Optimized in-solution enrichment of over a million ancient human SNPs

IF 10.1 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Roberta Davidson, Xavier Roca-Rada, Shyamsundar Ravishankar, Leonard Taufik, Christian Haarkötter, Evelyn Collen, Matthew P. Williams, Peter Webb, M. Irfan Mahmud, Erlin Novita Idje Djami, Gludhug A. Purnomo, Cristina Santos, Assumpció Malgosa, Linda R. Manzanilla, Ana Maria Silva, Sofia Tereso, Vítor Matos, Pedro C. Carvalho, Teresa Fernandes, Anne-France Maurer, João C. Teixeira, Raymond Tobler, Lars Fehren-Schmitz, Bastien Llamas
{"title":"Optimized in-solution enrichment of over a million ancient human SNPs","authors":"Roberta Davidson, Xavier Roca-Rada, Shyamsundar Ravishankar, Leonard Taufik, Christian Haarkötter, Evelyn Collen, Matthew P. Williams, Peter Webb, M. Irfan Mahmud, Erlin Novita Idje Djami, Gludhug A. Purnomo, Cristina Santos, Assumpció Malgosa, Linda R. Manzanilla, Ana Maria Silva, Sofia Tereso, Vítor Matos, Pedro C. Carvalho, Teresa Fernandes, Anne-France Maurer, João C. Teixeira, Raymond Tobler, Lars Fehren-Schmitz, Bastien Llamas","doi":"10.1186/s13059-025-03622-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In-solution hybridization enrichment of genetic markers is a method of choice in paleogenomic studies, where the DNA of interest is generally heavily fragmented and contaminated with environmental DNA, and where the retrieval of genetic data comparable between individuals is challenging. Here, we benchmark the commercial “Twist Ancient DNA” reagent from Twist Biosciences using sequencing libraries from ancient human samples of diverse demographic origin with low to high endogenous DNA content (0.1–44%). For each library, we tested one and two rounds of enrichment and assessed performance compared to deep shotgun sequencing. We find that the “Twist Ancient DNA” assay provides robust enrichment of approximately 1.2M target SNPs without introducing allelic bias that may interfere with downstream population genetics analyses. Additionally, we show that pooling up to 4 sequencing libraries and performing two rounds of enrichment is both reliable and cost-effective for libraries with less than 27% endogenous DNA content. Above 38% endogenous content, a maximum of one round of enrichment is recommended for cost-effectiveness and to preserve library complexity. In conclusion, we provide researchers in the field of human paleogenomics with a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and limitations of different sequencing and enrichment strategies, and our results offer practical guidance for optimizing experimental protocols.","PeriodicalId":12611,"journal":{"name":"Genome Biology","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-025-03622-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In-solution hybridization enrichment of genetic markers is a method of choice in paleogenomic studies, where the DNA of interest is generally heavily fragmented and contaminated with environmental DNA, and where the retrieval of genetic data comparable between individuals is challenging. Here, we benchmark the commercial “Twist Ancient DNA” reagent from Twist Biosciences using sequencing libraries from ancient human samples of diverse demographic origin with low to high endogenous DNA content (0.1–44%). For each library, we tested one and two rounds of enrichment and assessed performance compared to deep shotgun sequencing. We find that the “Twist Ancient DNA” assay provides robust enrichment of approximately 1.2M target SNPs without introducing allelic bias that may interfere with downstream population genetics analyses. Additionally, we show that pooling up to 4 sequencing libraries and performing two rounds of enrichment is both reliable and cost-effective for libraries with less than 27% endogenous DNA content. Above 38% endogenous content, a maximum of one round of enrichment is recommended for cost-effectiveness and to preserve library complexity. In conclusion, we provide researchers in the field of human paleogenomics with a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and limitations of different sequencing and enrichment strategies, and our results offer practical guidance for optimizing experimental protocols.
优化了超过100万个古代人类snp的溶液富集
遗传标记的溶液内杂交富集是古基因组学研究的一种选择方法,在古基因组学研究中,感兴趣的DNA通常是严重碎片化的,并且受到环境DNA的污染,并且在个体之间可比较的遗传数据的检索具有挑战性。在这里,我们使用来自不同人口来源的古人类样本的测序文库对Twist Biosciences的商业“Twist古代DNA”试剂进行基准测试,这些古人类样本的内源DNA含量从低到高(0.1-44%)。对于每个库,我们测试了一轮和两轮富集,并评估了与深度鸟枪测序相比的性能。我们发现“Twist Ancient DNA”分析提供了大约120万个目标snp的强大富集,而不会引入可能干扰下游群体遗传学分析的等位基因偏差。此外,我们表明,对于内源DNA含量低于27%的文库,汇集多达4个测序文库并进行两轮富集既可靠又具有成本效益。在38%以上的内生内容中,为了节省成本和保持文库的复杂性,建议最多进行一轮富集。综上所述,我们为人类古基因组学领域的研究人员提供了对不同测序和富集策略的优势和局限性的全面了解,并为优化实验方案提供了实践指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genome Biology
Genome Biology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
241
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Genome Biology stands as a premier platform for exceptional research across all domains of biology and biomedicine, explored through a genomic and post-genomic lens. With an impressive impact factor of 12.3 (2022),* the journal secures its position as the 3rd-ranked research journal in the Genetics and Heredity category and the 2nd-ranked research journal in the Biotechnology and Applied Microbiology category by Thomson Reuters. Notably, Genome Biology holds the distinction of being the highest-ranked open-access journal in this category. Our dedicated team of highly trained in-house Editors collaborates closely with our esteemed Editorial Board of international experts, ensuring the journal remains on the forefront of scientific advances and community standards. Regular engagement with researchers at conferences and institute visits underscores our commitment to staying abreast of the latest developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信