Combined Qualitative Assessment of Admission Shock Index, Base Deficit, and Lactate to Enhance Mortality Predication After Blunt Trauma.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Sultan S Abdelhamid, Candace L Ward, Threshia Malcolm, Karla Luketic, Moshumi Godbole, Samantha N Olafson, Amit Joshi, Mark J Kaplan, Alexi Bloom, Benjamin J Moran, Afshin Parsikia, Pak S Leung
{"title":"Combined Qualitative Assessment of Admission Shock Index, Base Deficit, and Lactate to Enhance Mortality Predication After Blunt Trauma.","authors":"Sultan S Abdelhamid, Candace L Ward, Threshia Malcolm, Karla Luketic, Moshumi Godbole, Samantha N Olafson, Amit Joshi, Mark J Kaplan, Alexi Bloom, Benjamin J Moran, Afshin Parsikia, Pak S Leung","doi":"10.1177/00031348251358430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThe role of elevated shock index is increasingly recognized as a vital indicator in the assessment of mortality rates in trauma patients. Its role in combination with other parameters is crucial yet underexplored in predicting outcomes. We hypothesized that qualitative assessment of elevated admission shock index, elevated base deficit/excess, and elevated lactate in combination would best predict mortality after blunt trauma.MethodsThis study was a retrospective review of trauma registry data on blunt trauma patients from 2012 to 2021 at a level 1 trauma center to evaluate the impact of <b>elevated SI</b> (>0.7), <b>elevated lactate</b> 2 mmol/L to 5 mmol/L, and <b>elevated base deficit</b> ≤-2 mmol/L at admission on predicting mortality. We used these parameters as qualitative and categorical predictors rather than continuous measures. A multivariate logistic regression model was developed, with shock index severity stratification and mortality as primary outcomes.ResultsA total of 4794 patients (151 non-survivors) were included in the analysis. Non-survivors had higher rates of elevated SI + elevated lactate + elevated BD (13.9% vs 5.8%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) with highest overall OR (11.7, <i>P</i> < 0.001) compared to other parameters (age 5.5, severe ISS 9.5, and GCS <8 10.3). When stratified by severity, patients with moderate SI (1.0 < SI <1.4) had a significantly increased risk of mortality in combination with elevated lactate and elevated base deficit (OR 21.1, <i>P</i> < 0.001).ConclusionWe previously reported a qualitative model predicting blunt trauma mortality rates using elevated lactate and elevated base deficit. Combining admission SI, whether mild and moderate, with elevated lactate and elevated base deficit as qualitative \"elevated\" biomarkers yielded a more robust predictive model and highest OR for predicting mortality in blunt trauma non-survivors, with an 11.7-fold increase compared to survivors. This was higher than the individual parameters or other combinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348251358430"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251358430","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionThe role of elevated shock index is increasingly recognized as a vital indicator in the assessment of mortality rates in trauma patients. Its role in combination with other parameters is crucial yet underexplored in predicting outcomes. We hypothesized that qualitative assessment of elevated admission shock index, elevated base deficit/excess, and elevated lactate in combination would best predict mortality after blunt trauma.MethodsThis study was a retrospective review of trauma registry data on blunt trauma patients from 2012 to 2021 at a level 1 trauma center to evaluate the impact of elevated SI (>0.7), elevated lactate 2 mmol/L to 5 mmol/L, and elevated base deficit ≤-2 mmol/L at admission on predicting mortality. We used these parameters as qualitative and categorical predictors rather than continuous measures. A multivariate logistic regression model was developed, with shock index severity stratification and mortality as primary outcomes.ResultsA total of 4794 patients (151 non-survivors) were included in the analysis. Non-survivors had higher rates of elevated SI + elevated lactate + elevated BD (13.9% vs 5.8%, P < 0.001) with highest overall OR (11.7, P < 0.001) compared to other parameters (age 5.5, severe ISS 9.5, and GCS <8 10.3). When stratified by severity, patients with moderate SI (1.0 < SI <1.4) had a significantly increased risk of mortality in combination with elevated lactate and elevated base deficit (OR 21.1, P < 0.001).ConclusionWe previously reported a qualitative model predicting blunt trauma mortality rates using elevated lactate and elevated base deficit. Combining admission SI, whether mild and moderate, with elevated lactate and elevated base deficit as qualitative "elevated" biomarkers yielded a more robust predictive model and highest OR for predicting mortality in blunt trauma non-survivors, with an 11.7-fold increase compared to survivors. This was higher than the individual parameters or other combinations.

综合定性评估入院休克指数、基础赤字和乳酸水平以提高钝性创伤后死亡率预测。
休克指数升高越来越被认为是评估创伤患者死亡率的一个重要指标。它与其他参数结合的作用是至关重要的,但在预测结果方面尚未得到充分探索。我们假设定性评估入院时休克指数升高、基础赤字/过剩升高和乳酸水平升高的综合指标能最好地预测钝性创伤后的死亡率。方法回顾性分析某一级创伤中心2012 - 2021年钝性创伤患者的创伤登记数据,评估入院时SI升高(>0.7)、乳酸水平升高2 ~ 5 mmol/L、碱性赤字升高≤-2 mmol/L对预测死亡率的影响。我们使用这些参数作为定性和分类预测因子,而不是连续测量。建立了一个多变量logistic回归模型,以休克指数严重程度分层和死亡率为主要结局。结果共纳入4794例患者(151例非幸存者)。与其他参数(年龄5.5,严重ISS 9.5, GCS P < 0.001)相比,非幸存者SI升高+乳酸升高+ BD升高的发生率更高(13.9% vs 5.8%, P < 0.001),总体OR最高(11.7,P < 0.001)。我们之前报道了一个定性模型,通过升高的乳酸和升高的碱性赤字来预测钝性创伤死亡率。将入院SI(无论是轻度还是中度)与乳酸水平升高和碱基缺陷升高作为定性“升高”的生物标志物相结合,得出了更可靠的预测模型和最高的OR,用于预测钝性创伤非幸存者的死亡率,与幸存者相比增加了11.7倍。这高于单个参数或其他组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信