Benjamin Palla, Sebastian Graca, Steven Licht, Michael Han, Michael Miloro
{"title":"How much variation exists amongst experienced surgeons in orthognathic surgical planning?","authors":"Benjamin Palla, Sebastian Graca, Steven Licht, Michael Han, Michael Miloro","doi":"10.1016/j.bjoms.2025.05.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Discussions of orthognathic planning are often dogmatic, however, it is a subjective science. The aim of this study was to quantify the variation in orthognathic surgery planning in a group of experienced orthognathic surgeons. A cross-sectional study was designed, and an identical presurgical orthognathic case provided to 13 surgeons. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact test, and MANOVA with p < 0.05 considered significant. The mean (SD) anterior-posterior (AP) movement of the upper incisors was 5.8 (1.5) mm anterior (range 3.0-7.0 mm), and 0.7 mm (-0.7 (1.9) mm; range -2.9 to 4.0 mm). The mean (SD) AP movement of pogonion was 0.6 mm posterior (-0.6 (2.2) mm; range 5.5 mm posterior to 2.1 mm anterior). The standard deviations in movement (AP and superior-inferior) were greatest at pogonion (2.3 mm and 1.9 mm), followed by B-point (1.9 mm and 2.0 mm), maxillary incisor (1.5 mm and 1.9 mm), then A-point (1.4 mm and 1.8 mm). This study shows that significant variation exists in surgical planning among a group of experienced orthognathic surgeons at the level of pogonion and B-point, with less variation at the maxillary central incisor and A-point. Future studies may compare these results with surgeons with less orthognathic expertise, or non-OMS trained surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":55318,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2025.05.013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Discussions of orthognathic planning are often dogmatic, however, it is a subjective science. The aim of this study was to quantify the variation in orthognathic surgery planning in a group of experienced orthognathic surgeons. A cross-sectional study was designed, and an identical presurgical orthognathic case provided to 13 surgeons. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact test, and MANOVA with p < 0.05 considered significant. The mean (SD) anterior-posterior (AP) movement of the upper incisors was 5.8 (1.5) mm anterior (range 3.0-7.0 mm), and 0.7 mm (-0.7 (1.9) mm; range -2.9 to 4.0 mm). The mean (SD) AP movement of pogonion was 0.6 mm posterior (-0.6 (2.2) mm; range 5.5 mm posterior to 2.1 mm anterior). The standard deviations in movement (AP and superior-inferior) were greatest at pogonion (2.3 mm and 1.9 mm), followed by B-point (1.9 mm and 2.0 mm), maxillary incisor (1.5 mm and 1.9 mm), then A-point (1.4 mm and 1.8 mm). This study shows that significant variation exists in surgical planning among a group of experienced orthognathic surgeons at the level of pogonion and B-point, with less variation at the maxillary central incisor and A-point. Future studies may compare these results with surgeons with less orthognathic expertise, or non-OMS trained surgeons.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons:
• Leading articles on all aspects of surgery in the oro-facial and head and neck region
• One of the largest circulations of any international journal in this field
• Dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise.