Treatment-related adverse events of antibody drug-conjugates in clinical trials

IF 29.5 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Harold Nathan Tan, Marta Ascanio Morcillo, Juanita Lopez, Anna Minchom, Adam Sharp, Alec Paschalis, Georgina Silva-Fortes, Bindu Raobaikady, Udai Banerji
{"title":"Treatment-related adverse events of antibody drug-conjugates in clinical trials","authors":"Harold Nathan Tan, Marta Ascanio Morcillo, Juanita Lopez, Anna Minchom, Adam Sharp, Alec Paschalis, Georgina Silva-Fortes, Bindu Raobaikady, Udai Banerji","doi":"10.1186/s13045-025-01720-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) aim to enhance the therapeutic index of cytotoxic agents but can cause unexpected toxicities. This study evaluated adverse events (AEs) from phase 1 trials at The Royal Marsden Drug Development Unit (DDU) over a decade and pivotal phase 2 and 3 trials leading to FDA registration, correlating AEs with ADC components such as target, antibody, linker, payload, and Drug-to-Antibody Ratio (DAR). We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients treated with ADCs in phase 1 trials (January 2014 to January 2024) compared to published phase 2–3 trials of FDA-approved ADCs. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyzed ADC components and treatment toxicities. One hundred thirty one phase 1 trial patients and 2666 phase 2–3 trial participants were included. High incidences of any-grade treatment-related AEs were observed (89% in phase 1, 93% in phase 2–3), with 58% experiencing grade 3 or higher toxicities in phase 1 and 46% in later phases. Major AEs included fatigue, hematologic toxicities, nausea/vomiting, ocular toxicities, and peripheral neuropathy. Antibody targets were linked to neuropathy, non-cleavable linkers to ocular, pulmonary, and hematologic toxicities, and tubulin-binding payloads to peripheral neuropathy. ADCs with DAR > 4 were associated with higher pulmonary and hematologic AEs. Despite their design to minimize toxicity, ADCs were linked to significant AEs. Specific ADC components may contribute to distinct toxicities, necessitating more robust trial data to inform future ADC design. ","PeriodicalId":16023,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hematology & Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":29.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hematology & Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-025-01720-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) aim to enhance the therapeutic index of cytotoxic agents but can cause unexpected toxicities. This study evaluated adverse events (AEs) from phase 1 trials at The Royal Marsden Drug Development Unit (DDU) over a decade and pivotal phase 2 and 3 trials leading to FDA registration, correlating AEs with ADC components such as target, antibody, linker, payload, and Drug-to-Antibody Ratio (DAR). We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients treated with ADCs in phase 1 trials (January 2014 to January 2024) compared to published phase 2–3 trials of FDA-approved ADCs. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyzed ADC components and treatment toxicities. One hundred thirty one phase 1 trial patients and 2666 phase 2–3 trial participants were included. High incidences of any-grade treatment-related AEs were observed (89% in phase 1, 93% in phase 2–3), with 58% experiencing grade 3 or higher toxicities in phase 1 and 46% in later phases. Major AEs included fatigue, hematologic toxicities, nausea/vomiting, ocular toxicities, and peripheral neuropathy. Antibody targets were linked to neuropathy, non-cleavable linkers to ocular, pulmonary, and hematologic toxicities, and tubulin-binding payloads to peripheral neuropathy. ADCs with DAR > 4 were associated with higher pulmonary and hematologic AEs. Despite their design to minimize toxicity, ADCs were linked to significant AEs. Specific ADC components may contribute to distinct toxicities, necessitating more robust trial data to inform future ADC design.
临床试验中抗体药物偶联物的治疗相关不良事件
抗体-药物偶联物(adc)旨在提高细胞毒性药物的治疗指数,但可能引起意想不到的毒性。本研究评估了英国皇家马斯登药物开发中心(DDU) 10多年来一期试验的不良事件(ae),以及FDA注册的关键性二期和三期试验,将ae与ADC成分(如靶标、抗体、连接物、有效载荷和药抗体比(DAR))相关。我们对2014年1月至2024年1月的一期临床试验中接受adc治疗的患者进行了回顾性队列分析,与已发表的fda批准的adc的2-3期临床试验进行了比较。单因素和多因素logistic回归分析ADC成分和治疗毒性。纳入了131名一期试验患者和2666名2-3期试验参与者。观察到任何级别治疗相关ae的高发生率(1期89%,2-3期93%),其中58%在1期出现3级或更高的毒性,46%在后期。主要不良反应包括疲劳、血液学毒性、恶心/呕吐、眼毒性和周围神经病变。抗体靶点与神经病变有关,不可切割的连接物与眼、肺和血液毒性有关,微管蛋白结合有效载荷与周围神经病变有关。DAR为bbbb4的adc与较高的肺和血液学ae相关。尽管adc的设计是为了最小化毒性,但它们与显著的ae相关。特定的ADC成分可能导致不同的毒性,因此需要更可靠的试验数据来指导未来的ADC设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
48.10
自引率
2.10%
发文量
169
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hematology & Oncology, an open-access journal, publishes high-quality research covering all aspects of hematology and oncology, including reviews and research highlights on "hot topics" by leading experts. Given the close relationship and rapid evolution of hematology and oncology, the journal aims to meet the demand for a dedicated platform for publishing discoveries from both fields. It serves as an international platform for sharing laboratory and clinical findings among laboratory scientists, physician scientists, hematologists, and oncologists in an open-access format. With a rapid turnaround time from submission to publication, the journal facilitates real-time sharing of knowledge and new successes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信