Paediatric T-condylar fracture of distal humerus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Sushil Prajapati, Omprakash Meena, Mohit Kumar Patralekh, Vibhu Krishnan Viswanathan, Deepak Kumar, Vijay Kumar Jain
{"title":"Paediatric T-condylar fracture of distal humerus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Sushil Prajapati, Omprakash Meena, Mohit Kumar Patralekh, Vibhu Krishnan Viswanathan, Deepak Kumar, Vijay Kumar Jain","doi":"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>T-condylar fractures of the distal humerus are rare pediatric injuries. There is no consensus regarding ideal management and clinical outcomes for these injuries. The current review was planned to comprehensively review existing evidence regarding these rare pediatric fractures. A literature search was performed to identify the articles on pediatric T-condylar distal humerus fractures (1950-2024). Patient data was categorized under two groups: groups A (≤8 years old) and B (9-18 years). Finally, 32 articles were reviewed. Groups A and B included 25 and 148 patients, respectively. A majority of patients were males (72.3%) in both groups. 100% and 95.3% (141) of patients in groups A and B, respectively, were managed surgically [closed/open reduction and internal fixation (CR/ORIF)]. IF was predominantly done using Kirschner wire (K-wire) in group A. In group B, IF was performed using plate/screw/K-wire. There was no significant difference in complication rates between the groups [3/10 and 39/62 complications were observed in groups A and B, respectively; Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio:0.33 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.09-1.14; Z = 1.75, P = 0.08; Chi-square = 3.23, P = 0.66; I2 = 0%)]. 87.5% in group A and 91.8% in group B had excellent; and good to excellent outcomes, respectively. The final elbow range of motion was significantly higher in group A (vs. group B; mean difference:13.91°; 95% CI: 6.93°-20.89°; test of overall effect: z = 3.91, P < 0.0001). Surgical management (i.e. ORIF) is the preferred intervention in pediatric T-condylar fractures. K-wire fixation is the most common operative technique. Overall complication rate is 58.3% (irrespective of age and treatment). Postinjury stiffness is more common in older children (>8 years).</p>","PeriodicalId":50092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001268","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

T-condylar fractures of the distal humerus are rare pediatric injuries. There is no consensus regarding ideal management and clinical outcomes for these injuries. The current review was planned to comprehensively review existing evidence regarding these rare pediatric fractures. A literature search was performed to identify the articles on pediatric T-condylar distal humerus fractures (1950-2024). Patient data was categorized under two groups: groups A (≤8 years old) and B (9-18 years). Finally, 32 articles were reviewed. Groups A and B included 25 and 148 patients, respectively. A majority of patients were males (72.3%) in both groups. 100% and 95.3% (141) of patients in groups A and B, respectively, were managed surgically [closed/open reduction and internal fixation (CR/ORIF)]. IF was predominantly done using Kirschner wire (K-wire) in group A. In group B, IF was performed using plate/screw/K-wire. There was no significant difference in complication rates between the groups [3/10 and 39/62 complications were observed in groups A and B, respectively; Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio:0.33 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.09-1.14; Z = 1.75, P = 0.08; Chi-square = 3.23, P = 0.66; I2 = 0%)]. 87.5% in group A and 91.8% in group B had excellent; and good to excellent outcomes, respectively. The final elbow range of motion was significantly higher in group A (vs. group B; mean difference:13.91°; 95% CI: 6.93°-20.89°; test of overall effect: z = 3.91, P < 0.0001). Surgical management (i.e. ORIF) is the preferred intervention in pediatric T-condylar fractures. K-wire fixation is the most common operative technique. Overall complication rate is 58.3% (irrespective of age and treatment). Postinjury stiffness is more common in older children (>8 years).

儿童肱骨远端t型髁骨折:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
肱骨远端t型髁骨折是罕见的儿童损伤。对于这些损伤的理想治疗和临床结果尚无共识。本综述计划全面回顾有关这些罕见儿童骨折的现有证据。对儿童t -髁肱骨远端骨折(1950-2024)进行文献检索。患者资料分为两组:A组(≤8岁)和B组(9-18岁)。最后对32篇文章进行了综述。A组25例,B组148例。两组患者均以男性为主(72.3%)。A组和B组分别有100%和95.3%(141)的患者采用手术治疗[闭合/切开复位内固定(CR/ORIF)]。a组以克氏针(k -丝)为主,B组以钢板/螺钉/ k -丝为主。两组间并发症发生率差异无统计学意义[A、B组并发症发生率分别为3/10、39/62;Mantel-Haenszel优势比:0.33(95%可信区间(CI): 0.09-1.14;Z = 1.75, p = 0.08;卡方= 3.23,P = 0.66;I2 = 0%)]。A组为87.5%,B组为91.8%;从好的结果到优异的结果。A组肘关节活动度明显高于B组;平均差:13.91°;95% ci: 6.93°-20.89°;总效应检验:z = 3.91, P < 0.0001)。手术治疗(即ORIF)是儿童t型髁骨折的首选干预措施。钢丝固定是最常用的手术技术。总的并发症发生率为58.3%(与年龄和治疗无关)。损伤后僵硬更常见于年龄较大的儿童(bb0 ~ 8岁)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal highlights important recent developments from the world''s leading clinical and research institutions. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers on the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric orthopedic disorders. It is the official journal of IFPOS (International Federation of Paediatric Orthopaedic Societies). Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信