Invisible diversities, academic capital, and competitiveness of genetic counseling applicants

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Natalie Stoner, Meagan Choates, Carla McGruder, Debra Murray, Theresa Wittman, Sara Wofford, Claire N. Singletary
{"title":"Invisible diversities, academic capital, and competitiveness of genetic counseling applicants","authors":"Natalie Stoner,&nbsp;Meagan Choates,&nbsp;Carla McGruder,&nbsp;Debra Murray,&nbsp;Theresa Wittman,&nbsp;Sara Wofford,&nbsp;Claire N. Singletary","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.70080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The field of genetic counseling has historically lacked diversity. Recent research has explored how individuals with visible underrepresented identities may encounter barriers to becoming competitive genetic counseling applicants. This work has yet to characterize barriers with respect to invisible underrepresented identities, such as being a first-generation college student or a part of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, asexual + (LGBTQ+) community. Therefore, this study aimed to address this gap and to explore whether these factors are related to applicants' academic capital (AC), a theoretical framework used to identify what factors make students more likely to succeed in postsecondary work. AC includes supportive networks, trustworthy information, family uplift, college knowledge, overcoming barriers, concerns about cost, familial expectations, and navigation of systems. Genetic counseling applicants for the 2021 and 2022 admissions cycles were recruited via a multipronged, snowball method and surveyed via Qualtrics (IRB# HSC-MS-21-0477). Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> was used for comparisons. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to account for associations between invisible underrepresented identities and AC. Results indicated individuals who are LGBTQ+, from a disadvantaged background as defined by the National Institute of Health (NIH), or from a low socioeconomic status had significantly lower AC scores by 6.31 points (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), 5.81 points (<i>p</i> = 0.001), and 4.53 points (<i>p</i> = 0.050), respectively, compared with individuals who were not underrepresented by each invisible identity. Applicants with mentors had significantly higher AC scores compared with applicants without a mentor (<i>p</i> = 0.042). Concerns about the cost of the application process were prevalent across invisible underrepresented identity groups (UIG). Therefore, mentorship opportunities and reduction of genetic counseling admissions costs may support applicants with invisible diversity in equitable access to the career.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70080","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The field of genetic counseling has historically lacked diversity. Recent research has explored how individuals with visible underrepresented identities may encounter barriers to becoming competitive genetic counseling applicants. This work has yet to characterize barriers with respect to invisible underrepresented identities, such as being a first-generation college student or a part of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, asexual + (LGBTQ+) community. Therefore, this study aimed to address this gap and to explore whether these factors are related to applicants' academic capital (AC), a theoretical framework used to identify what factors make students more likely to succeed in postsecondary work. AC includes supportive networks, trustworthy information, family uplift, college knowledge, overcoming barriers, concerns about cost, familial expectations, and navigation of systems. Genetic counseling applicants for the 2021 and 2022 admissions cycles were recruited via a multipronged, snowball method and surveyed via Qualtrics (IRB# HSC-MS-21-0477). Mann–Whitney U was used for comparisons. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to account for associations between invisible underrepresented identities and AC. Results indicated individuals who are LGBTQ+, from a disadvantaged background as defined by the National Institute of Health (NIH), or from a low socioeconomic status had significantly lower AC scores by 6.31 points (p < 0.001), 5.81 points (p = 0.001), and 4.53 points (p = 0.050), respectively, compared with individuals who were not underrepresented by each invisible identity. Applicants with mentors had significantly higher AC scores compared with applicants without a mentor (p = 0.042). Concerns about the cost of the application process were prevalent across invisible underrepresented identity groups (UIG). Therefore, mentorship opportunities and reduction of genetic counseling admissions costs may support applicants with invisible diversity in equitable access to the career.

遗传咨询申请者的隐性多样性、学术资本与竞争力
遗传咨询领域历来缺乏多样性。最近的研究探索了那些身份明显被低估的人如何在成为有竞争力的遗传咨询申请人时遇到障碍。这项工作尚未描述与无形的未被充分代表的身份相关的障碍,例如作为第一代大学生或女同性恋,男同性恋,双性恋,变性人,酷儿,无性恋+ (LGBTQ+)社区的一部分。因此,本研究旨在解决这一差距,并探讨这些因素是否与申请人的学术资本(AC)有关,AC是一个用于确定哪些因素使学生更有可能在高等教育工作中取得成功的理论框架。交流包括支持性网络、可靠信息、家庭提升、大学知识、克服障碍、对成本的关注、家庭期望和系统导航。2021年和2022年招生周期的遗传咨询申请人通过多管下的滚雪球方法招募,并通过Qualtrics (IRB# HSC-MS-21-0477)进行调查。曼-惠特尼U用于比较。多元线性回归分析用于解释隐形身份与AC之间的关联。结果表明,LGBTQ+个体,来自国家卫生研究院(NIH)定义的弱势背景的个体,或来自低社会经济地位的个体,其AC得分分别显著降低6.31分(p < 0.001), 5.81分(p = 0.001)和4.53分(p = 0.050)。与那些没有被每个隐形身份所代表的人相比。有导师的申请人的AC分数显著高于没有导师的申请人(p = 0.042)。对申请过程成本的担忧在不可见的未被充分代表的身份群体(UIG)中普遍存在。因此,指导机会和减少遗传咨询入学成本可能会支持具有无形多样性的申请人公平获得职业机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信