First-Line Therapy For Advanced Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 22.5 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Fausto Petrelli,Elena Verri,Antonio Ghidini,Ivano Vavassori,Veronica Lonati,Franco Nolè,Lorenzo Dottorini
{"title":"First-Line Therapy For Advanced Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Fausto Petrelli,Elena Verri,Antonio Ghidini,Ivano Vavassori,Veronica Lonati,Franco Nolè,Lorenzo Dottorini","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.1891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\r\nNon-clear cell renal cell carcinomas (nccRCCs) present considerable challenges owing to their heterogeneity and limited clinical trial representation. Understanding the benefits of combining immunotherapy and targeted therapy for these subtypes is crucial for improving patient outcomes.\r\n\r\nObjective\r\nTo evaluate the efficacy of various first-line immunotherapy combinations and targeted therapy in treating metastatic nccRCC.\r\n\r\nData Sources\r\nA systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception until December 31, 2024, using relevant keywords and medical subject headings terms.\r\n\r\nStudy Selection\r\nStudies were included if they involved patients with nccRCC, reported on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies, and provided data on objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and disease control rate (DCR).\r\n\r\nData extraction and Synthesis\r\nTwo independent reviewers extracted data, with discrepancies resolved by a third expert. Observational study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, and heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic.\r\n\r\nMain Outcome and Measures\r\nThe primary outcomes of interest were ORR, PFS, OS, and DCR.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nThe analysis included 23 studies encompassing various subtypes of nccRCC. Pooled results indicated an ORR of 26.6% and a DCR of 57.8% for nccRCC treatments. Median PFS was 6.59 months, and the median OS was 21.11 months. ICIs demonstrated significant efficacy in nccRCC, exhibiting marked clinical activity across different subtypes. Although monotherapy with ICIs showed effectiveness, combination therapies yielded superior clinical outcomes.\r\n\r\nConclusions and Relevance\r\nThis systematic review and meta-analysis found that ICIs, particularly when combined with targeted therapies, showed promising efficacy in treating metastatic nccRCC. These findings support their integration into treatment guidelines and emphasize the importance of personalized treatment strategies. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes, safety profiles, and the identification of biomarkers to optimize patient selection and improve outcomes.","PeriodicalId":14850,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Oncology","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":22.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.1891","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance Non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas (nccRCCs) present considerable challenges owing to their heterogeneity and limited clinical trial representation. Understanding the benefits of combining immunotherapy and targeted therapy for these subtypes is crucial for improving patient outcomes. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of various first-line immunotherapy combinations and targeted therapy in treating metastatic nccRCC. Data Sources A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception until December 31, 2024, using relevant keywords and medical subject headings terms. Study Selection Studies were included if they involved patients with nccRCC, reported on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies, and provided data on objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and disease control rate (DCR). Data extraction and Synthesis Two independent reviewers extracted data, with discrepancies resolved by a third expert. Observational study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, and heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic. Main Outcome and Measures The primary outcomes of interest were ORR, PFS, OS, and DCR. Results The analysis included 23 studies encompassing various subtypes of nccRCC. Pooled results indicated an ORR of 26.6% and a DCR of 57.8% for nccRCC treatments. Median PFS was 6.59 months, and the median OS was 21.11 months. ICIs demonstrated significant efficacy in nccRCC, exhibiting marked clinical activity across different subtypes. Although monotherapy with ICIs showed effectiveness, combination therapies yielded superior clinical outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance This systematic review and meta-analysis found that ICIs, particularly when combined with targeted therapies, showed promising efficacy in treating metastatic nccRCC. These findings support their integration into treatment guidelines and emphasize the importance of personalized treatment strategies. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes, safety profiles, and the identification of biomarkers to optimize patient selection and improve outcomes.
晚期非透明细胞肾细胞癌的一线治疗:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
非透明细胞肾细胞癌(nccrcc)由于其异质性和有限的临床试验代表性而面临相当大的挑战。了解针对这些亚型联合免疫治疗和靶向治疗的益处对于改善患者预后至关重要。目的评价各种一线免疫治疗联合靶向治疗转移性nccRCC的疗效。数据来源系统检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,检索时间为2024年12月31日,检索时间为相关关键词和医学主题词。研究选择纳入研究,如果涉及nccRCC患者,报告了基于免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的治疗,并提供了客观缓解率(ORR),无进展生存期(PFS),总生存期(OS)和疾病控制率(DCR)的数据。数据提取和综合两名独立的审稿人提取数据,差异由第三位专家解决。观察性研究质量采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。进行随机效应荟萃分析,并使用I2统计量评估异质性。主要结局和测量主要结局为ORR、PFS、OS和DCR。结果该分析纳入了23项研究,涵盖了不同亚型的nccRCC。汇总结果显示,nccRCC治疗的ORR为26.6%,DCR为57.8%。中位PFS为6.59个月,中位OS为21.11个月。ICIs在nccRCC中表现出显著的疗效,在不同亚型中表现出显著的临床活性。虽然单药治疗显示有效,但联合治疗取得了更好的临床结果。结论和相关性本系统综述和荟萃分析发现,ICIs,特别是与靶向治疗联合使用时,在治疗转移性nccRCC方面显示出良好的疗效。这些发现支持将其纳入治疗指南,并强调个性化治疗策略的重要性。未来的研究应侧重于长期结果、安全性概况和生物标志物的鉴定,以优化患者选择和改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Oncology
JAMA Oncology Medicine-Oncology
自引率
1.80%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: JAMA Oncology is an international peer-reviewed journal that serves as the leading publication for scientists, clinicians, and trainees working in the field of oncology. It is part of the JAMA Network, a collection of peer-reviewed medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信