift, whining, yawn) with bonded than familiar human partners. Interestingly, humans displayed more frequent, intense, and positive facial expressions toward dogs than wolves, suggesting implicit biases in human attitudes that were only partially influenced by familiarity. These results highlight the complexity of (studying) human-animal interactions. To what extent dogs' submissive yet human-seeking behaviour is indeed species-specific, or rather results from biased human treatment during their life, and which specific mechanisms drove the likely bidirectional influence remains to be explored.

狗和狼以人为导向的问候行为的差异:面部表情、肢体语言和人类偏见问题。
狗和狼能有效地与人类交流,但它们在人类面部表情上的差异,以及关系强度在塑造这些行为中的作用,人们仍然知之甚少。这项研究探索了人类社会化的狼和狗在隔着栅栏向一个亲密或熟悉的人打招呼时的面部表情。我们假设,由于驯化过程而产生的差异,进一步受到他们关系的强度的影响。此外,考虑到问候互动的双向性,我们探讨了人类是否会对狗和狼表现出不同的面部表情,并预期由于无意识的偏见,在关系较差的人类伴侣中会出现更大的差异。狼和狗的面部表情总体上没有什么不同。然而,狼主要表现出专注、向前的耳朵,而狗则表现出更多与矛盾或顺从相关的耳朵位置,比如旋转和向下推的耳朵。与狼相比,狗会花更多的时间靠近人类,凝视人类,摇尾巴,而与熟悉的人类伴侣相比,这两个物种都表现出更多的位移行为(抬起爪子,呜呜叫,打哈欠)。有趣的是,与狼相比,人类对狗表现出更频繁、更强烈、更积极的面部表情,这表明人类态度中的隐性偏见只部分受到熟悉程度的影响。这些结果突出了(研究)人与动物相互作用的复杂性。在多大程度上,狗的顺从但寻求人类的行为确实是物种特异性的,或者更确切地说,是人类在它们一生中有偏见的对待的结果,以及哪些具体机制驱动了可能的双向影响仍有待探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Cognition
Animal Cognition 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
18.50%
发文量
125
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Animal Cognition is an interdisciplinary journal offering current research from many disciplines (ethology, behavioral ecology, animal behavior and learning, cognitive sciences, comparative psychology and evolutionary psychology) on all aspects of animal (and human) cognition in an evolutionary framework. Animal Cognition publishes original empirical and theoretical work, reviews, methods papers, short communications and correspondence on the mechanisms and evolution of biologically rooted cognitive-intellectual structures. The journal explores animal time perception and use; causality detection; innate reaction patterns and innate bases of learning; numerical competence and frequency expectancies; symbol use; communication; problem solving, animal thinking and use of tools, and the modularity of the mind.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信