When teaching procedures in simulation, do simulation adjuncts translate to better performance?

IF 4.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jennifer Yee, Kimberly Bambach, David P Way, Christopher E San Miguel, Cynthia G Leung, Scott Winfield, Rami A Ahmed
{"title":"When teaching procedures in simulation, do simulation adjuncts translate to better performance?","authors":"Jennifer Yee, Kimberly Bambach, David P Way, Christopher E San Miguel, Cynthia G Leung, Scott Winfield, Rami A Ahmed","doi":"10.1186/s41077-025-00365-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Learners should ideally be taught low-frequency, high-acuity procedures in a simulated clinical environment to limit patient harm. Evidence supporting a simulation scenario with educational adjuncts to teach procedures versus a traditional procedure laboratory have not been previously demonstrated. To investigate the effects of simulation adjuncts on procedural skills attainment, we compared performances of learners who trained on a modified airway task trainer within the context of a simulation scenario with educational adjuncts for balloon tamponade placement to those who trained on the same task trainer in a typical procedure laboratory setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty learners completed the curriculum: 37 emergency medicine residents, 8 emergency medicine/internal medicine residents, and 5 gastroenterology fellows. Learners were randomized into a simulation scenario with adjuncts (SA) or a control group using a modified task trainer in a procedure laboratory (PL) setting. We conducted baseline, approximately 1-month, and 5-month post-training assessments of self-identified competence, knowledge of the procedure, and observed procedural skills.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Learners from both groups demonstrated significant improvement on all three assessments from baseline to the first post-training session. Between the first and second follow-ups, both groups significantly improved on self-assessed competence. At the second follow-up, the PL-trained group scored significantly higher than the SA group on the performance assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All learners demonstrated significant improvements in knowledge, skills performance, and feelings of competence. The PL group demonstrated significantly higher skills performance during the second follow-up after training. This finding suggests that structured practice alone is an effective learning strategy for balloon tamponade placement without needing the resources of accompanying adjuncts within a simulation scenario, and that education with additional adjuncts may contribute to skills decay over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":"10 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12219805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-025-00365-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Learners should ideally be taught low-frequency, high-acuity procedures in a simulated clinical environment to limit patient harm. Evidence supporting a simulation scenario with educational adjuncts to teach procedures versus a traditional procedure laboratory have not been previously demonstrated. To investigate the effects of simulation adjuncts on procedural skills attainment, we compared performances of learners who trained on a modified airway task trainer within the context of a simulation scenario with educational adjuncts for balloon tamponade placement to those who trained on the same task trainer in a typical procedure laboratory setting.

Methods: Fifty learners completed the curriculum: 37 emergency medicine residents, 8 emergency medicine/internal medicine residents, and 5 gastroenterology fellows. Learners were randomized into a simulation scenario with adjuncts (SA) or a control group using a modified task trainer in a procedure laboratory (PL) setting. We conducted baseline, approximately 1-month, and 5-month post-training assessments of self-identified competence, knowledge of the procedure, and observed procedural skills.

Results: Learners from both groups demonstrated significant improvement on all three assessments from baseline to the first post-training session. Between the first and second follow-ups, both groups significantly improved on self-assessed competence. At the second follow-up, the PL-trained group scored significantly higher than the SA group on the performance assessment.

Conclusions: All learners demonstrated significant improvements in knowledge, skills performance, and feelings of competence. The PL group demonstrated significantly higher skills performance during the second follow-up after training. This finding suggests that structured practice alone is an effective learning strategy for balloon tamponade placement without needing the resources of accompanying adjuncts within a simulation scenario, and that education with additional adjuncts may contribute to skills decay over time.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在模拟教学过程中,模拟辅助是否转化为更好的表现?
背景:理想情况下,学习者应该在模拟临床环境中学习低频、高灵敏度的手术,以限制对患者的伤害。有证据表明,与传统的程序实验室相比,支持具有教育辅助的模拟场景来教授程序的证据尚未得到证实。为了研究模拟辅助训练对程序性技能获得的影响,我们比较了在模拟情境下接受改良气道任务训练器训练的学习者与在典型程序实验室环境下接受相同任务训练器训练的学习者的表现。方法:50名学员完成课程:37名急诊科住院医师,8名急诊科/内科住院医师,5名消化内科研究员。学习者被随机分为有辅助人员(SA)的模拟场景或在程序实验室(PL)设置中使用改进任务训练器的对照组。我们在培训后进行了基线、大约1个月和5个月的自我鉴定能力、程序知识和观察程序技能评估。结果:从基线到第一次培训后课程,两组学习者在所有三项评估中都表现出显著的改善。在第一次和第二次随访期间,两组的自我评估能力都有显著提高。在第二次随访中,pl训练组的绩效评估得分显著高于SA组。结论:所有的学习者在知识、技能表现和能力感受方面都有显著的提高。在训练后的第二次随访中,PL组表现出明显更高的技能表现。这一发现表明,在模拟场景中,不需要辅助教学资源的情况下,单独的结构化实践是气囊填塞放置的有效学习策略,并且随着时间的推移,额外的辅助教学可能会导致技能衰退。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信