Expansion of Telehealth Availability for Mental Health Care After State-Level Policy Changes From 2019 to 2022.

Ryan K McBain, Megan S Schuler, Nabeel Qureshi, Samantha Matthews, Aaron Kofner, Joshua Breslau, Jonathan H Cantor
{"title":"Expansion of Telehealth Availability for Mental Health Care After State-Level Policy Changes From 2019 to 2022.","authors":"Ryan K McBain, Megan S Schuler, Nabeel Qureshi, Samantha Matthews, Aaron Kofner, Joshua Breslau, Jonathan H Cantor","doi":"10.1176/appi.focus.25023019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Although telehealth services expanded rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic, the association between state policies and telehealth availability has been insufficiently characterized.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the associations between 4 state policies and telehealth availability at outpatient mental health treatment facilities throughout the US.</p><p><strong>Design setting and participants: </strong>This cohort study measured whether mental health treatment facilities offered telehealth services each quarter from April 2019 through September 2022. The sample comprised facilities with outpatient services that were not part of the US Department of Veterans Affairs system. Four state policies were identified from 4 different sources. Data were analyzed in January 2023.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>For each quarter, implementation of the following policies was indexed by state: (1) payment parity for telehealth services among private insurers; (2) authorization of audio-only telehealth services for Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) beneficiaries; (3) participation in the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact (IMLC), permitting psychiatrists to provide telehealth services across state lines; and (4) participation in the Psychology Interjurisdictional Compact (PSYPACT), permitting clinical psychologists to provide telehealth services across state lines.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the probability of a mental health treatment facility offering telehealth services in each quarter for each study year (2019-2022). Information on the facilities was obtained from the Mental Health and Addiction Treatment Tracking Repository based on the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Behavioral Health Treatment Service Locator. Separate multivariable fixed-effects regression models were used to estimate the difference in the probability of offering telehealth services after vs before policy implementation, adjusting for characteristics of the facility and county in which the facility was located.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 828 mental health treatment facilities were included. Overall, 88.1% of facilities offered telehealth services in September 2022 compared with 39.4% of facilities in April 2019. All 4 policies were associated with increased odds of telehealth availability: payment parity for telehealth services (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.19), reimbursement for audio-only telehealth services (AOR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.64-1.81), IMLC participation (AOR, 1.40, 95% CI, 1.24-1.59), and PSYPACT participation (AOR, 1.21, 95% CI, 1.12-1.31). Facilities that accepted Medicaid as a form of payment had lower odds of offering telehealth services (AOR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.65-0.86) over the study period, as did facilities in counties with a higher proportion (>20%) of Black residents (AOR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.50-0.68). Facilities in rural counties had higher odds of offering telehealth services (AOR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.48-1.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Results of this study suggest that 4 state policies that were introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with marked expansion of telehealth availability for mental health care at mental health treatment facilities throughout the US. Despite these policies, telehealth services were less likely to be offered in counties with a greater proportion of Black residents and in facilities that accepted Medicaid and CHIP.Appeared originally in <i>JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2318045</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":73036,"journal":{"name":"Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)","volume":"23 3","pages":"353-361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12207508/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.25023019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Although telehealth services expanded rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic, the association between state policies and telehealth availability has been insufficiently characterized.

Objective: To investigate the associations between 4 state policies and telehealth availability at outpatient mental health treatment facilities throughout the US.

Design setting and participants: This cohort study measured whether mental health treatment facilities offered telehealth services each quarter from April 2019 through September 2022. The sample comprised facilities with outpatient services that were not part of the US Department of Veterans Affairs system. Four state policies were identified from 4 different sources. Data were analyzed in January 2023.

Exposures: For each quarter, implementation of the following policies was indexed by state: (1) payment parity for telehealth services among private insurers; (2) authorization of audio-only telehealth services for Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) beneficiaries; (3) participation in the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact (IMLC), permitting psychiatrists to provide telehealth services across state lines; and (4) participation in the Psychology Interjurisdictional Compact (PSYPACT), permitting clinical psychologists to provide telehealth services across state lines.

Main outcome and measures: The primary outcome was the probability of a mental health treatment facility offering telehealth services in each quarter for each study year (2019-2022). Information on the facilities was obtained from the Mental Health and Addiction Treatment Tracking Repository based on the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Behavioral Health Treatment Service Locator. Separate multivariable fixed-effects regression models were used to estimate the difference in the probability of offering telehealth services after vs before policy implementation, adjusting for characteristics of the facility and county in which the facility was located.

Results: A total of 12 828 mental health treatment facilities were included. Overall, 88.1% of facilities offered telehealth services in September 2022 compared with 39.4% of facilities in April 2019. All 4 policies were associated with increased odds of telehealth availability: payment parity for telehealth services (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.19), reimbursement for audio-only telehealth services (AOR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.64-1.81), IMLC participation (AOR, 1.40, 95% CI, 1.24-1.59), and PSYPACT participation (AOR, 1.21, 95% CI, 1.12-1.31). Facilities that accepted Medicaid as a form of payment had lower odds of offering telehealth services (AOR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.65-0.86) over the study period, as did facilities in counties with a higher proportion (>20%) of Black residents (AOR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.50-0.68). Facilities in rural counties had higher odds of offering telehealth services (AOR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.48-1.88).

Conclusion and relevance: Results of this study suggest that 4 state policies that were introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with marked expansion of telehealth availability for mental health care at mental health treatment facilities throughout the US. Despite these policies, telehealth services were less likely to be offered in counties with a greater proportion of Black residents and in facilities that accepted Medicaid and CHIP.Appeared originally in JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2318045.

2019年至2022年州级政策变化后精神卫生保健远程医疗可用性的扩大。
重要性:尽管在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间远程医疗服务迅速扩大,但国家政策与远程医疗可用性之间的关联尚未得到充分表征。目的:调查美国4个州的政策与门诊精神卫生治疗机构远程医疗可及性之间的关系。设计环境和参与者:这项队列研究测量了从2019年4月到2022年9月每个季度心理健康治疗机构是否提供远程医疗服务。样本包括不属于美国退伍军人事务部系统的门诊服务设施。从4个不同的来源确定了4项国家政策。数据分析时间为2023年1月。风险敞口:各州对每个季度的以下政策实施情况进行了索引:(1)私营保险公司之间远程医疗服务的支付平价;(2)授权为医疗补助和儿童健康保险计划(CHIP)受益人提供纯音频远程医疗服务;(3)参加州际医疗执照契约(IMLC),允许精神病医生跨州提供远程医疗服务;(4)参加《心理学跨管辖区契约》(PSYPACT),允许临床心理学家跨州提供远程保健服务。主要结果和措施:主要结果是每个研究年度(2019-2022年)每个季度提供远程医疗服务的精神卫生治疗机构的概率。这些设施的信息来自基于药物滥用和精神健康服务管理局行为健康治疗服务定位器的精神健康和成瘾治疗跟踪存储库。使用单独的多变量固定效应回归模型来估计政策实施后与政策实施前提供远程医疗服务的概率差异,并根据设施和设施所在县的特征进行调整。结果:共纳入精神卫生治疗机构12 828家。总体而言,2022年9月,88.1%的设施提供远程医疗服务,而2019年4月这一比例为39.4%。所有4项政策都与远程医疗可获得性的几率增加有关:远程医疗服务的支付平价(调整优势比[AOR], 1.11;95% CI, 1.03-1.19),纯音频远程医疗服务的报销(AOR, 1.73;95% CI, 1.64-1.81), IMLC参与(AOR, 1.40, 95% CI, 1.24-1.59)和PSYPACT参与(AOR, 1.21, 95% CI, 1.12-1.31)。接受医疗补助作为一种支付方式的机构提供远程医疗服务的几率较低(AOR, 0.75;95% CI, 0.65-0.86),黑人居民比例较高的县的设施也是如此(AOR, 0.58;95% ci, 0.50-0.68)。农村县的医疗机构提供远程医疗服务的几率更高(AOR, 1.67;95% ci, 1.48-1.88)。结论和相关性:本研究的结果表明,在COVID-19大流行期间引入的4项州政策与美国精神卫生治疗机构精神卫生保健远程医疗服务的显著扩大有关。尽管有这些政策,但在黑人居民比例较高的县和接受医疗补助和CHIP的设施中,提供远程医疗服务的可能性较小。最初出现在JAMA Netw Open 2023;6: e2318045。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信