Evaluating the degree day model for timing insecticide applications to suppress the bermudagrass stem maggot

IF 1.1 Q3 AGRONOMY
Lisa L. Baxter, William F. Anderson
{"title":"Evaluating the degree day model for timing insecticide applications to suppress the bermudagrass stem maggot","authors":"Lisa L. Baxter,&nbsp;William F. Anderson","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The bermudagrass stem maggot (BSM; <i>Atherigona reversura</i> Villeneuve) can severely damage bermudagrass [<i>Cynodon dactylon</i> (L.) Pers.] forage. Strategically timed pyrethroid applications significantly reduce BSM populations, but application timing needs to be further refined. Therefore, this study evaluated the use of a degree day model for timing insecticide applications to suppress the BSM. The research was conducted in a split plot design with two bermudagrass cultivars (‘Alicia’ and ‘Tifton 85’) and eight insecticide timing treatments ranging from 100 to 400 growing degree days (GDDs) plus an untreated control. The use of insecticide increased mean herbage accumulation and plant height more than the untreated control, but the timing of the insecticide applications did not affect either response (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.01). All insecticide-treated plots had less BSM damage than the untreated control (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.01). The canopies treated with insecticide at 100 and 200 GDD had a cooler micro-environment than those treated at 150 GDD, but all other insecticide timing treatments were not different from those treatments (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.01). Tifton 85 accumulated more herbage, resulted in a taller canopy, and sustained less damage by the BSM than Alicia (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.01). Canopy temperature did not differ between cultivars (<i>P</i> = 0.94). It was hypothesized that greater losses would have occurred in the earliest and latest insecticide treated plots based on feedback from area bermudagrass growers. However, it appears that day of application may be confounded with time of application in these reports. Future investigations should explore this interaction to further refine application timing.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70056","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cft2.70056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The bermudagrass stem maggot (BSM; Atherigona reversura Villeneuve) can severely damage bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] forage. Strategically timed pyrethroid applications significantly reduce BSM populations, but application timing needs to be further refined. Therefore, this study evaluated the use of a degree day model for timing insecticide applications to suppress the BSM. The research was conducted in a split plot design with two bermudagrass cultivars (‘Alicia’ and ‘Tifton 85’) and eight insecticide timing treatments ranging from 100 to 400 growing degree days (GDDs) plus an untreated control. The use of insecticide increased mean herbage accumulation and plant height more than the untreated control, but the timing of the insecticide applications did not affect either response (P < 0.01). All insecticide-treated plots had less BSM damage than the untreated control (P < 0.01). The canopies treated with insecticide at 100 and 200 GDD had a cooler micro-environment than those treated at 150 GDD, but all other insecticide timing treatments were not different from those treatments (P < 0.01). Tifton 85 accumulated more herbage, resulted in a taller canopy, and sustained less damage by the BSM than Alicia (P < 0.01). Canopy temperature did not differ between cultivars (P = 0.94). It was hypothesized that greater losses would have occurred in the earliest and latest insecticide treated plots based on feedback from area bermudagrass growers. However, it appears that day of application may be confounded with time of application in these reports. Future investigations should explore this interaction to further refine application timing.

Abstract Image

利用度日模型对百米草茎蛆施药时机进行评价
百慕大草茎蛆(BSM;红头草(Atherigona reversura Villeneuve)会严重损害百慕大草[Cynodon dactylon (L.)]。珀耳斯。饲料。有策略地定时应用拟除虫菊酯可显著减少BSM种群,但应用时机需要进一步改进。因此,本研究评估了使用度日模型来确定杀虫剂施用的时间以抑制BSM。本研究采用两种百慕大草品种(‘Alicia’和‘Tifton 85’)的分块设计,采用8种杀虫剂定时处理(100 ~ 400生长度日)和1个未经处理的对照。与未施用杀虫剂的对照相比,施用杀虫剂增加了平均牧草积累量和株高,但施用杀虫剂的时间对这两种反应都没有影响(P <;0.01)。所有杀虫剂处理地块的BSM损害均小于未处理的对照(P <;0.01)。100和200 GDD处理的冠层微环境比150 GDD处理的冠层微环境更冷,但所有其他杀虫剂时间处理与这些处理没有差异(P <;0.01)。蒂夫顿85比艾丽西亚积累了更多的牧草,导致更高的冠层,遭受的BSM损害更小。0.01)。不同品种间冠层温度差异不显著(P = 0.94)。根据该地区百慕大草种植者的反馈,推测最早和最近使用杀虫剂的地块损失更大。然而,在这些报告中,申请日期似乎可能与申请时间混淆。未来的研究应该探索这种交互,以进一步优化应用程序计时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management
Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management is a peer-reviewed, international, electronic journal covering all aspects of applied crop, forage and grazinglands, and turfgrass management. The journal serves the professions related to the management of crops, forages and grazinglands, and turfgrass by publishing research, briefs, reviews, perspectives, and diagnostic and management guides that are beneficial to researchers, practitioners, educators, and industry representatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信