Discrepancy between predicted and actual soft tissue balance in robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Hiroshi Inui, Haruhiko Nakamura, Ryota Takei, Masaki Uchida, Kei Satou, Tetsu Yamashita, Risa Matsumoto
{"title":"Discrepancy between predicted and actual soft tissue balance in robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty","authors":"Hiroshi Inui,&nbsp;Haruhiko Nakamura,&nbsp;Ryota Takei,&nbsp;Masaki Uchida,&nbsp;Kei Satou,&nbsp;Tetsu Yamashita,&nbsp;Risa Matsumoto","doi":"10.1016/j.jor.2025.06.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Achieving optimal soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is vital for successful clinical outcomes. Robotic-assisted TKA predicts postoperative soft tissue balance based on preoperative varus–valgus stress. Nevertheless, these predictions may not always be accurate due to changes in soft tissue balance after osteotomy and variability in manual stress application. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the differences between predicted and final soft tissue balance and determine the factors affecting these differences.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In 112 robotic-assisted TKA cases, the predicted joint gaps at extension (10°) and flexion (90°) were evaluated intraoperatively before osteotomy, and the final joint gaps were evaluated after final implantation under manual varus–valgus stress. Differences between the predicted and final gaps (DPFG) e calculated, and correlations between DPFG and preoperative parameters were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final joint gaps were significantly larger than the predicted gaps in both extension and flexion (P &lt; 0.001). A greater preoperative hip–knee–ankle angle and increased flexion angle were associated with smaller DPFG in the medial compartment. Conversely, severe preoperative flexion contracture correlated with larger DPFG in extension in the lateral compartment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Soft tissue balance predictions in robotic-assisted TKA are not always accurate, with the final joint gaps tending to be larger than predicted. Preoperative limb alignment and knee range of motion influence these differences, emphasizing the need for surgeons to interpret robotic predictions cautiously. Adjustments during surgery may be required to optimize soft tissue balance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics","volume":"66 ","pages":"Pages 257-262"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X25002569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Achieving optimal soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is vital for successful clinical outcomes. Robotic-assisted TKA predicts postoperative soft tissue balance based on preoperative varus–valgus stress. Nevertheless, these predictions may not always be accurate due to changes in soft tissue balance after osteotomy and variability in manual stress application. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the differences between predicted and final soft tissue balance and determine the factors affecting these differences.

Methods

In 112 robotic-assisted TKA cases, the predicted joint gaps at extension (10°) and flexion (90°) were evaluated intraoperatively before osteotomy, and the final joint gaps were evaluated after final implantation under manual varus–valgus stress. Differences between the predicted and final gaps (DPFG) e calculated, and correlations between DPFG and preoperative parameters were analyzed.

Results

The final joint gaps were significantly larger than the predicted gaps in both extension and flexion (P < 0.001). A greater preoperative hip–knee–ankle angle and increased flexion angle were associated with smaller DPFG in the medial compartment. Conversely, severe preoperative flexion contracture correlated with larger DPFG in extension in the lateral compartment.

Conclusion

Soft tissue balance predictions in robotic-assisted TKA are not always accurate, with the final joint gaps tending to be larger than predicted. Preoperative limb alignment and knee range of motion influence these differences, emphasizing the need for surgeons to interpret robotic predictions cautiously. Adjustments during surgery may be required to optimize soft tissue balance.
机器人辅助全膝关节置换术中预测与实际软组织平衡的差异
背景:在全膝关节置换术(TKA)中获得最佳的软组织平衡对于成功的临床结果至关重要。机器人辅助TKA预测基于术前内翻应力的术后软组织平衡。然而,由于截骨后软组织平衡的变化和手动应力应用的可变性,这些预测可能并不总是准确的。因此,本研究旨在探讨预测和最终软组织平衡之间的差异,并确定影响这些差异的因素。方法在112例机器人辅助TKA患者中,术中截骨前评估预估关节伸(10°)和屈曲(90°)间隙,并在人工内翻应力下评估最终植入后的最终关节间隙。计算预测间隙与最终间隙(DPFG)的差异,并分析DPFG与术前参数之间的相关性。结果伸展和屈曲关节的最终间隙均明显大于预测间隙(P <;0.001)。术前髋关节-膝关节-踝关节角度越大,屈曲角度越大,内侧腔室DPFG越小。相反,严重的术前屈曲挛缩与侧室DPFG的扩大相关。结论机器人辅助TKA的软组织平衡预测并不总是准确的,最终关节间隙往往比预测的大。术前肢体对齐和膝关节活动范围影响这些差异,强调外科医生需要谨慎解释机器人的预测。手术期间可能需要调整以优化软组织平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
202
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedics aims to be a leading journal in orthopaedics and contribute towards the improvement of quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research work and review articles related to different aspects of orthopaedics including Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, Trauma, Spine and Spinal deformities, Pediatric orthopaedics, limb reconstruction procedures, hand surgery, and orthopaedic oncology. It also publishes articles on continuing education, health-related information, case reports and letters to the editor. It is requested to note that the journal has an international readership and all submissions should be aimed at specifying something about the setting in which the work was conducted. Authors must also provide any specific reasons for the research and also provide an elaborate description of the results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信