High-Frequency, At-Home Monitoring of Drug Safety and Tolerability in Clinical Trials: Results From Studies of Fluvoxamine for COVID-19 Treatment

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Eric J. Lenze, Madeline Nykamp, J. Philip Miller, Angela Stevens, Julia Schweiger, Torie Gettinger, Michael Yingling, Yi Zhang, Ginger E. Nicol, Charles F. Zorumski, Angela M. Reiersen
{"title":"High-Frequency, At-Home Monitoring of Drug Safety and Tolerability in Clinical Trials: Results From Studies of Fluvoxamine for COVID-19 Treatment","authors":"Eric J. Lenze,&nbsp;Madeline Nykamp,&nbsp;J. Philip Miller,&nbsp;Angela Stevens,&nbsp;Julia Schweiger,&nbsp;Torie Gettinger,&nbsp;Michael Yingling,&nbsp;Yi Zhang,&nbsp;Ginger E. Nicol,&nbsp;Charles F. Zorumski,&nbsp;Angela M. Reiersen","doi":"10.1111/cts.70292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Clinical trials are increasingly using remote monitoring techniques at the patient's home. We conducted a secondary analysis of remote safety and tolerability monitoring from two fully-remote clinical trials that tested fluvoxamine for the acute treatment of COVID-19. Both trials assessed pulse and blood pressure daily, and one study assessed symptoms daily via Ecological Momentary Assessment. On average, patients provided data on vital signs on 93% of the study days and provided data on side effects on 81% of the study days. With respect to safety, patients taking fluvoxamine had reduced pulse rate compared to placebo, with the greatest difference—5 points—at treatment Day 4. In contrast, fluvoxamine showed little to no effect on blood pressure. With respect to tolerability, nausea was most frequent in the first 4–5 days, declining significantly thereafter, while anxiety and difficulty concentrating were uncommon with fluvoxamine compared to placebo. These findings show that remote assessment of safety and tolerability is feasible in clinical trials, and that frequent assessments can provide in-depth data on the timecourse of safety or tolerability signals.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70292","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70292","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical trials are increasingly using remote monitoring techniques at the patient's home. We conducted a secondary analysis of remote safety and tolerability monitoring from two fully-remote clinical trials that tested fluvoxamine for the acute treatment of COVID-19. Both trials assessed pulse and blood pressure daily, and one study assessed symptoms daily via Ecological Momentary Assessment. On average, patients provided data on vital signs on 93% of the study days and provided data on side effects on 81% of the study days. With respect to safety, patients taking fluvoxamine had reduced pulse rate compared to placebo, with the greatest difference—5 points—at treatment Day 4. In contrast, fluvoxamine showed little to no effect on blood pressure. With respect to tolerability, nausea was most frequent in the first 4–5 days, declining significantly thereafter, while anxiety and difficulty concentrating were uncommon with fluvoxamine compared to placebo. These findings show that remote assessment of safety and tolerability is feasible in clinical trials, and that frequent assessments can provide in-depth data on the timecourse of safety or tolerability signals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

临床试验中高频、在家监测药物安全性和耐受性:氟伏沙明治疗COVID-19的研究结果
临床试验越来越多地在患者家中使用远程监控技术。我们对两项测试氟伏沙明用于COVID-19急性治疗的全远程临床试验的远程安全性和耐受性监测进行了二次分析。两项试验每天评估脉搏和血压,一项研究每天通过生态瞬时评估评估症状。平均而言,患者在93%的研究日提供了生命体征数据,在81%的研究日提供了副作用数据。在安全性方面,与安慰剂相比,服用氟伏沙明的患者脉搏率降低,在治疗第4天差异最大,为5个点。相比之下,氟伏沙明对血压几乎没有影响。就耐受性而言,恶心在头4-5天最常见,此后显著下降,而与安慰剂相比,氟伏沙明不常见焦虑和注意力不集中。这些发现表明,在临床试验中对安全性和耐受性进行远程评估是可行的,并且频繁的评估可以提供有关安全性或耐受性信号的时间过程的深入数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信