The impact of implementing universal screening for antenatal mental health conditions in Southern Tasmania, Australia: A retrospective observational study

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Thi Ly Tran , Adriana G Nevarez Flores , Eliza Nolan , Brett McDermott , Kate Chappell , Angela Hay , Amanda L Neil
{"title":"The impact of implementing universal screening for antenatal mental health conditions in Southern Tasmania, Australia: A retrospective observational study","authors":"Thi Ly Tran ,&nbsp;Adriana G Nevarez Flores ,&nbsp;Eliza Nolan ,&nbsp;Brett McDermott ,&nbsp;Kate Chappell ,&nbsp;Angela Hay ,&nbsp;Amanda L Neil","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem</h3><div>The impact of universal screening for perinatal depression on referrals is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Australian National Perinatal Depression Initiative (NPDI) implemented in 2008 recommended universal screening of perinatal depression and provision of follow-up support and care when indicated.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To assess the impact of the implementation of the NPDI in public antenatal care in Southern Tasmania on screening levels and referrals provided to support services for mental health and/or psychosocial concerns.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were derived from a clinical audit of digital records for women who attended public antenatal services and gave birth from July-December 2011 (pre-implementation, <em>n</em> = 911) and 2014 (post-implementation, <em>n</em> = 896). Data included patient demographics and obstetric factors, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) scores, and referrals given.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Pre-implementation, 1.32 % of women were screened with the EPDS and 95.98 % post-implementation, with 31.17 % and 26.00 % of women referred to support services respectively. Of those referred, referrals were provided at 1.25 visits on average pre-implementation, 1.57 visits post-implementation. Women younger than 20 years and women living in the most disadvantaged locations were more likely to have an EPDS score ≥10. Communication between antenatal care and primary care providers increased.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Improved communication between care providers indicates a strengthened continuum of care. The impact of the concurrent introduction of an integrated care model on findings is unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The introduction of the NPDI in Southern Tasmania led to higher screening rates but fewer women referred for support services. The findings support the need for embedded evaluations to ensure timely and informed decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 104504"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613825002220","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem

The impact of universal screening for perinatal depression on referrals is unknown.

Background

The Australian National Perinatal Depression Initiative (NPDI) implemented in 2008 recommended universal screening of perinatal depression and provision of follow-up support and care when indicated.

Aim

To assess the impact of the implementation of the NPDI in public antenatal care in Southern Tasmania on screening levels and referrals provided to support services for mental health and/or psychosocial concerns.

Methods

Data were derived from a clinical audit of digital records for women who attended public antenatal services and gave birth from July-December 2011 (pre-implementation, n = 911) and 2014 (post-implementation, n = 896). Data included patient demographics and obstetric factors, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) scores, and referrals given.

Findings

Pre-implementation, 1.32 % of women were screened with the EPDS and 95.98 % post-implementation, with 31.17 % and 26.00 % of women referred to support services respectively. Of those referred, referrals were provided at 1.25 visits on average pre-implementation, 1.57 visits post-implementation. Women younger than 20 years and women living in the most disadvantaged locations were more likely to have an EPDS score ≥10. Communication between antenatal care and primary care providers increased.

Discussion

Improved communication between care providers indicates a strengthened continuum of care. The impact of the concurrent introduction of an integrated care model on findings is unclear.

Conclusion

The introduction of the NPDI in Southern Tasmania led to higher screening rates but fewer women referred for support services. The findings support the need for embedded evaluations to ensure timely and informed decision-making.
澳大利亚南塔斯马尼亚州实施产前精神健康状况普遍筛查的影响:一项回顾性观察研究
问题围产期抑郁症的普遍筛查对转诊的影响尚不清楚。2008年实施的澳大利亚国家围产期抑郁症倡议(NPDI)建议对围产期抑郁症进行普遍筛查,并在必要时提供随访支持和护理。目的评估在南塔斯马尼亚州公共产前保健中实施国家产前发展计划对筛查水平和向心理健康和/或社会心理问题支助服务提供转诊的影响。方法数据来源于2011年7月至12月(实施前,n = 911)和2014年(实施后,n = 896)接受公共产前服务并分娩的妇女的数字记录的临床审计。数据包括患者人口统计学和产科因素、爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)评分和转诊。实施前,1.32%的妇女接受了EPDS筛查,实施后为95.98%,其中31.17%和26.00%的妇女分别接受了支持服务。在这些转介者中,执行前平均转诊1.25次,执行后平均转诊1.57次。年龄小于20岁的女性和生活在最不利地区的女性更有可能出现EPDS评分≥10的情况。产前保健和初级保健提供者之间的沟通增加了。讨论护理提供者之间沟通的改善表明护理的连续性得到加强。同时引入综合护理模式对结果的影响尚不清楚。结论南塔斯马尼亚州NPDI的引入导致更高的筛查率,但较少的妇女转诊到支持服务。调查结果支持需要进行嵌入式评价,以确保及时和知情的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信