Natalie Stoner, Meagan Choates, Carla McGruder, Debra Murray, Theresa Wittman, Sara Wofford, Claire N. Singletary
{"title":"Invisible diversities, academic capital, and competitiveness of genetic counseling applicants","authors":"Natalie Stoner, Meagan Choates, Carla McGruder, Debra Murray, Theresa Wittman, Sara Wofford, Claire N. Singletary","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.70080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The field of genetic counseling has historically lacked diversity. Recent research has explored how individuals with visible underrepresented identities may encounter barriers to becoming competitive genetic counseling applicants. This work has yet to characterize barriers with respect to invisible underrepresented identities, such as being a first-generation college student or a part of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, asexual + (LGBTQ+) community. Therefore, this study aimed to address this gap and to explore whether these factors are related to applicants' academic capital (AC), a theoretical framework used to identify what factors make students more likely to succeed in postsecondary work. AC includes supportive networks, trustworthy information, family uplift, college knowledge, overcoming barriers, concerns about cost, familial expectations, and navigation of systems. Genetic counseling applicants for the 2021 and 2022 admissions cycles were recruited via a multipronged, snowball method and surveyed via Qualtrics (IRB# HSC-MS-21-0477). Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> was used for comparisons. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to account for associations between invisible underrepresented identities and AC. Results indicated individuals who are LGBTQ+, from a disadvantaged background as defined by the National Institute of Health (NIH), or from a low socioeconomic status had significantly lower AC scores by 6.31 points (<i>p</i> < 0.001), 5.81 points (<i>p</i> = 0.001), and 4.53 points (<i>p</i> = 0.050), respectively, compared with individuals who were not underrepresented by each invisible identity. Applicants with mentors had significantly higher AC scores compared with applicants without a mentor (<i>p</i> = 0.042). Concerns about the cost of the application process were prevalent across invisible underrepresented identity groups (UIG). Therefore, mentorship opportunities and reduction of genetic counseling admissions costs may support applicants with invisible diversity in equitable access to the career.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70080","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The field of genetic counseling has historically lacked diversity. Recent research has explored how individuals with visible underrepresented identities may encounter barriers to becoming competitive genetic counseling applicants. This work has yet to characterize barriers with respect to invisible underrepresented identities, such as being a first-generation college student or a part of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, asexual + (LGBTQ+) community. Therefore, this study aimed to address this gap and to explore whether these factors are related to applicants' academic capital (AC), a theoretical framework used to identify what factors make students more likely to succeed in postsecondary work. AC includes supportive networks, trustworthy information, family uplift, college knowledge, overcoming barriers, concerns about cost, familial expectations, and navigation of systems. Genetic counseling applicants for the 2021 and 2022 admissions cycles were recruited via a multipronged, snowball method and surveyed via Qualtrics (IRB# HSC-MS-21-0477). Mann–Whitney U was used for comparisons. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to account for associations between invisible underrepresented identities and AC. Results indicated individuals who are LGBTQ+, from a disadvantaged background as defined by the National Institute of Health (NIH), or from a low socioeconomic status had significantly lower AC scores by 6.31 points (p < 0.001), 5.81 points (p = 0.001), and 4.53 points (p = 0.050), respectively, compared with individuals who were not underrepresented by each invisible identity. Applicants with mentors had significantly higher AC scores compared with applicants without a mentor (p = 0.042). Concerns about the cost of the application process were prevalent across invisible underrepresented identity groups (UIG). Therefore, mentorship opportunities and reduction of genetic counseling admissions costs may support applicants with invisible diversity in equitable access to the career.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.