Lee-Kai Sun, Lia M Farrell, Kelsea R LaSorda, Robert T Krafty, Grace Lim
{"title":"Psychophysical correlates of labor pain intensity and unpleasantness.","authors":"Lee-Kai Sun, Lia M Farrell, Kelsea R LaSorda, Robert T Krafty, Grace Lim","doi":"10.1080/0167482X.2025.2527670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The neurobiological mechanisms linking perinatal pain and mood disorders remain unclear. Emotional dimensions of labor pain, particularly unpleasantness, may reflect engagement of limbic pathways shared with affective disorders. This study examined whether prenatal quantitative sensory testing (QST) parameters are associated with the sensory and emotional dimensions of labor pain. Healthy primiparous women were enrolled and followed from third trimester through delivery. Prenatal QST assessed mechanical and thermal thresholds, tolerances, and temporal summation. Labor pain was recorded hourly using a validated electronic diary. Univariable linear regression evaluated relationships between QST measures and labor pain outcomes. Of 164 participants completing QST, , 55 had complete labor pain diaries. Prenatal QST parameters were associated with emotional, but not sensory, aspects of labor pain. Pain unpleasantness was associated with average heat threshold (Coefficient = 40.3, SE = 17.2, <i>p</i> = 0.02), post wind-up pain (Coefficient = -48.9, SE = 25.3, <i>p</i> = 0.06) and post probe pain (Coefficient = -52.7, SE = 26.8, <i>p</i> = 0.06), using a <i>p</i> < 0.1 threshold to identify associations. Although exploratory, these findings suggest that prenatal QST, particularly thermal threshold and central sensitization measures, may help identify individuals at risk for maladaptive labor pain and postpartum mood disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":50072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"46 1","pages":"2527670"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2025.2527670","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The neurobiological mechanisms linking perinatal pain and mood disorders remain unclear. Emotional dimensions of labor pain, particularly unpleasantness, may reflect engagement of limbic pathways shared with affective disorders. This study examined whether prenatal quantitative sensory testing (QST) parameters are associated with the sensory and emotional dimensions of labor pain. Healthy primiparous women were enrolled and followed from third trimester through delivery. Prenatal QST assessed mechanical and thermal thresholds, tolerances, and temporal summation. Labor pain was recorded hourly using a validated electronic diary. Univariable linear regression evaluated relationships between QST measures and labor pain outcomes. Of 164 participants completing QST, , 55 had complete labor pain diaries. Prenatal QST parameters were associated with emotional, but not sensory, aspects of labor pain. Pain unpleasantness was associated with average heat threshold (Coefficient = 40.3, SE = 17.2, p = 0.02), post wind-up pain (Coefficient = -48.9, SE = 25.3, p = 0.06) and post probe pain (Coefficient = -52.7, SE = 26.8, p = 0.06), using a p < 0.1 threshold to identify associations. Although exploratory, these findings suggest that prenatal QST, particularly thermal threshold and central sensitization measures, may help identify individuals at risk for maladaptive labor pain and postpartum mood disorders.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology was founded in 1982 in order to provide a scientific forum for obstetricians, gynecologists, psychiatrists and psychologists, academic health professionals as well as for all those who are interested in the psychosocial and psychosomatic aspects of women’s health. Another of its aims is to stimulate obstetricians and gynecologists to pay more attention to this very important facet of their profession.