{"title":"First-Line Therapy For Advanced Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Fausto Petrelli,Elena Verri,Antonio Ghidini,Ivano Vavassori,Veronica Lonati,Franco Nolè,Lorenzo Dottorini","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.1891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\r\nNon-clear cell renal cell carcinomas (nccRCCs) present considerable challenges owing to their heterogeneity and limited clinical trial representation. Understanding the benefits of combining immunotherapy and targeted therapy for these subtypes is crucial for improving patient outcomes.\r\n\r\nObjective\r\nTo evaluate the efficacy of various first-line immunotherapy combinations and targeted therapy in treating metastatic nccRCC.\r\n\r\nData Sources\r\nA systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception until December 31, 2024, using relevant keywords and medical subject headings terms.\r\n\r\nStudy Selection\r\nStudies were included if they involved patients with nccRCC, reported on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies, and provided data on objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and disease control rate (DCR).\r\n\r\nData extraction and Synthesis\r\nTwo independent reviewers extracted data, with discrepancies resolved by a third expert. Observational study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, and heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic.\r\n\r\nMain Outcome and Measures\r\nThe primary outcomes of interest were ORR, PFS, OS, and DCR.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nThe analysis included 23 studies encompassing various subtypes of nccRCC. Pooled results indicated an ORR of 26.6% and a DCR of 57.8% for nccRCC treatments. Median PFS was 6.59 months, and the median OS was 21.11 months. ICIs demonstrated significant efficacy in nccRCC, exhibiting marked clinical activity across different subtypes. Although monotherapy with ICIs showed effectiveness, combination therapies yielded superior clinical outcomes.\r\n\r\nConclusions and Relevance\r\nThis systematic review and meta-analysis found that ICIs, particularly when combined with targeted therapies, showed promising efficacy in treating metastatic nccRCC. These findings support their integration into treatment guidelines and emphasize the importance of personalized treatment strategies. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes, safety profiles, and the identification of biomarkers to optimize patient selection and improve outcomes.","PeriodicalId":14850,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Oncology","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":22.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.1891","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Importance
Non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas (nccRCCs) present considerable challenges owing to their heterogeneity and limited clinical trial representation. Understanding the benefits of combining immunotherapy and targeted therapy for these subtypes is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
Objective
To evaluate the efficacy of various first-line immunotherapy combinations and targeted therapy in treating metastatic nccRCC.
Data Sources
A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception until December 31, 2024, using relevant keywords and medical subject headings terms.
Study Selection
Studies were included if they involved patients with nccRCC, reported on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies, and provided data on objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and disease control rate (DCR).
Data extraction and Synthesis
Two independent reviewers extracted data, with discrepancies resolved by a third expert. Observational study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, and heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic.
Main Outcome and Measures
The primary outcomes of interest were ORR, PFS, OS, and DCR.
Results
The analysis included 23 studies encompassing various subtypes of nccRCC. Pooled results indicated an ORR of 26.6% and a DCR of 57.8% for nccRCC treatments. Median PFS was 6.59 months, and the median OS was 21.11 months. ICIs demonstrated significant efficacy in nccRCC, exhibiting marked clinical activity across different subtypes. Although monotherapy with ICIs showed effectiveness, combination therapies yielded superior clinical outcomes.
Conclusions and Relevance
This systematic review and meta-analysis found that ICIs, particularly when combined with targeted therapies, showed promising efficacy in treating metastatic nccRCC. These findings support their integration into treatment guidelines and emphasize the importance of personalized treatment strategies. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes, safety profiles, and the identification of biomarkers to optimize patient selection and improve outcomes.
期刊介绍:
JAMA Oncology is an international peer-reviewed journal that serves as the leading publication for scientists, clinicians, and trainees working in the field of oncology. It is part of the JAMA Network, a collection of peer-reviewed medical and specialty publications.