The provision of tele-behavioral health services by critical access hospitals and short-term acute care hospitals during the COVID-19 public health emergency

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yvonne Jonk PhD, Heidi O'Connor MS, Sharita Thomas MPP, Chrisopher M. Shea PhD
{"title":"The provision of tele-behavioral health services by critical access hospitals and short-term acute care hospitals during the COVID-19 public health emergency","authors":"Yvonne Jonk PhD,&nbsp;Heidi O'Connor MS,&nbsp;Sharita Thomas MPP,&nbsp;Chrisopher M. Shea PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study examined how the telehealth (TH) flexibilities introduced during the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) affected in-person behavioral health (BH) and tele-behavioral health (TBH) patterns of use among Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries receiving care at critical access hospitals (CAHs) and non-CAH short-term acute care hospitals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used the 2019–2021 5% Medicare Limited Data Set Outpatient and Carrier files to explore differences in TBH usage trends by hospital type in the pre-pandemic year of 2019 and during the pandemic (2020–2021).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>The percentage of hospitals providing TBH services significantly increased from 2019 to 2020–2021 (CAHs: 9% to 17%–23%; non-CAHs: 3% to 21%–22%). Although CAHs had higher TBH usage rates (i.e., the percentage of BH visits conducted through TH) than non-CAHs in the pre-pandemic period, usage rates among non-CAHs (7%–25%) outpaced CAHs (5%–16%) across all census regions—particularly in the Northeast—during the pandemic. In 2021, non-CAHs were able to sustain the use of TBH at higher levels than CAHs across all census regions except for the South.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>While both CAHs and non-CAHs took advantage of the PHE TH flexibilities and significantly increased the likelihood and levels of TBH services, non-CAHs realized higher TBH usage rates than CAHs. The increase in the use of TBH visits was not enough to curb the decline in in-person BH visits during the pandemic. Given efforts to expand broadband and improve digital literacy in rural areas, TH continues to have great potential to reduce rural–urban BH differences in access to BH services.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study examined how the telehealth (TH) flexibilities introduced during the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) affected in-person behavioral health (BH) and tele-behavioral health (TBH) patterns of use among Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries receiving care at critical access hospitals (CAHs) and non-CAH short-term acute care hospitals.

Methods

We used the 2019–2021 5% Medicare Limited Data Set Outpatient and Carrier files to explore differences in TBH usage trends by hospital type in the pre-pandemic year of 2019 and during the pandemic (2020–2021).

Findings

The percentage of hospitals providing TBH services significantly increased from 2019 to 2020–2021 (CAHs: 9% to 17%–23%; non-CAHs: 3% to 21%–22%). Although CAHs had higher TBH usage rates (i.e., the percentage of BH visits conducted through TH) than non-CAHs in the pre-pandemic period, usage rates among non-CAHs (7%–25%) outpaced CAHs (5%–16%) across all census regions—particularly in the Northeast—during the pandemic. In 2021, non-CAHs were able to sustain the use of TBH at higher levels than CAHs across all census regions except for the South.

Conclusions

While both CAHs and non-CAHs took advantage of the PHE TH flexibilities and significantly increased the likelihood and levels of TBH services, non-CAHs realized higher TBH usage rates than CAHs. The increase in the use of TBH visits was not enough to curb the decline in in-person BH visits during the pandemic. Given efforts to expand broadband and improve digital literacy in rural areas, TH continues to have great potential to reduce rural–urban BH differences in access to BH services.

在COVID-19突发公共卫生事件期间,重症医院和短期急症护理医院提供的远程行为卫生服务
本研究考察了COVID-19突发公共卫生事件(PHE)期间引入的远程医疗(TH)灵活性如何影响在关键通道医院(CAHs)和非cah短期急性护理医院接受治疗的医疗保险服务收费受益人的现场行为健康(BH)和远程行为健康(TBH)使用模式。方法使用2019 - 2021年5%医疗保险有限数据集门诊和携带者文件,探讨2019年大流行前和大流行期间(2020-2021年)不同医院类型TBH使用趋势的差异。从2019年到2020-2021年,提供TBH服务的医院比例显著增加(CAHs: 9%至17%-23%;非cahs: 3%至21%-22%)。虽然在大流行前,CAHs的TBH使用率(即通过TH就诊的百分比)高于非CAHs,但在大流行期间,所有人口普查区域,特别是东北部地区,非CAHs的使用率(7%-25%)超过了CAHs(5%-16%)。2021年,在除南方以外的所有人口普查区域,非卫生保健机构的卫生保健使用水平均高于卫生保健机构。结论CAHs和非CAHs都利用了PHE TH的灵活性,显著提高了TBH服务的可能性和水平,但非CAHs的TBH使用率高于CAHs。在大流行期间,使用波黑就诊的增加不足以遏制亲自到波黑就诊的减少。鉴于在农村地区扩大宽带和提高数字素养的努力,卫生保健在缩小城乡卫生保健在获得卫生保健服务方面的差异方面仍然具有巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信